Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello and thank you for the detailed answer.   I have checked that website. The MPRN matches with my bill and the gas supplier appears as EON. Then, out of curiosity I checked my neighbour supplier. I know that they have the electricity with EON based on their smart meter, but their gas supplier is British Gas. I do not know how frequent it is to have different suppliers. Either way, It seems like EON is supplying my flat (based on those numbers), but I still have doubts with regards to which one is my meter and whether I am right when thinking that I am using the wrong meter.   Any suggestions  from this point?       Hi! Thanks for the answer. I am afraid I will have to do it. I just want to be certain before going down that road. Additionally, how will they evaluate my consumption if there is no initial reading to estimate from?   Many thanks!!
    • Hi thanks for the reply and good point. Well after I run the HPI check, I read a lot and also came to know TAX is not transferable, so I went to the gov.uk web and paid the tax in full for the whole year. Since then, I tried to exhaust the web for any information related to this car and made a list of past owners (because I am not sure who holds the title with Moneybarn since Moneybarn will only declare a good faith title if I purchased the car from their customer). So in total there are 5 registered keepers/owners of the car  (incl. myself). From the service records I traced the first ever driver/owner, he said he returned the car to Mercedes, so it means he leased it and the car was registered with a lease/finance company. I could not get details from Keeper 2, but it seems he sold the car after 3 months. Keeper/owner-3 also no details but he sold the car after 12/13 months. Keeper/owner-4 is the seller I purchased the car from. Keeper/Owner-5 is myself.   I tried to trace more and more and used google tools as much as I could, and found out that the car was advertised on July 2020 and Aug-2020 by a car dealer in Sussex on Gumtree! And the car was sold by them on the 29 Aug 2020...so most likely it was sold to Keeper/Owner-4, from whom I purchased the car.   So I made a list of past owners and tried to identify who could hold the title with Moneybarn...after weighing in my assumptions and findings, I came to the conclusion that Keeper/Owner-4 may hold the title. And since the car was advertised by a car-dealer, then I assume they should have run an HPI check. Maybe, just maybe, Keeper/Owner-3 may have traded in his car at this dealer and the car dealer took the Mercedes in as p/x exchange.   So today, i will drive down to the car dealer in Sussex, and try to find out more. If Keeper/Owner holds the title, then I have a better chance to get a Good Faith title from Moneybarn. I never thought I would run into this nightmare but I am weighing down my options, if I have to loose the car, I will try to loose it royally and drive around EU before returning it in the most deplorable state I can.   But then again, if Keeper/Owner holds the title, and he does not default his payments to Moneybarn, can they still repossess the car?
    • Thanks for the reply, BankFodder.   So far I've spent just the £52 on delivery. He sells a lot of stuff on eBay but I think he's classed as a private seller. 
    • Do not pay any money to try and get them off your back. Keep on clawing your money back as well as you can. You seem to be doing pretty well so far. You are lucky that you didn't pay by bank transfer – as most people do.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

DVLA court summons letter for no insurance after SORN date


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1800 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hope someone can help with a SORN question.

 

To cut a very long story short

 

my son's car became undriveable so bought another.

Phoned DVLA after getting a fine

 

what he needed to do to SORN it as he hadn't received the log book from the DVLA and couldn't do it online.

He was told to send in a letter which he did.

 

After a couple of months he got a summons from Stevenage Court for not having insurance.

He wrote to them and explained he'd sent a letter and lo and behold,

notification and tax refund was received the next day and dated back to the receipt by them of the letter.

 

He has now just received a further letter saying that as the SORN was backdated

the offence of no insurance still stands albeit well after the date that the vehicle has been SORN'd.

 

He has an acknowledgment from them stating "Your SORN starts on 11/09/2015"

Summons states that he had no insurance on the 6/10/2015??

 

Is this legal??

Surely if the vehicle has an official SORN date and the tax refunded back to the 11th,

how then can they say it was uninsured after that time?

 

 

Any help would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like I have posted this in the wrong forum so am posting here as well as the General Motoring Forum. Hope this doesn't mess things up too much.

