Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS and wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided?. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance and revolving credit


pauldb38
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi this is my first post to the group- My name is paul and live in york.

 

Back in 2004 i took out a home inprovement loan via safestyle uk for the sum of 2171 over a priod of 120 months

and i took out payment protectection at a cost £471.

 

Shortly after taking the loan out as i was contracting my contract wasn't renewed,

upon trying to claim againt my payment protection i was informed i wasn't covered as i was classed as self employed

(shame they never told me this when charging me £471)

 

 

i had a dispute with them as i wasn't working and wasn't covered

after months of haggleing i got them to agree to a pro-rata refund which would go onto my account to clear the arears.

I started and work shortly after and started to make full payments

since then never missed a payment and i thought my payments were up to date.

 

 

Then about 3 years ago i started to get your accounts in arrears calls

to cut a long story short the payment protection refund never appared on my account

and once again in dispute but i continued to pay.

 

 

Last september 2014 my loan should have finished but was informed i actually owed more 10 years on than my actual loan amount.

I have exhausted all ppi possibilities

they claim they don't have anything on the pro-rata refund despite me signing a form in their york office.

 

 

the FOS say as its pre 2005 theres nothing i can do,

welcome say it was sold via safstyle so they wouldn't be responsible

even though i thought i was dealing with Welcome in their office.

 

 

currently despite paying for 11 years my £2171 loan stands at £2852.77

 

 

i told the lady at welcome i had just had a stroke and couldn't deal with this at the moment.

she turned round to me and said well as long as you relise if you die the debt gets passed onto your familly.

 

 

This has really upset me i don't know what to do

Surely they cant charge me for 11 years on a 10 year loan and actually owe more money.

 

 

This loan if continues will never be paid off ?

 

 

Please if someone can help

i don't want this debt hanging over me or

if i die want it passed on to loved ones.

 

 

Apparently i have already paid 7000 on this loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Do you have a copy of the original agreement ?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Do you have a copy of the original agreement ?

 

I have a copy

i paid i think £10 for a copy of everything the company has on me,

reason why i got this is i was trying to prove i signed a form in their office allowing them to get a refund on the payment protection,

but sadly it was omitted,

 

 

the only sort of proof i have but again not good enough to satisfy them,

is i said until they sort the refund on the payment protection i wont be making a payment then in december of 2005

 

 

they have a record of me going into the office setting up a new direct debit for the full monthly payment

this was at the time i signed for the pro-rata refund but they omitted that from the report i paid for.

 

 

I was trying to prove the arrears was cleared with the refund so they should be no charges.

 

 

I'm so scared right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a copy i paid i think £10 for a copy of everything the company has on me, reaon why i got this is i was trying to prove i signed a form in there office allowing them to get a refund on the payment protection, but sadly it was omitted, the only sort of proof i have but again not good enough to satisfy them, is i said until they sort the refund on the payment protection i wont be making a payment then in december of 2005 they have a record of me going into the office setting up a new direct debit for the full monthly payment this was at the time i signed for the prorater refund but they omitted that from the report i paid for. I was trying to prove the arrears was cleared with the refund so they should be no charges. I'm so scared right now.

 

post up an edited (personal details etc omitted) copy of your agreement as dx suggested.

 

Sorry was it a secured loan ?

 

was the agreement regulated ?

 

Then I am sure there are enough people on this forum who can assist with this lot.

 

:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loans abover 25000 are not regulated

 

Yours has to be regulated by the CCA 1974

 

That agreement is totally pants and missing even the basic prescribed terms

 

Totally unenforceable in my opinion

 

Reminds me of an old credit card application you got out of those magazines

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the Prescribed Terms for an Unenforceable Credit Agreement?

 

For a credit agreement to be enforceable in a court of law it must contain a number of prescribed terms. If any contract is missing any of these prescribed terms then it can be deemed ‘unenforceable’ and the debt cannot legally be collected by the lender.

 

In section 127(3) of the consumer creditlink3.gif Act 1974 it clearly states;

 

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1) (a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

Here is an overview of the requirements of section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. For a credit agreement to be enforceable it must contain the following prescribed terms;

 

1) Amount of credit

 

There must be a term on the agreement which states the amount of credit which has been issued

 

2) Credit Limit

 

The agreement must include regarding a credit limit or if a credit limit is not required (i.e. in the case of a loan)

 

3) Repayments

 

The agreement must contain information on how the debtor is to make repayments. This could be in the form of any of the following points;

a. Amount of repayments to be made

b. Date the repayments are to be made

c. Timing of payments

d. Frequency of payments

e. Total number of repayments (For instance, when a loan is required)

f. The power of the creditor to vary any of the above mentioned

f. The manner in which any of the above is to be determined.

4) Rate of interest

 

There must be a term referring to the rate of interest to be applied to the credit agreement

Credit Cards;

 

If you have a credit card then sections 2, 3, and 4 apply to you.

 

Loans;

If you have a loan sections 1 and 2 apply.

 

What if my credit agreement does not contain any or one of these points?

You credit agreement does not comply with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and is invalid. If you credit agreement was to be taken to a court the judge would not be able to make an enforcement order to enable to debt to be collected by the lender.

 

When this happens the debt effectively sits in ‘limbo’ as it cannot be legally collected and you are not obliged to repay it. Most lenders don’t want loose ends or debts sat in ‘limbo’ as it takes up more of their resources maintaining dormant accounts so in the majority of cases the lender will write the debt off.

 

Section127(3) also provides that the court may not make an enforcement order unless a document containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor. This basically means a lender needs to be able to supply a ‘true copy’ signed copy of a credit agreement, along with signed terms and conditions in order for it to be enforceable in a court of law. If a lender cannot supply this then the debt can also be rendered unenforceable.

 

 

Pinched from andy

 

Your agreement is prior to April 2007 so 127(3) applies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either i am blind but nowhere on that agreement shows you took out payment protection insurance

 

The most you should have paid back in total is £4500

 

I smell welcome creative accounting again

 

This loan is now finished, at an end and you have a big wedge coming your way me thinks

 

Do you have a recent statement you can post up?

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one but they also sent me a settlement letter which is a joke

why would i pay for a loan for 11 years when it should be ten year

and then expect to pay £2800 some 700 more than the starting balance.

 

 

I can post up the other info tommorow ?

So what do i do next ?

I'd be happy if i could just get them off my back and not hve to pay another penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what you have posted up this agreement is now history

i need to see a statement first before the next step

 

Welcome went bust because of the endemic fraud committed within ther branch offices,

 

Agreements re-written without the knowledge of the account holders, loans being made out to people who never even applied for loans, fictious fees and charges, you name it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruddington is no more

 

Welcome has gone bust

 

The acccounts are being handled by the parent company in Batley, Yorkshire. Cattles

 

Check back tomorrow while i do some more digging

 

How do you know you are still paying PPI??

 

Sorry for the stupid question but i have to ask

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what going on here

 

 

safestyle are GE money [as the agreement says]

nothing to do with welcome finance

which the statement seems to be from.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what going on here

 

 

safestyle are GE money [as the agreement says]

nothing to do with welcome finance

which the statement seems to be from.

 

 

dx

 

Lol dx you beat me to it - I was just about to ask the same thing.

 

Safestyle would be the salesman and GE / First National the Lender ?

 

Statement from Welcome ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...