Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3043 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I'm looking for some advise on below as I'm not really sure what I am supposed to do next.

 

On the 16-Nov-2015 I received a CCJ for £2,958.71. This included all costs and interest and was to be paid forthwith

 

On the 2-Dec-2015 I paid, directly to the creditor £2,958.71

 

I emailed creditor on the 2-Dec-2015 to say I had made payment

 

On the 4-Dec-2015 I called the creditor twice to confirm they had received payment. I was promised a call back. No call was returned.

 

On the 7-Dec-2015 an email was received from creditor saying that the payment of £2,958.71 clears the judgement debt only

and that further costs of £111.75 plus a further sum for sheriff fees and additional costs.

 

 

It then went on to say that as I had failed to respond to the sheriffs initial compliance letter I was liable to additional fees.

I have not received any correspondence from a sheriff at this stage.

 

Today the sheriff attended my property (no one home) stating, in a letter through the door, t

he amount I owe is £3,070.46 (which is the CCJ plus this £111.75 which I don't know what that is for),

interest of £6.49 was added, a £90 compliance stage fee,

a £822 enforcement stage fee, less payment of £2958.71 leaving a balance of £1,030.24.

 

 

They have taken into control two cars and have told me to pay this by 18-Dec-2015.

 

I called the creditor and sheriff today.

I was told that despite paying the CCJ the creditor instructed the sheriff to peruse the debt in full

(I guess the remaining £111.75) which had I been told about it prior to the 5-Dec-2015 I would have paid.

 

So my questions are,

once a CCJ is paid can they legally enforce the debt with no further court order?

and secondly

are the fees appropriate for the outstanding balance of £111.75

or are they entitled to work on the original balance of £3,070.46 despite the majority being paid?.

 

Thanks very much!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As I understand it, you only had to pay whatever was on the Judgment ? So if it asked only for £2,958.71.and this is what you paid, I am not sure why you are being asked for more money. Perhaps have a word with the court ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure that if you paid the judgement within 28days of it being handed down

they can go bugger off!

 

tell the court what they have done.

 

what was the debt please

consumer credit

or something else?

and by whom was the claim made

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replies. I will call the court on Monday.

 

@dx...It was for a utility company (bulkLPG gas).

 

 

I had a budget account with a monthly DD in place which lapsed when I changed bank accounts earlier in the year

and I didn't set it up on the new account at same time wife was taken ill.

That's not to say I shouldn't have dealt with this prior to it going to court

so I only have myself to blame in that sense.

 

 

But this strikes me as inappropriate behaviour by the company in the first place

and then the high court bailiff seem to be a bunch of chancers adding nearly £1k worth of charges

 

 

when I spoke with them explaining I had paid the judgement therefore asking them to justify what were they enforcing today

they spoke about writs being issued and executed and were behaving correctly and it all sounded very complicated.

 

 

I'll certainly look to peruse this with both companies regulators/governing bodies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I'm looking for some advise on below as I'm not really sure what I am supposed to do next.

 

On the 16-Nov-2015 I received a CCJ for £2,958.71. This included all costs and interest and was to be paid forthwith

 

On the 2-Dec-2015 I paid, directly to the creditor £2,958.71

 

I emailed creditor on the 2-Dec-2015 to say I had made payment

 

On the 4-Dec-2015 I called the creditor twice to confirm they had received payment. I was promised a call back. No call was returned.

 

On the 7-Dec-2015 an email was received from creditor saying that the payment of £2,958.71 clears the judgement debt only

and that further costs of £111.75 plus a further sum for sheriff fees and additional costs.

 

You really do need to check with the creditor as to what date they transferred the judgment to the High Court.

 

What date was the Notice of Enforcement from the enforcement company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really do need to check with the creditor as to what date they transferred the judgment to the High Court.

 

What date was the Notice of Enforcement from the enforcement company?

 

I didn't receive such a notice however they claim to have sent one on 25-Nov and I have no reason to doubt that is the case. Would that be the date they transferred it?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes and see if you have a record of the day the payment left your bank.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do. My bank account online shows the payment was made on 2nd Dec and the creditor has confirmed they received payment on 2nd Dec in an email.

 

Payment was made by debit card via creditors online payment system

Link to post
Share on other sites

A forthwith Judgment can be executed immediately ...so from the 17th November on wards ...if you have a copy of the judgment does it refer to a payment date?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

A forthwith Judgment can be executed immediately ...so from the 17th November on wards ...if you have a copy of the judgment does it refer to a payment date?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Yes indeed it can. The issue is if the judgement sum was paid before the HCEO received the writ from the court.

Before this the debt was not under and enforcment power, so the compliance fee cannot be charged. In fact it is unlikely that the transfer up fee can be reclaimed by the bailiff. as the power, as said had not commenced when the fee was charged.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Im fully aware of the issue and transfer...I want to know if a date had been provided on the judgment notice of payment by xxxxx....if there was then in reality it should never have been transferred up until after that date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yes Im fully aware of the issue and transfer...I want to know if a date had been provided on the judgment notice of payment by xxxxx....if there was then in reality it should never have been transferred up until after that date.

 

 

 

I have seen quite a few where the original CCJ has been awarded but then been transferred up immediately. Sometimes frowned upon by a DJ - particularly if full payment made if debtor not previously aware & Set Aside quite likely to succeeed, therefore then leaving the creditor to pick up the HCEO fees.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry didn't see this response. Are we sure that the creditor has to wait for the settlement date on the judgement in respect of the transfer ?

