Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • surely it should not matter.  as long as a driver is insured to driver the car. the V5C RK name does not have to match . then you can take as long as it takes. 
    • Today I received a MCOL  claim notification havent been able to log on to see what he put in the claim He has failed to provide information required  pre action I have not received bill or details of what the other builder has done I have not receieved a letter before action  I had a verbal request to pay half of the new builders re-work  cost  I received an email stating if I didnt pay within 72 hours he would make a claim against me in the county court I did offer to pay £300 for the snagging which in my opinion was sufficient to cover any labour or materials on the minor items He went ahead and re worked the whole of the bathroom area without discussing it with me He has made a claim for £2400 He had taken it upon himself to carry out all of the works without recourse or discussion with me, other than an email saying he wasnt happy with some of the finish surrounding acurved wall and an extractor duct he stated he had lost confidnce in me and had appointed someone elase to carry out the work The original cost of the full garage conversion was £10400, building control were fully involved and passed all inspections I quoted in writing detailing the work I would carry out with a single price for the whole job no photos of the finished job he has taken lots of photos and videos but not shared them with me onlymeagain  
    • Evening All I am now working on pulling together my bundle of docs for Court (it needs to be submitted by 8 July) and have three parts I'd be most grateful for your thoughts on please. The first is a time line / case summary, the second concerns Items Not In Dispute and the third (I hope) sets out where P2Gs insistence that they are only liable for the first £20 of any claim falls foul of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and also cites three cases where different judges found against P2G and ParcelHero Ltd when they attempted to argue their very limited liabilty was warranted. Anonymised pdfs of all three sections are attached. Given that in their Defendant's Response P2G appear to have conceeded that the eventually delivered parcel was empty, and that the contents had not been handled with due care and attention, do I need the amount of detail I have included in the summary document, or do you consider a significantly shortened version would suffice? As ever, many thanks g59 Description of unenfoceable insurance requirements for my bundle.pdf Issues Not In Dispute - anonymised.pdf P2G Timeline and case summary - anonymised.pdf
    • the temp frozen bank A/C will be under the money laundering rules. he must be transferring large sums of money in/out a UK bank account from abroad and the automatic system has fagged him. now he must wait for a human to intervein.  can take anything upto 2mts see the barclays forum. you cant get a CO for CTAX as that would need a CCJ FIRST  9/10 council dont go for CCJ's on CTAX debt , as they can go direct to bailiffs  but they are powerless as there is no right of force entry. dx    
    • That's what the claim, defence /counterclaim and trial is all about
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Xercise4less - Spratt Endicott now instructed


R0b
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Thought I could do with some advice, which I have an idea anyway but would like to make sure from the people with more knowledge on this.

 

So, couple years back maybe around 2013ish signed up to the new Gym in Liverpool pre-opening, offered the £9.99 12 month contract.

 

 

All is fine fine until around October/November when I wrote a letter informing them I have now moved and wished to cancel giving 1 months' notice.

They then took another payment out which I sent a further letter asking why a payment was taken but no response.

 

cancelled DD after that so no further payments could be taken.

I did have proof of receipts but unfortunately after moving they seem to have been lost in transit.

 

 

Forward on a month received a text saying I missed my payment and contact the gym, which I did

and informed them I have moved, asked for copies to be sent by email and so I did but no reply.

 

 

Then CRS got involved and despite telling them I've moved they failed to ask for my new address

and despite having my email and mobile number decided to send letters to the old address

- their excuse was that they dont make phone calls:!:

They also seemed to have ignored every response I made, even forwarding them copies of the letters.

 

they've quoted me £243.xx for fees which they have so far yet to substantiate.

I presume from reading some of the threads here it relates to admin charges amongst other things?

 

 

I was informed that they did a trace, which failed and then decided to do a further two traces, which also failed?!

(could have done a check on my credit file to find my new address).

 

Now I have a letter from Spratt Endicott requesting payment within the next 7 days.

Not sure how they have managed to rack up charges from £9.99 to £243 though?!

 

I'm quite happy to fight this right through to court but for the sake of my time I am also happy to pay a tenner to get rid of them.

