Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marston & EON CCJ - bank error caused missed payment - debt now +£600 more in fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3051 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon,

 

 

a few months ago i received a letter from a company called Marston Group enforcing a High Court Writ on behalf of Eon Energy.

The total is 1144.00.

 

Since August this year i have paid 150 pounds per month to clear the balance which we both agreed

 

 

this month the direct debit did not go through (still need to speak too my bank however sick of sitting on hold today).

There was sufficient cash in my bank as far as i'm aware and still is now.

 

Today i called Marston as i received a letter from a Mr Hates (their door step agent) stating they had enforced a stage 2 fee 594 pounds!!!!

 

 

I tried too explain that there seems to be an issue with my bank and im actually calling to pay the 150.

Too which they said oh great however you will still owe 1000 odd pounds.

 

 

I asked politely if they could reverse the charge as im only a week late and its not like im saying i can't pay.

Surprise surprise they said no.

 

 

After discussing with the guy for a couple more minutes trying too explain my situation the fact that im finally getting my head above water

he turned around and said we don't care how do you think we make a profit?

I then asked too speak too a manager who couldnt help.

 

I am going too call again shortly as i was too wound up by the end of the call i just hung up.

IF i pay the 150 shortly i should have paid this month and next week too clear the balance

i feel i owe i.e. minus the 594 charges for stage 2 too the court instead of Marston

and get a reciept from the court showing that the balance is in fact paid (i'm not even sure this is possible).

 

 

Could Marston still enforce this stage 2??

 

 

i am due a sizeable bonus at LAST next week

however i do not feel i should part with 594 pounds.

 

 

I just feel this is comepletely unfair and they are preying on the vulnerable.

 

They tried to say they called and sent me a text yesterday i have not recd a missed call nor an sms

as i would have reacted like i did when i saw the letter today.

 

 

There was no mention of them adding stage 2 apart from according to them when they first sent me the original letter. (Need to dig it out).

 

 

Should they have sent another letter before sending the guy today and enforicing this stage 2 fee?

 

 

Sorry for such a long original post but

 

 

as you can imagine im livid.

 

 

Any help/ advice welcome. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

notice of enforcement letter £75 giving 7 days then

enforcement visit £235.

 

 

is that what you had?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

notice of enforcement letter £75 giving 7 days then

enforcement visit £235.

 

 

is that what you had?

 

 

dx

Wrong fee scales dx. This isn't LA work.

Compliance on this would be £90.

1st stage fee would be £190+vat+7.5% of the debt.

The second fee is also correct.

No warning letter for a default is necessary. The EA will just turn up.

The EA is quite right in that the enforcement 2 fee is the profit maker.

Enforcing for the stage two fee? I can guarantee you they can and they will. And a third fee(called sale stage) may be added which could well be over £700 if they start to remove goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe originally i did yes

 

 

however im now back at work and cannot confirm 100%.

 

 

The last letter i had was a letter from this Mr Hates stating a compliance fee of 90 pounds and a stage 1 fee of 228 pounds

giving the total as per what i mentioned above 1144.

 

 

I then called and arranged this payment plan 1st of each month 150 pounds via direct debit.

 

 

So far if i make the payment shortly for 150 i will have paid a total of 750 pounds back Today

 

 

the letter just states he visited again and added stage 2 fee

 

 

which when i called them was advised is 594 pounds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong fee scales dx. This isn't LA work.

Compliance on this would be £90.

1st stage fee would be £190+vat+7.5% of the debt.

The second fee is also correct.

No warning letter for a default is necessary. The EA will just turn up.

The EA is quite right in that the enforcement 2 fee is the profit maker.

Enforcing for the stage two fee? I can guarantee you they can and they will. And a third fee(called sale stage) may be added which could well be over £700 if they start to remove goods.

thanks silly me

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the responses so far. Grumpytosaytheleast. I definately do not have a letter from them they also confirmed to me on the phone they did not need to send a default letter. That they tried to call yesterday (i had no missed calls) and sent a text message (again nothing recd).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe originally i did yes

 

 

however im now back at work and cannot confirm 100%.

 

 

The last letter i had was a letter from this Mr Hates stating a compliance fee of 90 pounds and a stage 1 fee of 228 pounds

giving the total as per what i mentioned above 1144.

