Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The mini electric vehicle being made by China's biggest carmaker is now outselling Tesla two to one. View the full article
    • https://www.bindmans.com/news/neale-v-dpp-the-right-to-silence-citizens-duties-and-coronavirus-regulations   Perhaps the OP should have said nothing - and risked arrest!   "Firstly, the case calls into question the logic behind aspects of the criminal justice response to the public health crisis created by the Coronavirus pandemic...   "Secondly, it is clear that some police officers have misunderstood and misstated their powers, and citizens’ obligations, under the Regulations and at common law...   "Thirdly, the case confirms reasonable excuses for being outside are not limited to those explicitly set out in the Regulations. Police officers considering whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that an offence has been committed under the Regulations so that an FPN may be issued, or the reasonable grounds for suspicion that are necessary for an arrest, should give proper consideration to any explanation given by members of the public (and what a court might think of them) rather than only recognising those exceptions explicitly listed in the Regulations and/or government guidance...   Fourthly, the case is an example of a failure of the CPS review into prosecutions brought under Coronavirus Regulations, which has found that alarming numbers of cases were wrongly charged..."   Above quotes from the Bindman's article, not the decision.  Case arose from the first lockdown and was in Wales.  Same now?  Also was about not being at home - not mask wearing.    
    • No the first LBA was delivered by royal mail, but I responded by email, sorry if I didn't make that clear.   I look at redacting the emails tomorrow, got to get some sleep now.   Thanks
    • ok well that changes things alot. you've accepted one before by email  and now they are doing it again ..   might have shot yourself in the foot until now lets get some 1st aid done.   gonna be a pain to redact but i'm gonna need to see all the emails in/out please in ONE MULTIPAGE PDF from/inc  date of their last PAPLOC   redact them properly !! read our upload guide carefully   you may  think this is immaterial, but its not, esp important is their and your exact wording
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

CCJ to old address. Lowell/Brian Carter/Shop Direct


Recommended Posts

Just my thought here, im not disagreeing with anything posted.

 

As we are seeing so many DCA's getting back door ccj's through old addresses, would it not be prudent to notify a change of address to them?

 

It may well help in not having to set aside many ccj's only to have to defend the claim anyway.

 

It would not mean anyone had to acknowledge any alleged debt but if its in writing that the dca has been informed and he then tried to obtain a ccj at an old address, surely thats only to your advantage.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

How much is the CCJ for? Do you own your home?

Threads merged for full history   Dx

Ahh £756? , 5,5 years old. Run the clock out.. ignore !  No one will be reapplying to court for that amount 

Forget electoral registers...you have to have proof that the claimant knew your new address....yes previous address is accepted as good service.....but only if they dont know your new address.If you can prove otherwise......

 

Martin in most cases you wouldn't get chance to notify the DCA as they never follow Pre Action Protocol or even let the defendant know they are issuing...nor the defendant knows its been assigned from the OC

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you guys.

 

I two minds now. The only 'proof' I'd have that they knew the new address is that I'd have letters from them before, during and after they placed the CCJ.

 

I never notified the DCA's of address changes.

 

Is there a limit to when I can challenge the CCJ as I would like to ask the courts for a copy.

I've obtained information about the debt from the courts but would a copy contain in-depth information/times/dates/original debts etc. I got the basics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basing your defence entirely around the address will unlikely get it set aside, showing that the claimant had no right to claim for whatever reason, no paperwork, disputed account balance due to charges etc

 

Mr C doesnt like paperwork, so chances are he never had it

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

My account did incur charges (page 2) but I believe this was from the original account before sold to Lowell's.

What could be my next step?

Contacting Lowell's and asking for paperwork/charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly you need to set aside the ccj with the n244.

 

The amount claimed is disputed due to charges etc

 

Wrong address despite having current address

 

Claimants right to bring claim without paperwork

 

These are all good reasons for the set aside.

 

Once set aside, if granted, you can then work on reclaiming them back from shop direct, the original creditor whilst holding off lowells with CCA request.

 

You already have the SAR and statements so prepare the CISheet if you havent done so already.

 

I'm not 100% sure if you can begin the reclaiming while you are having the ccj set aside but im sure one of the team will advise

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin, fantastic. I have a day of Tuesday so will spend all day on this.