 

Your comments would be helpful

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't need to pay anything.

 

 

you paid after your cancellation letter.

so if anything they owe you?

 

 

the +£200 will prob be for the full next 12mts

as they try this dodge to roll you over into another 12mts contract.

 

 

pers I'd ignore them.

 

 

a DCA or their fake/tame sols

are NOT BAILIFFS

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, the link doesn't seem to be working for me? maybe its my end.

 

Well I do know it was a rolling contract after 12 months so I'm not sure why they would try to do that.

 

Anyway, I shall write up a letter tomorrow on this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob and welcome to CAG

 

Are you saying you still have a copy of the cancellation letter but no proof of postage. If so, that's not really a problem.

 

When did you first cancel by letter ?

 

See this case where Spratt Endicott have been instructed - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?455625-Harlands-and-CRS-problems&p=4821442&viewfull=1#post4821442

 

There will be no court action taken as they have no decent grounds to litigate. You could use a similar letter to send to Spratt Endicott but change it a bit so it doesn't look like you've just cut and pasted it. Let us know what you send but keep it similarly short and simple.

 

Spratts will drop this like a Hot Potato when challenged and it'll go back to Harlands/CRS.

 

 

Keep us posted.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick thanks for getting back to me, first letter sent out was in October (I believe it was before October's payment was due but could be wrong) and then also followed up in November when they took further payment - I think the Liverpool Gym opened around September time.

 

As for a copy of the cancellation letter yes I do somewhere, there is a few email chains in which X4L said they'd sort it out asap but failed to do so.

 

I shall knock something up today/this evening and report back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thoughts on the below?

 

---------------

 

SENT BY POST AND EMAIL TO:

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Your reference:

 

I acknowledge your letter dated 13 November 2015, your comments are noted.

 

Your Client’s claim of an alleged outstanding balance of £243.85 is wholly unwarranted. Despite repeated attempts to obtain a breakdown of the charges I have so far been unsuccessful. Therefore, please provide me with an itemised summary of the alleged debt. In any event, I deny that the balance is owed to your Client and I have followed the correct procedure in cancelling my membership with the gym.

 

Any commencement of proceedings without this information is premature and I reserve the right to bring this letter to the court’s attention in relation to you and your client’s unreasonable conduct.

 

Please confirm by return that this matter is now closed.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

IMHO, you don't need to know how Harlands arrive at their spurious figures. You just need to tell Spratts to get lost because you cancelled properly and owe nothing.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Your reference:

 

I acknowledge your letter dated 13 November 2015.

 

Your Client’s claim of an alleged outstanding balance of £243.85 is wholly unwarranted.

 

I cancelled my gym membership in a proper manner and paid all that is due under the agreement T&C's.

 

I owe Harlands nothing but, if you have factual information to the contrary, please supply it by return.

 

Otherwise I expect to hear no more from you.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Send this by normal post and let us know how/if they reply.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi slick, appreciate your comments but if they did commence proceedings then I would at least have an argument and point of reference.

 

I understand from other threads they seem to drop it once I tell them I am disputing it but I would like to cover my back and in any case I would still like to know what the charges are for. This puts the ball firmly back in their court - I cannot defend something if i don't know how they have been calculated!

 

but i will amend and add in this point

I cancelled my gym membership in a proper manner and paid all that is due under the agreement T&C's.

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

Your call entirely and you must do what you feel is right. :thumb:

 

Unfortunately, they won't take court action as they know they'd fail miserably.

 

Let us know what happens next ..............

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Small update, received an email today from Spratt Endicott confirming the following:

 

1. £104.97 in outstanding gym charges

2. £66.50 CRS debt collection charge

3. £72.00 Tracing charge

 

Of course I won't be looking to pay any of those charges or anything near it! I vaguely recall being told that the gym charges were 3 months worth however my monthly payments were £9.99 p/m so they have that incorrect for starters!

 

EDIT: What's the argument on these debt collection/admin charges being reasonable?

Edited by R0b
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

Can you confirm, did you cancel the DD in Oct/Nov 2014 ?

 

I'd now reply to Spratts saying :-

 

Thank you for your email of 18th November.

