Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I put in my DQ and as I am in Scotland the most LOCAL of courts they can provide is in Newcastle. I'm not fussed, as I don't mind going on a little vacation to Newcastle. Haven't been yet.   I have a suspicious feeling that I may not have an excuse to go on vacay in Newcastle  ☹️...   I will follow the dialogue of previous mediations that have been narrated on here. 🙂
    • Article 60 has been acted so I can't quite see what there is to post about it.  Perhaps a better heading is needed.
    • Ok by me.  I have never ever mentioned the holocaust, it's just someone trying to get one up.
    • So the appeal has sent their response, typed below 'verbatum'   "Dear Sir/madam,   Thank you for your correspondence relating to your Parking Charge.   The representations stated in your correspondence have been noted and considered.  Please forward to us the full name and address of the driver at the time this charge was incurred so that we can update our records accordingly. We are placing this Charge on hold for 14 days from the date of this email to allow you to provide the details requested.   Yours faithfully"   When we appealed the following was our response:   "The driver drove around looking for a space for 24 minutes but was unable to secure one so left without parking. There has been no breach as there was no opportunity to read the signage and consider it and agree to be bound by its terms and also as the demand is for a parking charge, this is not applicable as there was no parking event to incur such a charge"   It appears that we didnt disclose the driver details so how do you suggest we respond to this please?
    • Soooo as most would predict. PARCEL2GO had extended their time with the small claim online to review what is blatantly their fault.   I hadn't replied on here as I thought it wasn't necessary.    So the wait is over and they have given me their template defence like everybody else on here.     Their DEFENSE extracted from a PDF file.   PDF States:   Why they dispute the claim   2.1. Claimant booked and paid for a service via the Defendant website. During the booking process the Claimant is required to enter the content and value, they confirmed the following: "PC PARTS" (43x30x10, 1kg - £1,200.00). Upon entering this value, the Claimant received the following pop-up message:   2.2. "Don't get caught without enough protection should the unexpected happen. You can protect your parcel up to the value of £2,500.00   2.3. Yes, I would like to protect my £1,200.00 parcel against loss or damage for £60.00 exc VAT.   2.4. No, I'm willing to risk my £1,200.00 parcel. I'm not worried about potential loss or damage."   2.5. Claimant declined the option to protect their goods fully and continued through their booking process. Prior to paying for the service, the Claimant is provided with another chance to protect their goods fully, this was declined again. The Claimant went on to accept the Terms and Conditions.   2.6. The parcel was collected and scanned as being delivered on a later date. Claimant began a claim for loss and requested a full refund. This parcel was confirmed as missing and the claim was reviewed, however, due to zero protection being purchased the claim was rejected and a refund of the carriage fees was added.   2.7. Defendant wishes to rely on sections 6.4-6.7 of the Terms and Conditions: Terms and Conditions | Parcel2Go.com WWW.PARCEL2GO.COM About Parcel2Go.com - Terms and Conditions   Defendant’s timeline of what happened   26 February 2021 Claimant booked and paid for a service via the Defendant website. The Claimant opted for the zero protection service and accepted the Terms and Conditions.   6 March 2021 Parcel scanned as delivered. Claim was created due to a live help contact from the Claimant. An investigation was raised with the courier. During the live help the Claimant confirmed the following: "I did not opt for protection as I didn't have enough money to do so."   13 March 2021 The Claimant contacted again to chase the query and confirmed that the police and other agencies will be involved.   20 March 2021 Claimant contacted live help to chase the investigation. The operator explained delays were being experienced and to allow a little longer for an update. Once received the Claimant would be notified via the claim.   23 March 2021 The courier confirmed the goods as missing and a claim for loss was required. This claim was reviewed and was rejected due to zero protection being purchased. Claimant contact live help to express their disappointment in the service and their goods potentially being stolen. Claimant mentioned this would be taken to court if not resolved.   8 June 2021 Claimant sent an email 'Letter Before Court Claim' the Claimant requested a refund in full for £685.61 within 14 days.   9 June 2021 Defendant responded to the Claimant, providing the Terms and conditions and explained that zero protection was purchased.   1 July 2021 A Letter Before Action was received in paper form, the Defendant responded to this and provided them with a full breakdown of the booking process, along with the Terms. No further response was made.   2 July 2021 Court case was received.   Defendant’s evidence   Contracts and agreements:   Full booking process including the full Terms and Conditions.   Letters, emails and other correspondence:   All correspondence between Claimant and Defendant   3. Mediation   Willing to try mediation Yes   4. Statement of truth   I believe the facts stated in this response are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Company:   Name: Chelsea Walton   Role: Asset Protection Officer   2 August 2021  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

help please with Acendon (as they are known at the moment.)


bob 3456
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1958 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

bob, is your complaint to the FOS still live ? If so, you can add to it. If not, then I would submit a further complaint and reference the previous one.

 

Although if this is subject to current court action, I am not sure if you can make a complaint to the FOS as they will not get involved whilst legal action is ongoing (I think)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

bob, is your complaint to the FOS still live ? If so, you can add to it. If not, then I would submit a further complaint and reference the previous one.

 

Although if this is subject to current court action, I am not sure if you can make a complaint to the FOS as they will not get involved whilst legal action is ongoing (I think)

 

Hi Citizen B,

Ive complained to them (FOS) and have a reference number ,but unsure if they are even taking the case on. ive sent them around 100 pages of stuff so far .