 

One thing I need to clarify is "Claimants right to bring claim without paperwork"

I know you said they're useless with the paperwork but what exactly would I be targeting?

 

Would this be filing for a CCJ without original docs?

 

I remember earlier in the thread someone mentioned that they're notorious for loop holes.

If so, I'll find it on the forum somewhere.

 

Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at it like this, if you owed me money but i didnt have it in black and white, in written form with your signature agreeing you owed me and i went to court empty handed with no proof that you owed me anything, how raucous would the judges laughing be?

 

If they are claiming through court, they have to prove you owe them the money, thats why lowells/carter use old addresses so you never receive the claimform and cant defend so judgement is entered in your abscence. They also do this "old address" trick if they havent got a prayer of proving you owe them anything, ie no CCA,Then you are in the position you are in now.

 

Hope thats clear for you

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, a small update, unsure of the relevance but I just spoke with the courts in preparation of my set aside. "PURSUANT TO THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925"

 

They gave a little more information than last time. The address on my SAR notes from Shopdirect which states the acc number, dates and dates debt was sold to Lowell's is an different/older address to the one Lowell's issued the CCJ to. I would not have updated them on this, they would have found out due to the electoral register, and for some reason, only just filed the CCJ in 2015.

 

The debt was sold to lowell's 12/2010.

 

Any use? If not, ignore and I'll continuing building the case as above.

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its more about the right to bring a claim, charges etc than the address, thats secondary and adds to the main defence

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 years later...

Hi CAG

 

I've a 5.5 year old CCJ which I only found out checking my report as it was sent to an old address. It was sent a month after I moved (2015).

Lowell have recently written to me reminding me of the CCJ to my new address.

 

My question is: If it was to go past 6 years and Lowell tried to re-apply,

1. Would I be notified by the courts at my new address or

2. Is it simple a extension of the old CCJ with no chance to defend

3. They send the CCJ to the old address again?

 

After so many years the last thing I want to do is be in contact with a DCA.

I know I don't get to choose but had this been the bank, I'd feel much better contact/setting up a repayment (which ironically is what I should have done before all of this!)

 

Thank you.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 How much is the CCJ for? Do you own your home?

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged for full history

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh £756? , 5,5 years old. Run the clock out.. ignore !  No one will be reapplying to court for that amount 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan up this recent letter to PDF please

read upload carefully.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, London1971 said:

 How much is the CCJ for? Do you own your home?

 

19 hours ago, London1971 said:

Ahh £756? , 5,5 years old. Run the clock out.. ignore !  No one will be reapplying to court for that amount 

 

Indeed.

My thinking was maybe offer them a lower price just to get them out of my hair.

I made a thread last year about the same CCJ for another reason but as it gets closer to 6 years I've been thinking about the 'what if'.

 

I've been trying to find people who've had a CCJ reapplied, not many I must say and I don't know the reason behind it (I hear the courts can favour claimants if the debtor was out of the country etc.

 

How much does it cost them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no such thing as a CCJ reapplied....

 

can we see this letter please in PDF 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm reading that a claimant can apply for a CCJ renewal after 6 years by reapply to the courts (with good reason as to why it wasn't resolved within the 6 years). Quick google search, this wasn't the link where I read it from but pretty much said the same thing.

 

Image below,

 

Thanks.

Chocolaterecipes-.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCJ is coming up to 6yrs without enforcement.

should they let it run past 6yrs...

they will have a very hard time asking the court to enforce it outside of 6yrs from when carter gained the default backdoor judgement

the very fact it was attained by carter by the backdoor is probably why they have never tried, they know should they ever try to enforce it and you push things back to court, the whole sorry story will come out.

carter got 10'000 of backdoor CCJ against people that were 99% faulty.

 

they cannot 'renew' 'reapply' or reset anything.

once the CCJ reaches it's 6th birthday it is removed from your credit file never to return.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:pound:no dca are in it for anything bar free money from mugs to their own pockets to go down the pub that night, pay for staff holidays en masse or their xmas parties...

 

read below in red

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's cleared that up then!

Is there a thread/article you know of where it goes into the type of people who actually work for these agencies or maybe someone's friend etc. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...