Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CITI Finance PPI reclaim . I have a refund but need advice !!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

My ex hubby and I took out a loan in 2003 with Citi financial,

 

 

it was never paid off due to running into difficulties.

 

 

It is now been paid through the courts.

 

After reading the paperwork from Reston solicitors we noticed we had paid ppi on the loan of £2373.53.

 

 

I want to claim it back if possible but

 

 

I have to much going on in my life to do it myself so want someone to recommend a company who don't charge the earth to claim it back for me.

Thanks in advance, Debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Definitely not Gladstone Brookes - before they have even begun to try to get any money back, they will discuss the sordid subject of fees. And if you happen to be unable to meet those fees upfront, they have the unmitigated gall to ask you to complete an income and expenditure form. I dropped them at that point, and left them in a state of "Oi mate! OI MATE!"

 

I am sure many of the folk on here will advise us to save money and do it ourselves, but let us see....

Link to post
Share on other sites

NONE OF THEM.

 

if you cant do it now leave it

 

you could lose upto 50% of that balance through FEES, VAT & tax clawback

and you'll never know the actual amount you can reclaim with the Credit cards interest at compounded rates

 

leave till you can sort it yourself

there is NO time limit on PPI.

 

have you all the credit card statements?

 

if you have

then p'haps after you scan them up

 

some nice sole might do your spreaadsheet

the rest is EASY!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for the speedy reply, and I'll leave Gladstones a miss.

 

Dx as usual you have come to my aid.

 

I don't have any statements as we didn't know there was ppi on the loan,

 

I have a copy of the agreement sent by Restons, that's how we found out we had it added to the loan.

 

I wouldn't know we're to start claiming it back,

 

I should be a dab hand at this by now all the forms I am dealing with at the minute lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well sending the OC an SAR to get all the statements will take 40 days anyway

 

 

so by that time things might be easier.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR the original creditor to get a transaction list (Whisch will show interest rate) and any other info they hold on you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will send the template letter off by recorded delivery.

 

 

Does the £10 have to be cheque or postal order??

 

The account is now in the hands of Restons/Arrow global

 

 

so do I still send to CITI finance head office??

 

Getting on this today ��

Link to post
Share on other sites

po or cheque to the OC

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what grounds do you think you are entitled to it back? You can't get it back just because you have it and neither can any third party.

 

If you have reasons you may as well spend five minutes typing out a letter to explain them and sticking a stamp on it.

 

Be aware that if you do get offered anything, you probably won't see it as they will be likely to offset against the arrears on your loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your post Hortz, but I have as much right to claim the ppi back as anybody else. If we do get some back and it goes to pay of the debt then so be it, at least the debt won't be so big.

 

You've missed the point. Neither you nor anybody else has any right to just "claim the PPI back" as you put it. Despite what you may read in the media, PPI is not some kind of magical insurance which you can get back just because you feel like it. If you go in expecting to get it back just because you have it then you are likely to end up disappointed. There is also no company out there who can get it back for you just because you have it.

 

All any company can do is send in a complaint alleging missale of a policy on your behalf. That basically means that you were misled or misadvised at the time of purchasing the product and would not have purchased it had you been given the correct advice/information. However, you will still need to give the the reasons for your complaint, I.e why you wouldn't have bought it and what misleading information/advice you were given.

 

The moral of the story being that if you have reason for complaint and can give all the above information, you may as well give it directly to the seller of the PPI. Either you spend 15 minutes writing a letter, or you pay a CMC potentially hundreds of pounds to do so.

 

One thing I neglected to mention last night is that this is especially so for somebody in your situation where your loan is in arrears. This is because if they do offer you anything and offset it then you could end up in a position where you don't see any of the money but still end up with a bill from the CMC. Indeed, a lot of CMCs will now not deal with customers who are in arrears since in the above scenario they can rarely find money to pay them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it quite funny actually.......

 

it IS a magical insurance....

it was MAGICALLY charged to just about 85% of people

it MAGICALLY appeared on everyones account

it is MAGICAL because if you ever tried to claim on it - it never covered you

it ONLY MAGICALLY lined the advisors pockets through commission payments

 

nearly every bank fleeced people

and

nearly every household suffered it.

