Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dear simple simon. with ref claim xxxxxx on xxxx date you sent me proof of the signs at the time of you issuing the parking charge notices listed in your particulars of claim of the above court claim    these signs are not in the name of the claimant stated on the claimform ref above....   should you wish to continue with the said claim , i give notice this file will form part of my evidence should you wish to proceed and waste court time.   just musing
    • Applications for Summary Judgment are not awarded on who did or didn't do what......they cant get a default judgment on either as you have submitted a defence...they could get Summary Judgment.   Summary judgment is only awarded in the follow circumstances...   ·        A claim or issue or a defence to a claim or issue has no real prospect of success and ·        There is no other compelling reason for a trial. (CPR 24.2)   Summary judgment a Quick guide.docx
    • What I’ve read elsewhere (and from being in touch with someone who has won using the above argument - but who also notes that others have lost using the same argument- it seems to be dependent upon the court/judge) is that it is possible to win BUT I’m not entirely certain if it holds actual legal weight.    @dx100uk write a letter you say? To DBL or VCS?   something like this??;   I am writing in respect to the above noted County Court Claim issued by your legal team in connection to three separate Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) issued to vehicle registration mark XXXXXX. I was the named keeper of the vehicle at the time of the PCN issue but do not claim liability.   I wish you to note the following; whilst you may ‘think’ that you have adequate grounds to make this claim, the simple facts are that you have absolutely no right (in law??) and the evidence I have uncovered as a direct result of your claim, along with the evidence and wording contained in the communications you sent to me (dated XX August 2017) irrefutably show that you (Vehicle Control Services) have absolutely no claim in law.   Please be aware that should continue to pursue this claim not only will you incur your own costs but also costs that I will be claiming against you for bringing this unfounded and malicious claim which bears no legal weight whatsoever and is in breach of the IPC Code of Conduct (Versions 5 and 6).  Subsequently, I will be reporting you to the ICO for improper use of KADOE and to the IPC for breach of the Code of Conduct.   Yours faithfully,     Scans coming later.... 
    • Always looking for plan b -    the defence is short and poor and not laid out in the correct format - because I didn’t do it    but the points are the same just brief ,    would they have tried for summary judgement if I laid out a bigger defence - yes , they already put on allocation they would apply for one ☝️ n both claims -    they didn’t on claim one as I had a long defence , they did on claim 2 as defence small So did what they said they would do  -    they effectively want my defence struck out , to get a judgement by default , as there chances of winning in court are slim    maybe I include photocopy of that form and say they always were going to apply for this, they did not get to this point by my poor defence , I don’t have to bear their costs 
    • By appeal you mean set a side...the application fee would be £255 with a hearing (unless your exempt from fees )so you need to ask yourself ....would it be worthwhile..or better use the fee to pay off the judgment before its registered ?    The court wont accept your mistake and show any leniency.   Lesson learned for the future...19 days to AOS and a further 14 days to submit a defence = 33 days in total.    Sorry    Andy
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Tripped and fell in supermarket car park


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1904 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

 

I tripped and fell in Sainsbury's under cover car park.

 

 

There was a pool of water on the floor and I fell flat on my face breaking my front tooth and nose.

No one from Sainsbury's came to my aid,

two passers by helped me to my car and I phoned my daughter who drove me to A and E.

 

I went to Sainsbury's the following day and spoke to the deputy manager, he filled in an accident form.

 

 

Went to the car park with me and took photos, examined my shoes

and told me he would look at the CCTV footage and call me up last week.

So far nothing!

I also showed him the A and E report.

 

My dental bill so far is £350 with another £600 to replace my partial denture.

 

 

Can anyone help me draft a letter as I wish to claim compensation?

Do you think I have a case?

 

I don't know what the CCTV will reveal because I was on the floor covered in blood for a while

and they never sent anyone to help me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

TBH I don't rate your chances high at all.

 

If it had happened in store then a different kettle of fish all together, the store, even though on private land, can't be responsible for customers falling over, UNLESS, there is of course an obvious fault/crater/pot hole in the car parks surface where you fell?

 

I think you will be at the mercy of the store manager here, at best they may give you some shopping vouchers, at worst, nothing.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the car park area will be contracted out, like most, to a PPC.