I cannot see any requirement in the HCEO legislation, it just says that the creditor can transfer as soon as he receives the judgement.

I have no doubt that the HCEO would have to wait for the period to expire before commencing enforcement , but cannot find any restrictions regarding the instruction process.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes pretty much as I thought, i was responding to Andys point about the judgement no being moved up until after the payment date on the judgement.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I surmise " frowned on by District Judges " being the operative word PT.....its a very grey area.....even with a forthwith the given is 28 days...we had one the other day were it was 16 so can vary.

 

If the correct process is followed and successful execution is to be attained...the judgment creditor should allow a little time for payment and then seek an Order to obtain information on the judgment debtor...to decide the best option of execution...however in some instances they may already be aware of the debtors financial position..but most not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said enforcement may be applied for immediately Judgment has been given. HCEO only carries out instructions given by his Client.

Perhaps it's time to give a grace period say 7 or 14 days before Enforcement can be applied for.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I surmise " frowned on by District Judges " being the operative word PT.....its a very grey area.....even with a forthwith the given is 28 days...we had one the other day were it was 16 so can vary.

 

If the correct process is followed and successful execution is to be attained...the judgment creditor should allow a little time for payment and then seek an Order to obtain information on the judgment debtor...to decide the best option of execution...however in some instances they may already be aware of the debtors financial position..but most not.

 

I fully concur with that andyorch.

 

Last time I attended a Hearing at the RCJ the Master raised his eyes at "instant" enforcement and suggested 21 days should have been in order. Came back to bite them as all was overturned, all monies including fees had to be reimbursed & costs awarded against the creditor - payment to be made within 7 days.Served them right for being too impatient.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for late reply been going round in circles on this one.

 

 

Spoke to issuing court who just said they need to see a letter of satisfaction from creditor

and that the HCEO is working on their behalf so it is for them to tell them when to cease collection.

 

From the dates I know the CCJ was transferred up and assigned to HCEO prior to my payment being made.

 

 

The CCJ didn't give a date just said "forthwith"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure that if you paid the judgement within 28days of it being handed down

they can go bugger off! tell the court what they have done. dx

 

As already stated most judgments are payable immediately (forthwith).

 

The £111.75 is the execution costs which are £60 court fee for the Writ and £51.75 fee for the instructing solicitor.

Some new and inexperienced HCEOs do not understand the £51.75 is only applicable by a solicitor

and have been offering it to all creditors in an attempt to have a commercial advantage.

If charged correctly, this fee will all be owed.

 

If you paid after the Notice of Enforcement was issued you will also owe the Compliance Stage fee.

 

If you paid after the first visit then you will owe the Enforcement Stage 1 fee

and dependant upon what else has happened in the case you may also owe Enforcement Stage 2 fee.

 

Who are the HCEO company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As already stated most judgments are payable immediately (forthwith).

 

 

But that is just the point of concern and discussion here HCEOs ...even forthwith judgments are allowed a grace of 28 days and are not submitted to the Trust Registry until after that period.....so why are they being allowed to transfer it up to HC and execute the judgment prematurely ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I surmise " frowned on by District Judges " being the operative word PT.....its a very grey area.....even with a forthwith the given is 28 days...we had one the other day were it was 16 so can vary.

 

If the correct process is followed and successful execution is to be attained...the judgment creditor should allow a little time for payment and then seek an Order to obtain information on the judgment debtor...to decide the best option of execution...however in some instances they may already be aware of the debtors financial position..but most not.

 

The period to pay will often depend on whether the judgment is defended or by default. Most defended judgments allow 14 days to make payment whereas default judgments are payable immediately.

 

In terms of time, the creditor is not obliged to allow time for payment and neither are they to seek an order to obtain information. This is an additional cost that rarely gives them what they want as many debtors appear lie about their outgoings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But that is just the point of concern and discussion here HCEOs ...even forthwith judgments are allowed a grace of 28 days and are not submitted to the Trust Registry until after that period.....so why are they being allowed to transfer it up to HC and execute the judgment prematurely ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Hi Andy, Forthwith judgments are just that. There is no 28 days grace at present.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" The period to pay will often depend on whether the judgment is defended or by default. Most defended judgments allow 14 days to make payment whereas default judgments are payable immediately. "

 

True...the payment date is set by the claimant in an event of default judgment...

 

CPR 12 Nature of judgment where default judgment obtained by filing a request

12.5

 

(1) Where the claim is for a specified sum of money, the claimant may specify in a request filed under rule 12.4(1) –

(a) the date by which the whole of the judgment debt is to be paid; or

(b) the times and rate at which it is to be paid by instalments.

(2) Except where paragraph (4) applies, a default judgment on a claim for a specified amount of money obtained on the filing of a request, will be judgment for the amount of the claim (less any payments made) and costs –

(a) to be paid by the date or at the rate specified in the request for judgment; or

(b) if none is specified, immediately.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, Forthwith judgments are just that. There is no 28 days grace at present.

 

I would be grateful if you could source me the relevant CPR/Legislation on that point HCEO.

 

Apologies Confus3me for this Hijack on your thread but this point is very relevant to your thread

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...