Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/Howard Cohen - Santander Overdraft


Ty1874
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2888 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have recently received a questionnaire from the court in regards to a claim logged by Howard Cohen in May 2015.

 

To make a long story short

they lodged a claim

I acknowledged the claim with embarrassed response. (see Below)

 

1. The particulars of claim discloses no cause of action and are self evidently an abuse of process, in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR (even allowing for the constraints of the bulk issue system).

 

2. The defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

4. Further to that above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

 

5. I respectfully request the court’s permission to submit an amended defence should the claimant file a fully particularised Particulars of Claim and the documents requested.

 

On Friday last week I received the questionnaire as well as a copy of default a statement and copy of agreement..

Do I now need to log a new defence or have they won because of the documents provided?

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Welcome to CAGlink31.gif Rebkayskye

 

If you could read and copy the following thread and post your responses here along side the points ...to enable the correct advice on how to proceed.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...ecember-2014**

 

Regards

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you could redact and scan up the agreement etc to please into ONE multipage word doc to and save to PDF.

 

 

follow the upload

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Name of Claimant - Hoist/ Howard Cohen

Value of claim £2274.

Claim is for an overdraft.

 

Original agreement entered before 2007. ( Bank account opened in 2001)

 

Claim issued by the debt purchaser - Hoist

 

Notice of assignment received from Santander.

 

No yearly statutory notices as far as I am aware.

 

Payments ceased as I was experiencing financial difficulties

 

Made a payment plan with Stepchange but they cancelled the plan due to missed payment.

I have recently return the small claims questionnaire.

I also received a pack from Howard Cohen containing the notice of transfer, notice of default

and a copy of the bank account opening agreement although no documentation has been provided for the overdraft.

 

The claim was originally issued in March and I replied with the embarrassed acknowledgement.

After which I didnt hear anything more so I assumed the claim was stayed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that both parties have submitted their DQ,s (N180) the Court will send you a Notice of Allocation...read this carefully as it will contain directions on how you are to proceed with the claim in preparation for trial.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that both parties have submitted their DQ,s (N180) the Court will send you a Notice of Allocation...read this carefully as it will contain directions on how you are to proceed with the claim in preparation for trial.

 

Andy

 

 

Ok so do I stand a chance of actually winning this or would it be better to go down the mediation route?

 

I will post the paperwork I have received from them later today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you opt for mediation on your DQ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you opt for mediation on your DQ?

 

Yes I did..... in your opinion would it be better to mediate? or do I need to request they provide specific paperwork in relation to the overdraft?

 

Not really sure of what the next steps are - also will I get a chance to file a new defence as the original claim was the embarrassed defence. I have also changed my address since the claim form has been issued - I have advised the court of the change of address do I also need to advise Howard Cohen?

 

Can I request disclosure of how much they paid for the debt?

 

Thanks for you help.

Edited by Ty1874
.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mediation is helpful in all cases...to narrow any differences and even possibly reach an amicable settlement...its not a weakness or an admittance and is part of the process leading to any trial.

 

It may be prudent to advise the the Claimants Solicitor of your change of address...as they may wish to contact you and make an offer or compromise.

 

With regards to disclosure you normally send a CPR 31.14 before you submit your defence....if your defence has put them to strict proof to disclose...normally the court will also direct disclosure within the Notice of Allocation.

 

Lastly no you cant ask how much they paid for the debt...that is irrelevant in defending a claim.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help!

 

So at what point would a defence be logged as I have gone with the embarrassed defence?

 

 

also as they have provided the original agreement?

 

 

notice of Allocation would it be of any use to still send a CPR 31.14?

 

Thanks again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 3 please

what have they sent?

theres no agreement with an overdraft

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hoist documents attached...

Account application form

Recall of overdraft

Notice of assignment -

They have also sent a make up statement of account transaction but I have not added that to the attachment.

 

To add I have just realised they have the incorrect date of birth on my bank application.

 

Does this have any implications?

Edited by Ty1874
Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 31 tends to lose its effectiveness post defence...but you can if you wish.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Happy New Year All,

 

Can anyone advise me on the next steps based on the paperwork I have received?

 

Do howard cohen need to produce a overdraft agreement?

Is the agreement invalid as they have an incorrect date of birth?

 

I have received a call from mediation but they have cancelled as they have been unable to contact Howard Cohen.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you actually have a new court date ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I would like to know based on the documents I have uploaded what my chances are in court?

 

Also do they need to provide further proof of overdraft? agreement and rates etc...

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Update

 

I have today received a general form of judgement or order.

 

it stats that action is stayed until 20th April during which time the parties should try and settle.

 

 

The claimant should then contact the court by 20th April oi notify the court in writing of the outcome.

Failure to comply or engage properly may result in the application of sanctions.

 

If a settlement is reached a consent order should be signed by all parties.

 

It also say because this Order has been made without considering representations from either party

- the parties can have the order set aside, varied or stayed.

 

What is my next move?

do I wait to hear from hoist? and if so do I enter negotiation?

 

Thanks foe any help in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" What is my next move? do I wait to hear from hoist? and if so do I enter negotiation? "

 

Yes or you can approach them...and see what they are prepared to offer.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is...but should mediation fail then the claim proceeds to trial

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject to the courts directions...should mediation fail..sometimes the court stipulate that either party must inform the court that its failed...so check your directions carefully...each court words it differently.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep - thats what it states - we have until the 20th of April.

 

 

If no conclusion has been reached Hoist have to inform them in writing by 4pm on that day.

I have been through the other threads here but not sure what would be an acceptable resolution..

maybe 3% of the balance with the stipulation that they take it off of my record and cannot resell it?..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep - thats what it states - we have until the 20th of April. If no conclusion has been reached Hoist have to inform them in writing by 4pm on that day. I have been through the other threads here but not sure what would be an acceptable resolution.. maybe 3% of the balance with the stipulation that they take it off of my record and cannot resell it?..

 

They are the claimant...let them conduct and negotiate any acceptable settlement figures...of course you can always say no:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...