Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
    • saying the thread is locked, what shall I do?
    • Please fill in the forum sticky and upload a copy of the invoice, redacted of anything that could identify you -  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Money Claim online against The Coffee Shop for coffee machine


Cypriotxx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok so you have received the Directions Questionnaire (DQ) from the Court. This is fairly straightforward to complete.

 

If you choose to file a Reply to Defence (it's optional) then you must file it at Court and serve on the Defendant with your completed DQ.

 

Now tell us, is there truth in the Defendant's claim that you wouldn't send it back at first and wanted to get a refund and keep hold of it and send it to the new buyer directly yourself?

 

Also, why did you not fully check the specifications of the equipment before purchasing it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i understand, thnx

 

when we realized that it needs 3phase electric connection we asked how do we go about this and he suggest different alternatives and they were not good ., and we send a text to ask would you like us to dispatch the item from here to your new buyer we dont mind doing that to save us money , and from that text to the starting the court we been ignored , called so many times and he never get back to us till the moment i started the moneyonline court process and email them and they started to write back and fore .... thats when they suggested that i should chose the option where its says settled so once i do that they would send my money back ..(even tho they received their item ) thats why i was like no i dont trust this guys now what if they wont send my money back ... and here we are now.... if you look at the specs there is no mention of 3phase electricity needed :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a Judge would say it was your fault for not checking or researching the product before purchasing. Unless of course you directly asked the Defendant and they misled you about the 3 phase electricity (which I don't think is the case here).

 

How long did you give the Defendant before starting the Court claim? Did you send the Defendant a "Letter Before Action" or notify them in writing that you were intending to go to Court?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough, and they accept some delay on their part.

 

The thing I am struggling with is will a Judge think it's reasonable for you to have a refund in full and keep the item and post it on yourself instead of sending it back to the Defendant? I struggle to see how this would have been a viable option as the Defendant would have needed to check the item again before reselling it to someone else.

 

So on what basis do you believe that you are entitled to a full refund plus a refund of the postage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this will be a walkover. The product is advertised as 'commercial'. Most commercial equipment will be 3 phase and very rarely will you find a domestic premises with a 3 phase electrical supply so you needed to check out your intended purchase more carefully.

 

The 'I will send it on to the next purchaser' really is a no no. That would have made the equipment second hand and with no guarantee that the equipment worked and who would be responsible for a return if that was the case plus, of course, they are fully entitled to have the equipment in their hands to be checked that it is the same one they sent you, has not been used or abused and is in full working order before supplying to another customer.

 

This isn't faulty equipment but a mis-purchase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont refuse the option of mediation...all parties are expected to participate....irrespective of the outcome.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...