Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

blemain/together mortgage - now on 3rd eviction notice - Friday 11th Dec


maggie60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1894 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Before I complete the revised WS can l just check a few things regarding the procedure at the hearing.

 

I should know this by now, but the last hearing in March 2017 seems a lifetime away. IIRC, the order of events will be?

 

1. DJ reads my application

2. DJ asks me a series of relevant questions - how we got behind, etc. Will I have any wriggle room here to add any bits I am taking off the WS and may be little OT?

3. DJ asks Claimant's rep a series of questions - how much was the last payment etc. I will not be allowed to interrupt and will get a scolding if I do, as in previous hearings?

4. DJ will summarise and give decision.

5. If the DJ declines my application, would I be able to get an extension to the eviction date? This is why I need to have the WS as perfect as I can make it.

Edited by maggie60a
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just a couple more questions:

 

1. Should I stop harping on about my angina?

2. The two projects I mentioned were deferred - one to mid-January and the other I am just finishing. I have had to buy iPads etc. for this and will not be paid until mid-February for one, and early March for the other. I am unlikely to be paid if they find I no longer have an office (I work from home).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upload when your ready

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its unapproved only Site Team can view it...try refreshing your screen

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

CMI...compound monthly interest ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, paragraph 4 - you have the words "the arrears" twice one after the other. I still think it's too long and too detailed, does the judge really need to know about the medicine your husband has been taking or that you intend to use equity release.

 

I would suggest you just say how you got into the situation of missing payments, and concentrate on how you are going to pay going forward. That is what the judge will base his decision on. All other details are just that, details.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m sorry if this thread is getting a little tedious and appears self-inflicted, but we did have everything under control until my husband became ill in November and I would appreciate a little help.

 

As Ell-en says the judge is only interested in two factors – how I got behind with payments and how I intend to resolve it.

 

My memory isn’t great - will I only be able to answer direct questions from the judge? I want to have the opportunity to say sometime along the lines of:

 

“In December 2017, Blemain took out an eviction notice against us, which was only stopped when we were able to replay a recorded conversation where a member of the collections team agreed to stop any action if the Court payments were brought up to date in December. Yet they have failed to repay the costs they applied for this despite it being their error.

 

Blemain were recently fined over £1.2million by the FSA and ordered to repay £2m to clients who were treated unfairly when in arrears. Their CEO was forced to step down and their Head of Compliance banned from having any significant influence within the company.

 

Amongst sub-prime lenders their reputation is synonymous with cases of malpractice and there is little incentive for Blemain to obtain anywhere near the market value of our home if the eviction goes ahead. The balance they are claiming is outstanding represents around 10% of the house’s true value and I am sure many costs will be added to increase the debt.

 

Furthermore, I believe their balance has been considerably inflated by unfair fees and interest charges on those fees. Their standard monthly arrears fee of £50, if added in January 2011, with interest would currently stand at £130.66, rising to £251.80 by the end of the loan and to £459.28 by the time the loan is fully repaid. I believe these are adding around £3,500 on the current balance and considerably increasing the time it will take to repay the loan. If our application is successful, once the arrears are cleared I would take out a subject access request to review any fees we feel unwarranted and challenge these.”

Or is that just too much detail for a 15/20 minute hearing and not really relevant?

 

Sometimes you are just too close to a problem to see it clearly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have very little opportunity to tell the judge much at all. He/she may ask a few questions but as I said before, the judge's main purpose is to decide if there is a good chance you can maintain payments towards the arrears in addition to the normal monthly payment.

 

What date did you get for the hearing ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, make sure you get to the court in plenty of time and ask if there are any duty legal advisors - they can accompany you into the hearing and support your case. If the lender's solicitor approaches you and tries to get you to agree to anything, just say you'd rather let the judge decide.

 

Good luck, stay positive.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Things won't go badly - you'll be fine - I'd suggest you get there for 9.30

 

In the event of the unthinkable happening you could ask the judge for time to move, do you have any children living in the property?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All good!

 

Haven't been well over the last few days, so had to send mrmaggie off to represent me and according to him not a nice hearing, as one would expect on warrant no 7 (according to Blemain), no, 6 according to me, but I did think we were on no. 8.

 

He got the duty legal bod to help him as ell-en suggested and fortunately Blemain's rep was the legal equivalent of Ryanair, asking the judge for lots and getting absolutely nothing. They really do pay peanuts and get monkeys.

 

The judge agreed the application on two main grounds:

 

1. During the last two years we have reduced the arrears by £2,400.

2. The equity in the house is 10x greater than the secured charges (2 mortgages) against it.

 

I have been trying to find if there is any point in chasing the "unfair" charges Blemain make and cannot find any successful cases - anyone know of any?

 

Thanks for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...