Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Has he broken the law?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Trying to help a friend of mine who has got himself into a bit of bother

 

He is an events manager, and runs events for a venue

 

The venue pay him and he in turn puts the nights on/ pays the acts etc,

he has never had any form of contract with them

- not sure if that makes a difference-

he ran 5 shows so far all of which he was praised for the quality of etc

 

A few months ago he was contacted by an agent of a big name act who offered to supply him with some very decent acts to try new material out

- at a higher level than he was currently,

he put this to the venue and they paid my friend to organise/ promote it,

they also paid for a range of 2016 shows.

The total of which came to £13500

 

The issue he had was at the same time baliffs etc have been visiting his home demanding money,

he used the above money to pay them and as a result does not have that money anymore.

 

 

He then discovered that the agent that promised the acts and he had the agreement with was doing so without the acts behalf

- he contacted an act who had no knowledge of it

- he contacted Action Fraud and has a reference number for it

 

Fast forward to a month later and he has had an email from the venue to say they are going to both the police and civil routes to recoup the money

as he has not used the funds for the intended purpose

 

He is in a position that he can repay in full within 3 months which they have rejected

 

Now obviously I dont for a second believe he booked it fraudulently and the fact he went straight to Action Fraud

I believe shows this but have they got a case against him with regards to him spending the money on the baliff company

, if the shows had gone ahead he would have been in a position to pay it all as planned by the time the nights came along

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think it is a civil contract issue, as he is not an employee of the venue using their money. He was paid the money as a private contractor to perform an verbal contract, which he failed to do. The venue can sue him for breach of contract, which they may well win. A contract does not need to be in writing, but if it is just verbal, it makes it more difficult to enforce.

 

Your friend will end up in the same position again, with a CCJ and bailiffs looking to enforce. Perhaps they need to think whether they can continue to work as they are, as the entertainment trade is well known for such issues.

 

Best advice is for him to offer payment in writing, with a first payment made. Then it makes it more difficult to be taken to court, as he can evidence repayment was offered.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much as the vast majority of advice on this and some other forums is first rate why not try to find a solicitor who will do a free initial consultation just to put his made at rest . I agree with what has been said but I am not qualified in law , have never studied it and most certainly wouldn't pretend to be an expert.

 

If the venue is serious, it may be even worth seeing if a solicitor will write a letter for a modest fee . Any solicitor worth their salt will advise you if using them is necessary of a waste of money.

On that I can talk from personal experience , I paid £90 to check I was doing everything legally when my estranged wife died but was told that while they would do it for me I was more than capable of doing it myself .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...