Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Holiday Pay


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in dispute with my employer regarding the amount paid for annual leave, I work a fixed 4 x 12hour shift each week, 48 hours in total. My hand book states that I am entitled to 28 days leave a year. My employer is paying me 9.6 hours per holiday and I believe I should be paid 12 hours per holiday, based on the employments rights act 1996 sections 221 - 224 can anyone advise me on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your employer is correct. If you worked a 5 day week you would be entitled to 28 days x 12 hours.

 

As you work a 4 day week you are entitled to 12 hours x 4/5 = 9.6 hours for 28 days

 

Or alternatively 28 x 4/5 = 22.4 days at 12 hours; it amounts to the same.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand the 22.4 figure but this would be based on the statutory minimum but my hand book does not state only statutory minimum, also my point is that according to he employments rights act 1996 sections 221 - 224 my understanding is that holiday pay must be paid at the same rate of pay as work pay, 221 (2) if the employee’s remuneration for employment in normal working hours (whether by the hour or week or other period) does not vary with the amount of work done in the period, the amount of a week’s pay is the amount which is payable by the employer under the contract of employment in force on the calculation date if the employee works throughout his normal working hours in a week. To me this means my employer must pay me either 48 for a week's holiday as this is a week's pay or 12 hours a day because this would be a day's pay and my employer is only paying me 9.6 hours a day or 38.4 hours per week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of that would be true if you worked a 5 day week.

 

You don't. So you get 4/5ths.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm saying you have to pro rata it for a 4 day week, yes.

 

In effect you get 5.6 weeks holiday, but for you that is 5.6 x a 4 day week = 22.4 days - or 28 days at the lower hourly rate, works out the same.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of that would be true if you worked a 5 day week.

 

You don't. So you get 4/5ths.

 

Should it not be pro-rated on his hours of work ?

 

A part-timer who works 2x 4hr shifts on different days doesn't get 2/5 of the statutory holidays. They get 8/40 of the statutory. Or rather they get 2x 4hr shifts paid when they have a week off. That is not the same as what you are saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should it not be pro-rated on his hours of work ?

 

A part-timer who works 2x 4hr shifts on different days doesn't get 2/5 of the statutory holidays. They get 8/40 of the statutory. Or rather they get 2x 4hr shifts paid when they have a week off. That is not the same as what you are saying.

 

 

Work it out on the actual and see if you get a different answer to what his HR are saying? There are multiple ways of getting to the same end answer!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe my employer cannot pay me 9.6 hrs according to ERA 1996 and this could only be paid at 22.4 days at 12 hours.

 

28 days x 9.6 hours = 268.6 hours

22.4 days x 12 hours = 268.6 hours

 

Entering pedantic territory there, I think.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmzzi, your points assume statutory minimum entitlement

my first post stated 28 days leave a year and my handbook does not state statutory holiday entitlement therefore the specifics on how daily or weekly pay is calculated is different from the points you make.

Link to post
Share on other sites

assume a normal week is 5 days of length x you work 4/5 of x so when you take your annual leave you get 5 weeks of 4 days/week. If you want your employer to look at it your way he will tell you that the day a week you dont work is your holiday and you owe 26 days pay to them!

I work 1 day a week so my paid holiday is 5 days a year which is 5 working weeks pro rata. I obviously take a pay uplift instead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the exact wording of your contract and the 28 days noted in the handbook? no mention of the phrase "pro rata" anywhere at all? Nothing about people not doing a 5 day week?

 

Would you prefer they put you on a 5 day week?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't seem to have made my point clear, if we forget the statutory entitlement and cover the ERA 1996 it clearly states that leave is based on weekly pay and my weekly pay is 48 hours,because my employee handbook makes no mention of statutory minimum leave entitlement but simply states I am entitled to 28 days a year I believe this can only be paid at either 12 hours daily or 48 hours weekly to comply with The Employment Rights Act 1996 section 221- 224

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what is the exact wording in your handbook and contract? Exactly, word for word please?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what is the exact wording in your handbook and contract? Exactly, word for word please?

 

Im not able to give an exact copy just now because I am not home. I can paraphrase from April 2009 you will be entitled to 28 days a year accruing at 2.33 days a month this will be paid based on your fixed weekly hours. There is no mention of a 5 day week or minimum statutory entitlement, I will post word for word tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmzzi, here is a word for word copy of my employee handbook details regarding holidays. Holidays The holiday year runs from 1 January to 31 December.

 

From 1 st April 2009 your annual leave entitlement will increase to 28 days and your entitlement will accrue at 2.33 days per month.

 

 

Holiday pay will be calculated with reference to average pay and average hours worked over the previous 12 weeks. Where your normal hours are fixed, your holiday pay will be based on your normal weekly hours. Where your normal hours are variable, the average number of hours worked (up to 11.2 hours per day or 56 hours per week) will be multiplied by the average rate of pay over that period. For part timers holiday pay will accrue at 2.33 days per month on the basis of the average daily hours worked over the previous 12 week period. You may not carry any unused entitlement forward to a subsequent holiday year. All holiday accrued and not taken by 31st December will be forfeited.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and your average daily hours are 12 x 4/5 = 9.6 for a normal work week

 

your average/normal weekly hours include 3 days off

 

Your average hours worked per week = 9.6 x 5 or 12 x 4

 

Your employer is being totally legit. I wuld drop your dispute, it is not going anywhere.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

jimbo, working out holidays when you don't work 5 days a week does my head in, you have my sympathies. My OH keeps trying to explain his calculations to me.

 

Emmzzi, would things be different on the holiday front if jimbo worked the same number of hours spread over 5 days?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...