Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site  note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.  then log in to the MCOL Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit MCOL. .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... .[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt] . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • The agreement started 11/02/2019  for 47 monthly hire payments   Threat-o-gram : We are instructed on behalf of Hyundai Capital UK Limited T/a Hyundai Finance Contract Hire.  This is inaccurate, as on my hire agreement it says - Owner Santander Consumer (UK) plc trading as Volvo Car Financial Services. Hyundai must be who this other persons agreement is with.   The only will is: Should you fail to make payment of the outstanding bablnce of £5,000, or alternatively provide realistic payment proposals within the next 30 days, we are instructed to issue County Court proceedings against you for the balance outstanding. Such proceedings will also include claim for costs.   Yes I still have my agreement. 
    • Hi M10,   Compared to MANY other cases we see here, a refund of 80% is a decent offer in the circumstances.   Take it and get yourself a new item.   Far better than Very and Apple each denying responsibility and passing the buck, and you being stuck in the middle for months with no help.
    • thanks for all that.... yes interesting. you handed the car back in nov 2020, how long was the lease agreement for and when did it start?   if you read the threat-o-gram carefully it doesn't say WILL anything. who are stated as DWF's client please ? and have you still your copy of this agreement?    
    • A devaluing currency and hard economic conditions make cryptocurrencies attractive despite the risks. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

MEIII ccj 2days short of 6yrs old - now got AEO letter / subst of claimant YB Credit card


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1174 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi and thanks in advance for any time and help .

 

Been meaning to post for a while ,

 

a letter that arrived yesterday (29/9/15) has spurred me on ,

 

My wife a number of years ago had run up a £10k Yorkshire bank visa card debt.

 

When I looked into it earlier this year when she told me about the debt

it seems (according to noddle) she received a CCJ dated on her credit report on the 1/10/09.

 

The letter that arrived yesterday from the county court is titled a "general form of judgment or order" and goes on to say

 

," It is ordered that ME III limited be substituted as the claimant in this claim" , the letter is dated 28/9/15 .

 

Am I right in believing this letters arrival has stopped the debt becoming statute barred by two days ,

 

also as far I am aware there hasnt been any PPI on the debt (not 100% sure) but I am sure there are some hefty charges .

 

And so whats the best way to move forward in this sticky situation

 

.She doesnt really earn that much to even attempt to clear the debt over a number of years so I would have to seriously help .

 

It really affected her nerves hiding it from me for so long and the latest letters arrival may start her off again .

 

Thanks for reading , Andy.

Edited by citizenB
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did your wife submit a defence on the original judgment ?

 

You would need to send a Subject Access Request to the original creditor to establish the level of charges and it would be to them that you would submit a claim for the refund. Well not a refund as such because if they did agree that they were incorrectly placed, then that would come off the debt.

 

 

As far as the Judgment itself, these never become statute barred - just difficult to collect if they have not been pursued for the length of time you have advised, which is just short of 6 years.

 

What appears to have happened is that the debt has been sold on from the original claimant and the company has applied to the court to be replaced in order to pursue.

 

I would have thought though that as the Judgment is so old, not only would they need to replace themselves as claimant, but that they would need to give a reason why they feel they can pursue after such a long time.

 

I will try and find someone who will be able to advise further.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What else does the order say. Bar subst of melll

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys .

 

Letter says

General Form of Judgement or Order in the county court at xxxxxxx

Claim number xxxxxx

Date 28/9/15

 

ME III ltd 1st Claimant

Ref xxxxxxxxx

Wifes Name 1st Defendant

 

Before district judge xxxx sitting at the county court at xxxxxxx then a local address

 

It Is Ordered That

 

1.ME III ltd be substituted as the claimant in this claim.

 

2.This order has been made by the court under CPR 23.9 as the court has disposed of an application without a hearing and without service.

 

Any party may apply to have this order set aside or varied within 7 days of the date of service of this order on that party.

 

Dated 9 september 2015.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The substituted party may well now seek to enforce the CCJ against your wife.

 

The enforcement action could be brought by one of two ways, the Claimant may serve a statutory demand on your wife or he might seek a charging order against your property (if you are home-owners).

 

You should check and double check all your own records of this debt in order to try and establish if there was any PPI on the agreement and if any default notice served was a valid one.

 

Have a proper look into it and post back your findings (if any), in the meantime, if either of the above stated actions are commenced, post back here without delay for advice, guidance, help and support as regards how to deal with the same.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites
They can change the name....just can't enforce it without permission of the court....this has no bearing on the statue of limitations .

 

 

As I thought, they would need to seek the permission of the court.

 

In a few days, check Trust online to see if it is still being reported. After 6 years from the date of the judgment, it shouldn't be.

 

http://www.trustonline.org.uk/

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
As I thought, they would need to seek the permission of the court.

 

In a few days, check Trust online to see if it is still being reported. After 6 years from the date of the judgment, it shouldn't be.

 

Just about to try trust online , I presume I search section 1 England and Wales for ccj's .

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
As I thought, they would need to seek the permission of the court.

 

In a few days, check Trust online to see if it is still being reported. After 6 years from the date of the judgment, it shouldn't be.

 

Just checked trustonline and it shows nothing reported but my wifes noddle credit report still shows the ccj , whats the difference ? thanks Andy .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update time not run yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys and girls ,

Again thanks for your time and knowledge ,

 

my wife has received another letter,

unfortunately she has ripped it up before I could look at it.

 

She says it said after a ccj dated last month they are now about to apply for an attachment of earnings order ,

 

is this scare tactics or can they do that.

 

I have checked her noddle credit report and nothing has changed.

 

Thanks again Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if MEIII are now the claimant yes they can you need to act on this

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will know if they do make application....you will receive a form N56..it is imperative that you either complete it or suspend it within 8 days of receipt...you can be held in contempt of court for failure to comply and even receive a custodial sentence.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

what cornflake packet did that come off?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court sets the repayment on receipt of the n56 which is mandatoiry by the debtor.

The court sets the aoe based on the information on it.

The debtor can seek a suspended aoe.

 

I would not be following the legal advice chief,

as the next thing you know arrest for non compliance with the n56.

Link to post
Share on other sites
What is N56 if you don't mind me asking. I have a CCJ and a charge order but have never heard of or ever seen an N56 form.

 

Its an attachment of earnings order....a means of executing the judgment as the debtor failed to pay the judgment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...

Hi All ,

my wife received a letter today from Mortimer clarke solicitors stating there client obtained a judgement against her on the XX/XX/09 and that they were now instructed to apply to the county court for an attachment of earnings order.

 

The original debt was a Yorkshire bank credit card that was taken out in 1995 ,

we ran into financial problems around 2008/9 and we ignored the debt and stopped paying the debt around the same time,

 

the balance on the letter is showing just over £12k.

 

We have received a few letters over the years but nothing from a Court and with nothing showing on her credit report(noddle) ,

am I right in presuming this is SB'd and not to contact them ?

 

Thanks Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't made a payment since 2009 then it should definitely be statute barred, send them our SB letter (in the library) and it's a good idea to send it recorded delivery so they have to sign for it.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are claiming they have a CCJ then it cant be statute barred..

 

however, they've had 6yrs to enforce the judgement

they have not done so...

its extremely rare for a court to allow enforcement outside of 6yrs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged andyEP

so she never did get an N56 ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk

,never received an N56 ,

and nothing showing on noddle ,

 

and reading back through the thread(which I had forgot about) it seems when I checked trustonline back then nothing was showing ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...