Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we certainly don't advise tipping them off providing anything that might 'play your cards' and elude to what your WS might contain at the defence stage.  
    • and as expected   UK rejects mobility agreement with Europe to help young people travel and live abroad WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour also rejected the possibility of an EU-wide scheme for young people a Government spokesperson said there was no interest from the UK side, adding that “free movement (for UK plebs) within the EU was ended”.
    • Yep, I agree with what you are saying, I only mentioned the governing body code of practice as a nod to the fact that I wasn't dismissing the BPA or whoever out of hand, thought that would go in my favour before a judge. I wrote a long post about the BPA CoP earlier but then deleted it because I realised I wasn't talking about points of law but a set of guidelines drawn up by one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans. It is ludicrous that the 5 minute consideration period doesn't apply if the motorist parks, such nonsense. As for legislation, I was referring to the government legislation (if it is legislation?) document which has been withdrawn. Does that stand until it has been reintroduced? In the explanatory document it is quite clear. Otherwise, how does one hold them to the consideration and grace periods? Or is that at the discretion of the judge?
    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

blemain/together mortgage - now on 3rd eviction notice - Friday 11th Dec


maggie60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1895 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Glad it went well. If they do send you a statement of charges you'll need to check it with a fine toothcomb and check the interest on them.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you for moving the post, bet it was dx.

 

Hope it help others realise there is light at the end of the tunnel.

 

OH only just mentioned that as he left court yesterday, he was approached by someone (who looked more like a trainee solicitor than an estate agent) and asked "Are you Mr sara55? I am from xyz property services and we buy properties for cash........"

 

His only comfort, whoever she was, was that it was raining very heavily and she was absolutely drenched.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear God, is there no depths to which these kind of people will stoop !:-x

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is usually a list in the court waiting room with the hearings for that day - she most probably read that

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are referred to as ambulance chasers Sara...wouldn't worry about it:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno might help being in the same thread might inspire people...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OH only just mentioned that as he left court yesterday, he was approached by someone (who looked more like a trainee solicitor than an estate agent) and asked "Are you Mr sara55? I am from xyz property services and we buy properties for cash........"

 

His only comfort, whoever she was, was that it was raining very heavily and she was absolutely drenched.

 

I wouldn't normally suggest violence but I could be tempted to make an exception for a slimeball like that!!!

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno might help being in the same thread might inspire people...

 

OK will do, so long as you don't say I have put it in the wrong section.

 

From what I can see from CAG and other websites, they charge interest on the charges, which is fair enough. If my bank made charges and these weren't repaid I would accept that interest was accruable on that.

 

However, if my bank made charges and did not advise me of these and made it virtually impossible to find them (as Blemain or whatever they are calling themselves this week do), I would be a very unhappy bunny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK will do, so long as you don't say I have put it in the wrong section.

 

From what I can see from CAG and other websites, they charge interest on the charges, which is fair enough. If my bank made charges and these weren't repaid I would accept that interest was accruable on that.

 

However, if my bank made charges and did not advise me of these and made it virtually impossible to find them (as Blemain or whatever they are calling themselves this week do), I would be a very unhappy bunny.

 

No worries, Sara - we will keep a note that dx told you to post at the end of this thread :lol:

 

Sadly these sub prime mortgage lenders, tend to set people up to fail and will add charges / admin charges at the drop of a hat ! It is how they make their money :(

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

their "hidden" fees cannot be challenged?

I get an annual statement and they are not shown is that acceptable

- has nobody ever successfully challenged a sub prime outfit like Blemain?

And is the change of name voluntarily or through necessity?

 

We believe the reason Blemain lose so many applications in court

(reading through various forums)

is because of the blatant lies they tell in court.

 

I was able to email a statement from Blemain received just before he went into the hearing, (not the full one we have requested, but enough to help).

 

The young, inexperienced (very cheap knowing them) clerk representing Blemain, lied saying the last three payments in seven months we made were for £600, £1800 and £120.

 

Mr sara55 was able to show that the £120 was for arrears and a payment for £1,080 to cover 2 monthly payments was received immediately AFTER it.

 

He says this is what made up the judges mind.

It was 50/50 prior to them tripping themselves up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Unfortunately, I never did get around to getting a statement from them and we are back to square one again three months behind with the court payments as business was quiet since November.

 

We have taken on a couple of new contracts in the last month and we have two large payments due in next month and July.

 

I have made an appointment to take the N244 form to the court early Monday. Should I offer to make three payments in April and two in July as well as the normal monthly payment for March, May and June.

 

This will mean that by July I would be up to date with all payment since the order on Dec 2015 plus reduced the arrears by over £1,500.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get an sar running

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will give you every single piece of paperwork they hold involving you + the complete picture.

not what they CHOOSE to send.

 

 

SAR is a LEGAL request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the eviction is Thursday morning, I am trying for a Tuesday or Wednesday hearing.

 

I need to start on the N244 shortly as I need to hand it in early tomorrow.

 

Will I confuse issues by offer the 3x monthly next month and 2x in July?

I know court prefer a steady monthly figure.

 

Grateful for any thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, affixed are the forms you need. Shout up if you need any help

n244_0400.pdf

Budget Sheet.xls

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

both are in the mortgage section of our library or the legal section

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My hearing is tomorrow, a day before the eviction.

 

 

I think Blemain have upped their game to go for the jugular. New solicitors and regular texts which I have not responded to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

usually means they are trying to frighten you

we typically find the more they shout

the less they think they have a strong case

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"the less they think they have a strong case"

 

 

I think in going three payments behind with the court order it may not be as weak as I would like. I checked and just over half way through the load I have paid them £53k.

 

I wonder if anyone can offer any advice on a couple of issues I want to clear at tomorrows hearing:

 

We have calculated that the original loan if repaid within the 15 year period we took it out for appears to be based on a much larger figure than we took out.

 

 

I am simply calculating the interest of 12.75% on the previous month's balance and deducting the monthly payment.

 

 

To get it down to £0 by month 180 the original loan is well over £4,000 more than the advance.

 

 

Now I am sure Blemain would have added admin charges etc. to the loan, and the broker added a charge, but they were nowhere near this figure.

 

Should I prepare a letter for the court (and copy for Blemain's rep) about this or would it be better to ask about this in court?

 

 

I know this would be made clear if I had requested a SAR as dx suggested, but I don't have the time.

 

For all I know, the judge may say "You've had enough chances Sara, you're out tomorrow!" but I am trying to remain positive.

 

 

If my application is successful, am I correct in thinking the loan will continue, even after end of the loan period, at the same monthly rate until repaid?

 

 

With the arrears and an interest rate of 12.75% pa the loan will take an extra three and a half years to repay, so I will have to keep paying a good bit on top even after the arrears are clear to reduce this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Hope this does not arrive too late

 

Contest the amount they say you owe. if you contest the amount and ask for an adjournment untill they prove the true amount outstanding.

 

Raise doubt in the judges mind that there may be money owing to you from unfair charges and unfair interest. If you are asked say you cant prove it because they have not provided a clear and understandable breakdown of fees charges and penalties and there may be unjust interest added to the added chargies.

 

Add the amount of over charge may be more than the amount you have outstanding.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...