 

Was the ground damaged at all?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I beg to differ, the owners of the land (Sainsbury's) will be responsible for the actions of their contractors as their direct agents

 

I would think Vicarious Liability which is strict covers this as the tort took place during a period of employment, that is Sainsbury's and the car park contracted operator

 

It has not even been confirmed yet if Sainsbury's car park is managed by a third party operator. If the car park is free i very much doubt that

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

The walkway was very wet but I didn't see any damage. Obviously after the fall I was so injured I didn't take photos. Which was odd for an undercover car park, the wetness I mean

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damage as such is not the issue

 

The issue being was the water in the covered car park excessive??

 

CCTV will cover that

 

You need to be requesting a copy immediately before it is wiped of the accident

 

I would be phoning Sainsbury's head office today and back up the request by email as a paper trail

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have limited details but there is certainly enough to say you will probably have a claim for personal injury from the supermarket.

 

Google a personal injury lawyer that offers a "no win no fee" deal and let them run the claim for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
We have limited details but there is certainly enough to say you will probably have a claim for personal injury from the supermarket.

 

Google a personal injury lawyer that offers a "no win no fee" deal and let them run the claim for you.

 

So if I walk in a car park, trip over my own feet and break my teeth, I can sue the landowner?

 

The op has already said no damage or obstacle, and that it was just a puddle.

 

 

Accidents happen and if the car park does not have a fault,

and the op did just trip over their own feet,

then how can they claim?

On what grounds?

Because the supermarket failed to keep the car park dry?

Because the car park was not perfectly level?

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
So if I walk in a car park, trip over my own feet and break my teeth, I can sue the landowner?

The op has already said no damage or obstacle, and that it was just a puddle. Accidents happen and if the car park does not have a fault, and the op did just trip over their own feet, then how can they claim? On what grounds? Because the supermarket failed to keep the car park dry? Because the car park was not perfectly level?

 

Did the OP not say she slipped in a puddle?

 

Where are you getting that the OP tripped over their own feet? Unless I missed something of course.

 

no wonder fraudulent claims push up fees - get a life

 

What is fraudulent about what the OP has said?

 

Try being less ignorant next time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
At the moment, I am trying to understand how one can trip over a puddle, but I may have missed something..

 

How about oil or diesel mixed in with the rain water??

 

After all it is a supermarket car park

 

Being an ex-motorcyclist a deadly combination for grip

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thank you for your concern. Talk about jumping to conclusions, which is not helpful.

 

 

I didn't trip over my own feet,

the path where you are supposed to walk is a different surface to where you park your car.

 

 

The floor was wet and slippy, with a pool of water on it.

No warning signs.

 

 

The manager checked my footwear when I returned to the store to fill out the accident form

and ensured there was no trip hazard or loss of traction.

 

I certainly do not make a habit of making fictitious claims but I feel the supermarket was negligent

and as I have over a thousand pounds out of pocket expenses,

I will make a claim, if I feel fit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The walkway was very wet but I didn't see any damage. Obviously after the fall I was so injured I didn't take photos. Which was odd for an undercover car park, the wetness I mean

 

Ok, This is the question. What caused you to trip ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find your remarks quite offensive

I have never attempted to make a fraudulent claim in my life.

 

 

I ignored your first comment about the rain as I thought your attempt at humour was misplaced,

even with the poor spelling.

 

 

I think you need to think about what you are saying before you jump to conclusions.

This is no joke,

 

 

I have been asked to decide if I will have surgery.

This is after two major surgeries this year.

 

I think if you are just here to vent your spleen and not offer constructive advice

you are part of a problem not a solution -therefore you appear to be the one who needs to get a life

 

It was the wet ground, it made the surface slippy and slick and I tried to save myself from falling. My shoes had traction on the soles but I still tripped.

 

 

I don't welcome offensive comments about fraudulent claims. This is the first time I will have made any claim about anything.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
no wonder fraudulent claims push up fees - get a life

 

What is fraudulent about what the OP has said?

 

Try being less ignorant next time.

 

Both of these remarks are extremely unhelpful

 

Ok, This is the question. What caused you to trip ?

 

And of course this is the obvious question which no one else bothered to ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thank the genuine people who are trying to help me and giving their advice.

 

 

I don't want to claim for pain and suffering or loss of earnings

 

 

but I just want to know what are my chances of recouping what I would have to pay the dentist,

 

 

as well as what I have already paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...