 

yet WE cant put in a speculative claim asking for it back...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit like the 'valid' reason for levying it in the first place.....dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day Hortz if we get money back then great, if we don't no worries.

Millions of people claim the money back with great success, they must have had a valid reason or they wouldn't have got money back.

If you don't try you don't get.

Anyway after reading the conditions of the ppi, we would never have agreed to it anyway as it states that if either one of us came out of work we couldn't claim on it. We both had to be out of work at the same time before submitting a claim. Why would I pay nearly £2,400.00 for something that's useless??????

I have taken advice of dx100 and many others on here for many years, and I trust and value what they say, and if they think it's worth a shot then I'm going for it. The only thing I might lose is my time and effort if it goes "Pete Tong"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it quite funny actually.......

 

 

it IS a magical insurance....

it was MAGICALLY charged to just about 85% of people

it MAGICALLY appeared on everyones account

it is MAGICAL because if you ever tried to claim on it - it never covered you

it ONLY MAGICALLY lined the advisors pockets through commission payments

 

 

nearly every bank fleeced people

and

nearly every household suffered it.

 

 

yet WE cant put in a speculative claim asking for it back...

 

I think this is all a little broadbrush.

 

It didn't appear on everyone's accounts. When it did, it wasn't a magical appearance. In the vast majority of cases it was selected. It also did provide useful cover to people. It is wrong to say that it "never" covered people. Not everyone who sold PPI was on commission.

 

That isn't to say that a PPI mis-selling problem is non-existent. It happened. But people also have to be prepared to accept that they may not have fallen 'victim' to it - even if they do have PPI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello they'rer both here now.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we have said anything controversial.

 

All we have pointed out is that people do not get PPI premiums refunded just because they fancy it. PPI wasn't some sort of investment that people can now draw from. There has to have been something wrong with the sale of the product.

 

It will not always be the case that something went wrong.

 

 

People ought to be aware of this when they start the complaint process.

 

 

For a start, it will assist them in making their complaint as it will encourage them to have a proper think

as to what they think went wrong when PPI was sold to them.

 

 

It will also serve as a reality check - they go into the process in an informed manner rather than believing the rubbish CMCs come out with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

something went wrong..yea the OC fleeced them out of PPI.

 

there are far too many companies getting away with 'it was a non advised sale'

 

or

 

'the mug blindly signed up to it because they didn't read the information available properly at the time of signing'

 

tough nothing you can do about.

 

it would be pleasing the see the two of you help progress breaking down these walls

rather than, to put it bluntly, appearing to build new walls, that in all effect, aren't related to the posters questions.

 

its called help....not putting or steering people away from other routes of success

 

you both obviously have an extremely useful and extensive knowledge of the PPI business

 

it would be nice if that was used in a positive attitude toward CAG

 

and not one of 'well you'll hit this brickwall - so what we a re really saying is give up.

 

we on the siteteam are seriously questioning 'why' you are on CAG at all?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So: on advised v non advised. I think it can be a valid point since the obligations on the business are different depending on the sales method.

 

On people signing without reading information - that too can be a valid point.

 

I'm on this site to help people. And I believe that to help people you must give honest information.

 

 

What I see a lot of on here is people giving their opinion as to how things should work rather than advising people on how things do work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hiya just wanted a bit of help please.

 

I have recently sent of a letter to CITIFINANCE regarding miss sold PPI on a loan I took out in 2003.

 

I sent it to a PO Box number and within a week got a reply.

They sent me a questionnaire which I filled in and sent back to the same PO Box.

 

I got a letter back 10 days later asking me to fill in the form and please send it back or my complaint will be dismissed.

 

On the letter there was an email address which was to be used if there was any problems.

 

There was no telephone numbers at all.

I have emailed them at least 10 times and had not one reply.

 

I can't find a telephone number to contact them

 

. I find it strange that they received my first letter but have not received completed form which was sent to the same address.

 

Any advice would be great as I feel I'm running out of time

, cheers Debbie.

Edited by divadeb
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

macatac thanks but this is the link I have already used. I rang the number but they can't give me another number or email address. It's like banging your head against a brick wall. I can't even send anything recorded delivery as its a PO Box number grrrrrrr.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...