 

 

I then called and arranged this payment plan 1st of each month 150 pounds via direct debit.

 

 

So far if i make the payment shortly for 150 i will have paid a total of 750 pounds back Today

 

 

the letter just states he visited again and added stage 2 fee

 

 

which when i called them was advised is 594 pounds

 

 

so looks about right from GTSTL post

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he actually say those words -

we don't care how do you think we make a profit?

 

Was he wearing a camera?

 

Please would you mind emailing me your contact details and their Marston ref number to me on our admin email address.

It won't help you about the payment - but I can draw it to the attention of their cust.service dept and they will take it seriously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey yes im sure he said those words at this stage we were having a heat discussion

and to be honest he became quite heated as well when i asked for a manager.

 

 

I have already made a complaint anyway not sure how far that will get me.

So in short there is nothing i can do on this?

IM not sure if he was wearing a camera as i was not home when he called unfortunately.

 

 

Do you think i should ask them too prove he was actually at the address in order to enforce stage 2 fee? or is the stage 2 automatically enforced when i defaulted?

 

 

Calling my bank once i leave work in order to see what went wrong

as if they are at fault is there any chance i could get them to reimburse me for the 594 pound stage 2 fee if sufficient funds were in my account at the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you need to tell us how they got to £594.

 

Also, if the bank failed to follow your instruction without any good reason then you have a good basis for a reclaim

Link to post
Share on other sites

no he hasn't.

 

 

Could they really take my car for a debt this small?

it comes too work with me during the week

so only chance they would have for the car is at weekends

 

However my issue here is not paying the debt

come next Thursday i will be in a position to pay the whole amount

however my issue is the legitimacy of this stage 2 fee.

 

 

Can they legally enforce it?

Seems Grumpytosaytheleast has already answered this

 

 

was just curious if anyone had similar circumstance or a way of getting out of this 594 pound fee. Even if i pay it and claim it back later from the bank its not really the point. They just seem so unreasonable regarding this matter. Ok i should have checked my online banking earlier too spot the issue

 

however as soon as i did i called

 

 

would have thought they could reverse the fee

 

 

i have paid on time every other month once this arrangement was made

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't advise making the payment and then reclaiming it. Have just seen a case get vastly costlier doing this.

I have also just seen a debtors door get forced on a magi warrant because he did a chargeback on a magi fine.

 

He doesn't need to have taken control of goods to get to stage two. The visit alone will mean stage 2 kicks in. Sale stage is the only fee that needs goods to have been taken into control prior to being added.

 

They wont reverse the fee as, it would appear to me, to have been added correctly.

 

Yes. They can take your car for a debt this small if no other assets are available.

 

You can make a complaint about the how we make profit comment, it wont change your figures, but the EA may be spoken to internally. He hasn't technically done anything wrong.

 

We get people trying all manner of things to get out of fees, and most, if not all, fail, and in some cases can significantly increase the debt due.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't advise making the payment and then reclaiming it. Have just seen a case get vastly costlier doing this.

I have also just seen a debtors door get forced on a magi warrant because he did a chargeback on a magi fine.

 

He doesn't need to have taken control of goods to get to stage two. The visit alone will mean stage 2 kicks in. Sale stage is the only fee that needs goods to have been taken into control prior to being added.

 

They wont reverse the fee as, it would appear to me, to have been added correctly.

 

Yes. They can take your car for a debt this small if no other assets are available.

 

You can make a complaint about the how we make profit comment, it wont change your figures, but the EA may be spoken to internally. He hasn't technically done anything wrong.

 

We get people trying all manner of things to get out of fees, and most, if not all, fail, and in some cases can significantly increase the debt due.

 

Like it or not Grumpy is correct in what he says.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get evidence from your bank as to what happened with that instalment. They will be able to tell you whether the Debit was requested (DD payments have to be requested by the payee's account, while Standing Orders are sent FROM the payer automatically). If they can provide evidence that it was NOT requested, it is Marston's fault, and you would have a justifiable claim against them for the additional charges. If it WAS requested, and your bank refused payment, you need to find out why that was. If you had sufficient funds in your account, your bank is at fault and you will have a claim against them for the losses you have incurred. If you did NOT have sufficient funds, it's down to you ... and experience!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...