 

 

Hope someone can help with a SORN question. To cut a very long story short my son's car became undriveable so bought another. Phoned DVLA after getting a fine what he needed to do to SORN it as he hadn't received the log book from the DVLA and couldn't do it online. He was told to send in a letter which he did. After a couple of months he got a summons from Stevenage Court for not having insurance. He wrote to them and explained he'd sent a letter and lo and behold, notification and tax refund was received the next day and dated back to the receipt by them of the letter.

 

 

He has now just received a further letter saying that as the SORN was backdated the offence of no insurance still stands albeit well after the date that the vehicle has been SORN'd. He has an acknowledgment from them stating "Your SORN starts on 11/09/2015" Summons states that he had no insurance on the 6/10/2015??

 

 

Is this legal?? Surely if the vehicle has an official SORN date and the tax refunded back to the 11th, how then can they say it was uninsured after that time?

 

 

Any help would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did he have valid insurance upto the date the car was eventually SORN?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid not, that's why he got a fine but the case file states that he did not have insurance on the 6th October. The SORN acknowledgement states that the vehicle was SORN'd on the 11th September.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but he has not got a fine yet?

 

 

or is this two things?

 

 

he was fined for xxxx offence

 

 

now he has an additional summons for no insurance for a date passed sorn date?

 

 

your posts are a bit confusing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My apologies, tried to cut to the chase but left out a ton of history.

 

 

Original fine was failure to Insure because it hadn't been SORN'd dated 22nd June.

 

 

He paid this and wrote a letter as advised by the DVLA stating he wished to SORN it on the 11th Sept.

after much correspondence because they had never sent him a log book.

 

 

It is the same offence but the summons is for an offence which is indeed past the SORN date.

 

 

Having written to them again they maintain that the vehicle was declared SORN on the 27th October and was backdated as requested, which is probably when they processed it as opposed to when they received the letter.

 

 

request to backdate was made asking for it to be backdated to the date of receipt of the letter.

Edited by ABONE
Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be missing something but it seems to me that if you are being summonsed for no insurance on a specific date (6 October) you plead Not Guilty on the basis that on that date insurance was not required as the vehicle was under SORN.

 

 

And as evidence, produce to the Court the DVLA letter stating the SORN commenced from 11 September

(take several photocopies for the Clerk and each of the Magistrates),

adding it's status remained unchanged on 6 October.

 

The fact the letter confirming the SORN commenced 11 September was itself dated after 6 October should be an irrelevant distraction. Irrespective of the letter's date, it is confirming DVLA's acceptance it was SORN from 11 September. End of matter!

 

It is difficult to get DVLA to understand or accept they made an error, so trying to explain to them at this stage is generally useless. They may be interested in settling at the Court room door if they see/hear your defence (not that you are obliged to do this).

 

If you plead Not Guilty and the Magistrates accept this, don't forget to ask for your own costs - and let us know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many Thanks Tony P.

 

 

From their letter these are the phrases which I think are pertinent

 

 

" When declaring a SORN the DVLA will send you an acknowledgement within 28 days confirming receipt

and subsequent update of your SORN application, (Didn't happen, more like 60)

 

 

it also states that you should contact the DVLA if you are not in receipt an acknowledgement letter.

(Don't see where this is a requirement in law)

 

"Until such time as an acknowledgement of SORN letter is received the registered keeper

cannot assume their vehicle has been SORN"

 

" Your have stated in your correspondence that you vehicle was SORN at the time of the offence.

This is not the case, your declared SORN on the 27/10/2015,

(Not true, this is when they printed it out which was 4 weeks after the declaration n was sent to them)

and you requested that it be backdated to the 11/9/2015.

(Again not true, the request was to refund the tax from the date the letter was received by them)

 

"Your legal responsibility did not end until you received confirmation of your SORN from the DVLA."

 

So if their database and acknowledgement state that is was SORN on the 11/9/2015

how can it not be effective after that date??

 

I'm confused with their logic and would be very grateful of some clarity.

You make more sense to me Tony but then its the DVLA.

I'm just still unsure of the legal position.

 

Any further help gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...