Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

lowell/carter claimform - argos storecard 'debt' ***Claim Struck Out***


Rebkayskye
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this is the wrong place, can you please move it for me admin if I am wrong.

 

I suspect my DCA (Lowell) cant provide a CCA.

I submitted my defence online already regarding a debt for £800 as I don't remember the debt

and nobody can tell me if they have or haven't got a copy of the CCA.

 

 

My defence is that without a CCA the debt is not enforceable.

If my DCA go to a hearing is it essential that I turn up to the court in person or can I send a statement or letter.

This is worrying me sick because I don't know what to do.

I am unemployed with 3 children and I don't drive.

 

Also I have been sent a letter from Bryan Carter on behalf of Lowell that they would like to proceed

and have offered "negotiation and mediation.

 

 

I rang them today and they suggested a Tomlin order.

Forms need to be sent back to Northampton court by 17th December.

 

Feeling out of my depth and don't want to make the wrong decision.

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG Rebkayskye

 

If you could read and copy the following thread and post your responses here along side the points ...to enable the correct advice on how to proceed.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

Name of the Claimant ? Bryan Carter on behalf of Lowell

 

Date of issue – 2nd Oct 2015 (+19 days 20th oct) (+ 14 days 3rd November)

 

What is the claim for – The claimants claim is for the sum of £720, being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under an agreement regulated by the CCA act 1974 between the defendant and Home Retail Group.(xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) and assigned to the claimant on 01/07/2014, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

The defendant failed to maintain contractual repayment under the terms of the agreement and a default notice which has been served which has not been complied with.

 

And the claimant claims £720

 

The claimant also claims statutory interest persuant to S.69 of the county act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment of the agreement to date but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of 1000 mounting to £57

 

What is the value of the claim? £720

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Store card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Approx 2001

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No I didn't

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not to my knowledge

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? I haven't made any payments to DCA but stopped paying argos because I disputed the debt

 

What was the date of your last payment? approx Jan 2011 to argos

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Dispute never opened

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes because it scared me but I stopped at the date above

 

 

 

I sent a CCA request to Bryan carter because my claim forms said all correspondence should be to them and Lowell transferred me to BC when I rang them. I did not received a copy of a CCA and a defence was submitted to Northampton court. I have now received a letter regarding mediation and unsure what my next step should be.

 

Thanks again in advance, I hope what I wrote it ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would be extremely lucky to get the original agreement for this.

 

Carter knows it, but will go ahead with court action anyway

. He just wants his fee.

 

Once you call his bluff, he runs off fast and leaves it for the creditor to sort out, who usually bails at the last minute.

 

Lowell also try to harass you in the waiting room in court as well to try and get you to break down before you go in.

 

They know they are wrong, but it doesnt stop their greedy hands from trying.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rebkayskye,

 

I cant seem to copy the link here, maybe because im using my phone

but if you go to the search above right and type "no CCA defence"

 

a few threads appear which show the outcomes of previous cases where lowell/carter have been the claimant, have a read through some of them and you should get the gist.

 

Im assuming you have sent a CCA request and have allowed enough time for them to hang themselves.

If so your defence is no credit agreement, no debt to enforce.

 

Im sure andyorch who is vastly more knowledgeable will pop along with a more thorough answer for you but for now,

 

have a look at the similar threads as you will need to get your head around it to proceed effectively with mediation,

 

should it get that far.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebkayskye

 

So you have submitted your defence and done the necessary CCA requests.....have you received/submitted a Directions Questionnaire (N180) yet?

 

This transfers the claim from Northampton to your local county court and places it in the small claims track.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing to panic about

 

But you really need to stop phoning these fleecers

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I sent a cca request on 8th October by recorded delivery

 

 

then waited about 15 days before submitting my defence to the court.

 

 

I have not received anything from lowell/Bryan carter other than a letter to negotiate.

 

 

I admit that I rang and they offered me a tomlin order but my gut tells me not to.

 

 

I'll read through some other threads but I'm unsure if I should ask advice from the CAB.

Is that wise?

 

Oh and yes I received the "mediaion" paperwork from the court yesterday and I'm unsure where my nearest county court is so it can be transferred.

 

 

I'm in wales so travelling to Northampton is out of the question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The mediation once set (Just a phone interview) will ask you have you got the necessary paperwork from Farters (Carters) when you say yes or No, No would mean they would no doubt stop mediation and pass case back to court, Carters then send missive letters and Usually Discontinues just before a case so they can get their court fee back, but they hope you cave in before that stage, or not respond to court procedure and get a CCJ by default .

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to sound dim bit what do I have to do?

 

 

I have the mediation questionaire paperwork from the court but nothing else recent besides a letter from carter which came last week.

 

 

Would anyone be able to advise me the best way to fill out the paperwork for the court because it needs to be submitted by Dec 17th. It is all so confusing to me.

 

Thank you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

All parties are expected to participate in Mediationlink3.gif...irrespective.

 

Tick yes to mediation...although nothing may come of it...yes to small claimslink3.gif Track and state your local county courtlink3.gif.

The rest is self explanatory...file with the court by the date stated and send a copy to the Claimants Solicitor.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring your Magistrate Court Reb and ask for the Local County Court address

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need stop panicking

you know when you sent it

that's all that matters

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to guess...just read other similar threads from the same claimant/solicitor.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...