Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance and revolving credit


pauldb38
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi this is my first post to the group- My name is paul and live in york.

 

Back in 2004 i took out a home inprovement loan via safestyle uk for the sum of 2171 over a priod of 120 months

and i took out payment protectection at a cost £471.

 

Shortly after taking the loan out as i was contracting my contract wasn't renewed,

upon trying to claim againt my payment protection i was informed i wasn't covered as i was classed as self employed

(shame they never told me this when charging me £471)

 

 

i had a dispute with them as i wasn't working and wasn't covered

after months of haggleing i got them to agree to a pro-rata refund which would go onto my account to clear the arears.

I started and work shortly after and started to make full payments

since then never missed a payment and i thought my payments were up to date.

 

 

Then about 3 years ago i started to get your accounts in arrears calls

to cut a long story short the payment protection refund never appared on my account

and once again in dispute but i continued to pay.

 

 

Last september 2014 my loan should have finished but was informed i actually owed more 10 years on than my actual loan amount.

I have exhausted all ppi possibilities

they claim they don't have anything on the pro-rata refund despite me signing a form in their york office.

 

 

the FOS say as its pre 2005 theres nothing i can do,

welcome say it was sold via safstyle so they wouldn't be responsible

even though i thought i was dealing with Welcome in their office.

 

 

currently despite paying for 11 years my £2171 loan stands at £2852.77

 

 

i told the lady at welcome i had just had a stroke and couldn't deal with this at the moment.

she turned round to me and said well as long as you relise if you die the debt gets passed onto your familly.

 

 

This has really upset me i don't know what to do

Surely they cant charge me for 11 years on a 10 year loan and actually owe more money.

 

 

This loan if continues will never be paid off ?

 

 

Please if someone can help

i don't want this debt hanging over me or

if i die want it passed on to loved ones.

 

 

Apparently i have already paid 7000 on this loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Do you have a copy of the original agreement ?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Do you have a copy of the original agreement ?

 

I have a copy

i paid i think £10 for a copy of everything the company has on me,

reason why i got this is i was trying to prove i signed a form in their office allowing them to get a refund on the payment protection,

but sadly it was omitted,

 

 

the only sort of proof i have but again not good enough to satisfy them,

is i said until they sort the refund on the payment protection i wont be making a payment then in december of 2005

 

 

they have a record of me going into the office setting up a new direct debit for the full monthly payment

this was at the time i signed for the pro-rata refund but they omitted that from the report i paid for.

 

 

I was trying to prove the arrears was cleared with the refund so they should be no charges.

 

 

I'm so scared right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a copy i paid i think £10 for a copy of everything the company has on me, reaon why i got this is i was trying to prove i signed a form in there office allowing them to get a refund on the payment protection, but sadly it was omitted, the only sort of proof i have but again not good enough to satisfy them, is i said until they sort the refund on the payment protection i wont be making a payment then in december of 2005 they have a record of me going into the office setting up a new direct debit for the full monthly payment this was at the time i signed for the prorater refund but they omitted that from the report i paid for. I was trying to prove the arrears was cleared with the refund so they should be no charges. I'm so scared right now.

 

post up an edited (personal details etc omitted) copy of your agreement as dx suggested.

 

Sorry was it a secured loan ?

 

was the agreement regulated ?

 

Then I am sure there are enough people on this forum who can assist with this lot.

 

:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loans abover 25000 are not regulated

 

Yours has to be regulated by the CCA 1974

 

That agreement is totally pants and missing even the basic prescribed terms

 

Totally unenforceable in my opinion

 

Reminds me of an old credit card application you got out of those magazines

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the Prescribed Terms for an Unenforceable Credit Agreement?

 

For a credit agreement to be enforceable in a court of law it must contain a number of prescribed terms. If any contract is missing any of these prescribed terms then it can be deemed ‘unenforceable’ and the debt cannot legally be collected by the lender.

 

In section 127(3) of the consumer creditlink3.gif Act 1974 it clearly states;

 

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1) (a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

Here is an overview of the requirements of section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. For a credit agreement to be enforceable it must contain the following prescribed terms;

 

1) Amount of credit

 

There must be a term on the agreement which states the amount of credit which has been issued

 

2) Credit Limit

 

The agreement must include regarding a credit limit or if a credit limit is not required (i.e. in the case of a loan)

 

3) Repayments

 

The agreement must contain information on how the debtor is to make repayments. This could be in the form of any of the following points;

a. Amount of repayments to be made

b. Date the repayments are to be made

c. Timing of payments

d. Frequency of payments

e. Total number of repayments (For instance, when a loan is required)

f. The power of the creditor to vary any of the above mentioned

f. The manner in which any of the above is to be determined.

4) Rate of interest

 

There must be a term referring to the rate of interest to be applied to the credit agreement

Credit Cards;

 

If you have a credit card then sections 2, 3, and 4 apply to you.

 

Loans;

If you have a loan sections 1 and 2 apply.

 

What if my credit agreement does not contain any or one of these points?

You credit agreement does not comply with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and is invalid. If you credit agreement was to be taken to a court the judge would not be able to make an enforcement order to enable to debt to be collected by the lender.

 

When this happens the debt effectively sits in ‘limbo’ as it cannot be legally collected and you are not obliged to repay it. Most lenders don’t want loose ends or debts sat in ‘limbo’ as it takes up more of their resources maintaining dormant accounts so in the majority of cases the lender will write the debt off.

 

Section127(3) also provides that the court may not make an enforcement order unless a document containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor. This basically means a lender needs to be able to supply a ‘true copy’ signed copy of a credit agreement, along with signed terms and conditions in order for it to be enforceable in a court of law. If a lender cannot supply this then the debt can also be rendered unenforceable.

 

 

Pinched from andy

 

Your agreement is prior to April 2007 so 127(3) applies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either i am blind but nowhere on that agreement shows you took out payment protection insurance

 

The most you should have paid back in total is £4500

 

I smell welcome creative accounting again

 

This loan is now finished, at an end and you have a big wedge coming your way me thinks

 

Do you have a recent statement you can post up?

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one but they also sent me a settlement letter which is a joke

why would i pay for a loan for 11 years when it should be ten year

and then expect to pay £2800 some 700 more than the starting balance.

 

 

I can post up the other info tommorow ?

So what do i do next ?

I'd be happy if i could just get them off my back and not hve to pay another penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what you have posted up this agreement is now history

i need to see a statement first before the next step

 

Welcome went bust because of the endemic fraud committed within ther branch offices,

 

Agreements re-written without the knowledge of the account holders, loans being made out to people who never even applied for loans, fictious fees and charges, you name it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruddington is no more

 

Welcome has gone bust

 

The acccounts are being handled by the parent company in Batley, Yorkshire. Cattles

 

Check back tomorrow while i do some more digging

 

How do you know you are still paying PPI??

 

Sorry for the stupid question but i have to ask

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what going on here

 

 

safestyle are GE money [as the agreement says]

nothing to do with welcome finance

which the statement seems to be from.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what going on here

 

 

safestyle are GE money [as the agreement says]

nothing to do with welcome finance

which the statement seems to be from.

 

 

dx

 

Lol dx you beat me to it - I was just about to ask the same thing.

 

Safestyle would be the salesman and GE / First National the Lender ?

 

Statement from Welcome ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...