 

Acenden are still doing stuff like adding (not deducting) our full monthly payment on to the arrears balance and the interest we should pay out of it adding that onto the capital balance probably in the hope that we havent noticed before the next statement is due .

 

This is illegal as far as i`m aware.

The court case was adjourned by them almost on the same day it was issued and they were granted liberty to restore. This left us with almost £600 of legal fees added to our account.

I just dont know what to do about this disgraceful company.

 

Thanks

 

Heres some snippets from Acendens latest letter.

First one is what they said in a letter received on the same day as court papers in Dec2015.

Second is their latest change of mind on the £120.00 and that legal action is based on outstanding contractual mnthly payments and fees combined???

 

Third, is we asked why no documents in SAR from the whole of 2008.

 

Lastly their claim the court was fully aware of the arrears balance ,they stated on court papers it was £1300 , but at the time it was £600 and consisted entirely of fees.

 

snippet 2

 

snippet 3

 

snippet 4

what 4.jpg

what.jpg

what2.jpg

what3.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have asked someone with more experience to look in on this thread. Please be patient as I know they are busy.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn thanks.

What they are now doing is downright unlawful, they are intent on the raising arrears balance back up in any devious way they can(after removing over £2000 in fees shortly before the court action in Dec 2015) and the capital balance is the same as it was when we took out the loan in 2006.

There is no way this can be paid off in the 5 years 8 months remaining on the loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from a letter that I have just sent Acenden and its lawyer. Feel free to adopt, if it is helpful.

 

1 Theft Act 1968 Section 24 A of the Theft Act 1968 creates an offence of dishonestly retaining a wrongful credit. That includes doing this by with any program or data held in electronic form (Section 8 (1) (b) of the Fraud Act 2006).

 

2 Case law precedent The Peters v Anderson (1814) judgement was that

 

"A person who is indebted to another on two several accounts, may, on paying him money, ascribe it to which account he pleases.–and his election may either be expressed,-Or may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction. "

9 If Acenden Limited persist in conduct that may constitute offences under the legislation cited, above, the Theft Act 1968 in particular, there may arise no alternative for me but to seek damages in the courts (Financial Services Act 2012 Section 138 D).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court case was adjourned by them almost on the same day it was issued and they were granted liberty to restore. This left us with almost £600 of legal fees added to our account.

 

Just to note again: the Order granting liberty to restore is void because summary judgements in cases involving mortgageors are expressly prohibited by Civil Procedure Rule CPR 24.3 (2) (a) (i). So you are not liable for any of the costs incurred in obtaining that Order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under assumption that according to the FCA monthly payments must be applied to any payment shortfall before addressing any arrears fees or charges???

 

You are correct. And compliance with FCA Rules and Principles is not optional.

 

MCOB 12.4.1BR26/04/2014

 

When a customer has a payment shortfall in respect of a regulated mortgage contract, a firm must ensure that any payments received from the customer are allocated first towards paying off the balance of the payment shortfall (excluding any interest or charges on that balance).

 

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/MCOB/12/4.html

 

In a complaint about this Acenden said they could return this to our capital account

to be applied correctly , they are now saying that they cannot do this!

 

I think this is grounds for sending Acenden a FORMAL NOTICE - ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE. As a letter, listing the information and answers you have asked for and are reasonably entitled to have and which they have failed to give you. Tell them, citing section 10 of the Data Protection Act,

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/section/10

 

to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient merely to assert that you have a ‘legal right’; you must give me your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends. If you do not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data. Furthermore, as you will be aware, a creditor is not permitted to take ANY Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

See also,

 

A lender may not be able to force you to pay back money you borrowed if:

 

it shows the wrong amount of credit

it shows the wrong repayments or they're missed out altogether

it doesn’t contain all the legal notices it should, for example a cancellation notice

the lender is not FCA authorised to lend money."

 

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/help-with-debt/how-to-dispute-a-credit-debt/how-to-dispute-a-debt/

 

Agreement is unenforceable until Acenden corrects the errors which, I understand, include setting the wrong figure for repayments from the outset. And Eurosail is not authorised to lend money so it cannot bring legal proceedings against you to exercise any right in a credit agreement.

 

While the agreement is unenforceable, they have no right to register any defaults on your credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have asked someone with more experience to look in on this thread. Please be patient as I know they are busy.

Hi Ell-enn anything yet??

 

Could anyone else please state whether or not

if a loan has supposedly changed ownership ,

are the new owners liable for the whole agreement up to the present date .

ie in regards to any actions on the account from the start ,fees /charges , legal fees/action ???

 

 

Or can they claim that anything that happened before they took over has nothing to do with them??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they are responsible too

they inherit all rights.

 

 

but anyway we know its the same lot!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

today we received a letter from Eurosail

saying that our second charge secured loan will from 21st March 2016 change

from being regulated by the CCA1974

and the FCA Conc rules to the FCA MCOB rules .

 

Is this a good or bad thing ??

 

It does say that they now have to apply any payments we make to any missed Contractual monthly payments NOT to anyway else.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone help ,some one must be able to advise on the benefits of not of being under MCOB rules???

 

Sounds like good news to me and would think you'll get much better protection as a consumer due to the mortgage now being regulated. Companies like this have to clean up their acts!! :)

 

See link below

 

https://www.fca.org.uk/static/fca/documents/factsheets/fs0040.pdf

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...