 

I paid all that was due, including a month's gym fee for the notice period after giving notice to cancel.

 

The amount you seek consists of gym fees that were never due, and admin fees that are unlawful and unenforceable penalty charges.

 

I will pay you nothing but will lodge formal complaints (including to The SRA) if you make any further demand.

 

By the way, depending on the exact dates, the final DD may have been due because of the 1 month notice that's required. This was referred to in your first post.

 

:-)

Edited by slick132

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, the DD was cancelled in November after realising they took another payment, so notice given in October which was paid and then a further payment in November. Either way I see it, notice was given and for arguments sake they can have the 9.99 for November regardless of whether they were entitled to it.

 

Can you explain a bit further on the unlawful and unenforceable admin charges as a penalty? Obviously they have to be reasonable in order to be deemed fair but wonder if anything like this has gone to court and has been judged on as being unfair, also there was nothing in the original agreement to say they could recover the charges from debt collectors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing like this has gone to court, simply because legal action brought on account of a debt made up purely of charges will never win and they know it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

Please confirm the year you cancelled.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bazooka

 

@slick October 2014 signed up August 2013 prior to opening of the gym so I think my first payment actually came out in August was on a 12 month contract rolling month after that - signed up with friend at the time who can verify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob and thanks for the years.

 

The T&C's will have mentioned about admin fees and recovery by Harlands, CRS and/or third party DCA's. However, that does NOT make the admin fees lawful or payable.

 

The issue about default charges has been around for years. In fact, this was the basis for reclaiming bank current a/c charges until 2007. The Supreme Court case [Abbey National and others] decided that bank fees could not be considered for fairness under UTCCR as they were a core part of the bank's income.

 

But that argument did not affect default charges on credit card, catalogue, bank loan or mortgage a/c's. That's how they are still referred to as unlawful, unenforceable and reclaimable.

 

Send the letter off to Spratts and you won't see them for dust !

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, I have to admit I honestly didn't see any reference to collection of charges/admin charges within the agreement at the time as I did read it head to toe including cancellation fees/charges. I will however take your word for it as it has been some time years since signing up and you are clearly more knowledgeable on me than this :p

 

So your saying admin charges are a secondary mechanism than a core term? but I would then have to raise the charges as being unfair, and not always guaranteed to be found unfair?

 

I'll send off the letter tomorrow and see what happens from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

Bottom line is that Harlands always say their charges are authorised, approved, etc but we say they are not. That's why we tell folk to challenge them, and not pay them.

 

I'm not specifically saying the admin fees are a secondary mechanism to raise income - we simply maintain they are effectively penalties that are both unlawful and unenforceable

 

Harlands make their money taking a percentage of the gym fees that are collected through their DD system. But they try to make a whole lot more by charging their admin fees which are then increased by CRS.

 

Send the letter to get Spratts off your back. Then let us know when Harlands/CRS contact you further and we'll suggest a letter, followed by ignoring their demands.

 

To be honest, I'm surprised they are only demanding £240 odd. With this being over a year old, I'd expect them to be seeking far more with their added admin fees. In any event, I think you've paid all that you owe and we'll support you in asserting this.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update, received email this morning saying they are awaiting further instructions from the client and also a detailed breakdown of the charges. Is this the likely stage that they will not go any further forward or am I to expect further emails before they drop it?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH I wouldn't be bothered in the slightest, let them continue flogging a dead horse, they're up a creek without a paddle and they know it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spratts will do nothing and will simply pass it back to Harlands/CRS.

 

If they continue to harass you, you should make formal complaints to The CMA and to Trading Standards,

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

And BBC Watchdog, as they seem to be coming quite prolific of late, can you tell it's nearly Christmas bonus time yet?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good afternoon,

 

slight update as after a couple of months I received an email out of the blue saying that the client has now revised the charges as saying:

 

3 x £9.99 outstanding

£25 admin fees

£66.50 CRS fees

2 x £26 tracing fees

 

Total = £132.47 (they forgot to add the extra tracing fee)

 

Of course I am going to reject this, what's the chances of them issuing a claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...