Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MotoNovo finance trouble


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

My friend bought car on finance,

total payable including fees and interesta was 19.356.72

Last payment he made got him down to 12.935.39

 

MotoNovo started repossession.

The taken the car and now want him to pay another 6.920.22

 

I'm looking at his statement and don't get what all this means,

 

can someone explain please:

Write off rebate: Credit 2.259.03

Write-off option fee: Credit 125

Write off: Credit 5436.76

 

at this point debt is 5.683.93

 

than we have:

Transfer to recoveries:

Debit 6.920.22 which make debt back to 12.604.15

 

then:

Payment: Credit 11.215.86

and at the same time Debit 5607.93

 

Payment: credit 152 and Debit 76

at the end balance is

6920.22

 

Can someone explain whats going on with this?

 

Also one more question,

he bought van recently (second hand, worth about 1500-2000)

he is using it for work,

can they repossess this van even he is using it for work purposes?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't take anything not related to the finance

 

They are not baillifs

 

Why oh why did he voluntary surrender the car!

Never ever do that

Always voluntary terminate an HP agreements

 

Can you scan up the agreement please

Follow upload

 

I bet he got charged a reported fee too???

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't take anything not related to the finance

 

They are not baillifs

 

Why oh why did he voluntary surrender the car!

Never ever do that

Always voluntary terminate an HP agreements

 

Can you scan up the agreement please

Follow upload

 

I bet he got charged a reported fee too???

 

Dx

well he did't know about that he could terminate the agreement,

I did found about it this morning as well when I started looking what he can do now.

 

I don't have his agreement, not even sure if he still have it.

 

 

I will scan and upload his statement this may tell you something.

 

what is it 'reported fee'?

thanks for help

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them an sar

 

 

no good trying to speculate

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah that's good

If you go reclaim every fee listed

And the warranty

And the gap

 

He owes nowt!!!!

 

Sorry he has been had blind there

 

And a £510 repo fee...what totally unlawful the lot!!

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

could you help me with that as I don't really know which way to go now :(

as you can see case started in 2011 he was ignoring it for long time, now is the time to start getting everything sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

every fee in the CISHEET

each on its own line

treat as a penalty charges reclaim

put their int rate in box d15

 

 

treat the gap and warranty as one

then treat as PPI

read link 1 below

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doubt it

that simply what they claim was outstanding at that point.

 

 

prob transfers to recoveries section within the same company. MN

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found on the net that if he paid third of the debt and they repossessed without the court order he will not be liable for the rest of it at all, is that right?

seems like he paid over £8000 out of £19.356 so that well over the third of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not right

just means they cant repo without a return of goods court order

or his permission, hence he got done over by them doing a VS

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not if he agreed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to ask him how did that happen as I'm not sure.

 

don't you think that this 6920.22 is charge for parking of the car while they were trying to sell it?

 

when you add up all payments and write-offs it comes to 20128.52 that he paid and the debt was for 19356.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to ask him how did that happen as I'm not sure.

 

don't you think that this 6920.22 is charge for parking of the car while they were trying to sell it?

 

when you add up all payments and write-offs it comes to 20128.52 that he paid and the debt was for 19356.72

???? If you are going to help him

 

You need to get your brain engaged...

 

Why the heck is that anything to do with that¿????

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

???? If you are going to help him

 

You need to get your brain engaged...

 

Why the heck is that anything to do with that¿????

well I'm thinking about anything they could do. can't see explaination for this amount, it has been debited from nowhere.

will see him today so he maybe able to tell me more about it, maybe more paperwork related to the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the £6k is the bal transferred to their recoveries dept to chase it

 

 

nothing to do, nor does, storage come into it

they cant do that.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dx

I did speak with him and he said that they repossessed the car during the night, he has the keys but there were his tools in the car and they said they will give him tools back for the keys. he still have log book

Link to post
Share on other sites

where was the car repo'd from

road or private drive

 

 

and who were the repo agents?

 

 

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

shame it was from the road

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What we need to establish is the exact date

of the repo,and the exact balance outstanding at that time

 

Also all the detail surrounding the repo

So a full SAR is a must

And a CCA request under s79

 

If you have a copy of the agreement please post it up

Minus personal details

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What we need to establish is the exact date

of the repo,and the exact balance outstanding at that time

 

Also all the detail surrounding the repo

So a full SAR is a must

And a CCA request under s79

 

If you have a copy of the agreement please post it up

Minus personal details

He does't have agreement.

 

 

He is looking for all the paperwork.

 

 

SAR is probably the only way to get it from them.

 

 

I will get him to do it and than report back.

He said to me that he was told if he give them the car keys they would't ask for more money from him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA as well

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...