Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Carter Claim Form - JD Williams


hounded
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3096 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, this is the first time I have have posted on here and really could do with some advice.

 

I have received a claim form from the Northampton CCBC on 26th September

and as of yet have not been online to, acknowledge this but I intend to defend in full as I have no recollection of this debt.

 

Name of claimant: Lowell Portfolio I Ltd

Date of issue: 24th September 2015

What is the claim for:

 

The claim is for £180.63, the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and / or services and / or goods.

 

The debt was assigned to / purchased by Lowell Portfolio I Ltd, on 31/03/2014 and notice served pursuant to the law of property act 1925.

 

Particulars

RE- JD Williams

A/C No Pxxxxx98

 

And the claimant claims £180.63

 

The claimant also claims statutory interest pursuant to S.69 of the county courticon act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment of the agreement to date but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of £1000 amounting to £14.45

 

Value of the claim: £195.08 + court fee £25 + solicitor's costs £50 total: £270.08

Original account started: Unknown

Lowell has issued proceedings.

 

Firstly I was unaware of any debt with JD Williams, so have no idea of when this supposedly began.

Secondly I have no knowledge of it having been assigned to Lowell and didn't receive notice of this.

 

I can not remember receiving a default notice, although I have moved 4 times in the last 5 years.

 

I have never received a statutory notice headed “Notice of Default sums” since the date of the default to my knowledge.

 

There was no dispute with the original creditor.

 

 

Having read some threads on here

is the next step to send a CCA Request letter to Lowell

and a CPR request letter to Bryan Carter?

 

 

am unsure of what the wording for the CPR should be though.

 

 

Also I know that I need to go online and acknowledge receipt of the claim form and register my intent to defend.

This is all very new to me as I have never been in this position before.

 

Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

Many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop off and get your credit file

noddle below is free

 

 

as for the CPR 31:14 its in the legal section of the library

that goes to carter

 

 

CCA request

don't sign anything.

 

 

read the full threads for CCA/SAR first.

 

 

on mcol - create a new individual user

then remember that long number

 

 

log in to MCOL

select respond to a claim {AOS BOX]

 

 

then using the details required from the claimform

 

 

defend all

leave juris unticked

 

 

exit mcol

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your quick response dx100uk.

 

I have registered with Noddle and see that this a catalogue I opened an account for in 2010, even though I don't remember doing so.

 

I have sent a CCA request off to Lowell and am in the process of doing the CPR for Carters. Do I need a SAR then? and if I do who would I be sending that to?

 

I have registered with MCOL and completed the AOS section, doing as you advised. When would you start the Defence section against the claim? would that be once you receive any paperwork from either of the above? or should I say if I receive any.

 

Sorry for so many questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as you file your defence by day 33 from the date top right of the claimform [that's day ONE]

you'll be ok

we'll help with that

or simply read a few claims here about low/cater/cat debts.

 

 

lots already, most fail.

 

 

the only thing here is your is post apr 2007 you say?

so a reconstructed agreement might get them through.

 

 

however don't worry about hat for now.

 

 

and don't worry about the sar for now to the cat company either

that wont be through in time [40 days fo sar]

 

 

tell me something...not moved since 2010 have you?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry I haven't responded to your reply until now have just spent over a week in hospital and have come home to a letter from Carters.

 

Thank you for letting me know when to file defence by and believe you me your help would be very much appreciated.

 

Yes this is showing on Noddle as 2010, so far have heard nothing from Lowell re the CCA.

 

Yes i've moved 3 times since 2010, the thing is even though its on my credit record I have no recollection of ever ordering anything from this company let alone opening an account.

 

This is what the letter from Carters says which is addressed to Mr not Ms :-

 

"We write further to your recent letter of 28th September 2015 requesting disclosure pursuant to Part 31.14 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

 

We confirm the claim form was issued by the County Court Business Centre and that Court's Protocol was followed when issuing the claimant's particulars of claim. Practice direction 7C point 1.4 (3A) eliminates the requirement to attach the documents to the particulars of claim when they are issued by this court.

 

We confirm this matter will most properly be allocated to the small claims track as this is a simple contractual matter and Part 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules will therefore not apply.

 

It is the original creditors policy to issue agreements at the start of the contract and statements throughout the duration of the agreement and, in this regard, we ask you to refer to your own records.

 

We confirm our client is not agreeable to an extension for filing your defence.

 

As you will be aware a claim was issued in this matter on or around 24th September 2015 and we are in receipt of your acknowledgement of service. We note your intention to file a defence.

 

We recommend you seek independent legal advice."

 

So basically they are not going to provide any documentation whatever and how can i refer to records i don't have? they are incredibly infuriating which is what i guess they is their job.

 

Thank you in advance for your help with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the standard template letter. They're just saving themselves on work and hoping to frustrate you at the same time. Your defence will ask them to prove the debt exists and I'd expect they'll not hang long about before discontinuing. A £180 debt is probably full of charges and won't be worth their while chasing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are on a low income or benefits try and go for fast track or multitrack for the court processing. It means nothing to you if you lose but they stand to pay a fortune for your (free to you) legal representatives costs. They will look stupid when they havent complied with a CPR then

 

I cant realistically see a debt for £180 being Fast Tracked let alone Multi Tracked Eric....It will be Small Claims Track

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, i could really do with someone's help for the next stage.

 

I have heard nothing further from Carters only the above letter and I have heard absolutely nothing from Lowell's and no copy of the CCA has been forthcoming.

 

I now need to go on and provide my defence but I really could do with some assistance on how I go about wording it, i need to submit my defence by tomorrow so any help would be greatly appreciated!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plenty of examples in the following forum.....try to find one that is similar to your claim.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-Legal-Successes

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

it can be done the same way as you ack'd the claim on mcol website

 

 

post it here first mind

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have typed up and amended to the details of my claim and hope that this is correct for submitting as a defence.

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.THIS CLAIM IS FOR 180.63, THE AMOUNT DUE UNDER AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR AND THE DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE FINANCE AND/OR SERVICES AND OR GOODS

 

2.THE DEBT WAS ASSIGNED TO/PURCHASED BY LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD ON 31/3/2014 AND NOTICE SERVED PURSUANT TO THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925

 

 

PARTICULARS

RE: J D WILLIAMS

A/C NO PXXXXXXX

 

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 180.63

 

 

THE CLAIMANT ALSO CLAIMS STATUTORY INTEREST PURSUANT TO S.69 OF THE COUNTY ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF THE AGREEMENT TO DATE BUT LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 1000 AMOUNTING TO 14.45

 

Defence

 

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. It is admitted I have held an agreement in the past with J D Williams but any alleged balance is and remains in dispute.

 

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment.

 

4. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, Furthermore a request was made pursuant to the CCA1974 section 78 and as at this date the claimant has failed to comply and therefore in default of said request, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

7. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Many thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one change to your paragraph 2 .

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb: 28 days for them to respond and proceed otherwise the claim will be auto stayed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have gone on MCOL and have submitted my defence, so that's all done.

 

I'm guessing you mean 28 days for Lowell/Carters to respond or do you mean the court? And as i'm totally clueless lol what does auto stayed mean?☺

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 day for the claimant to respond to the defence...stayed means paused...parked...suspended.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely is a waiting game then.

 

Thank you for explaining that to me, this is the first time anything like this has happened to me.

 

Its funny really up until i sent the CCA request lowells was phoning me 4/5 times a day. Since i sent that haven't heard from them, not a peep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...