Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Returning faulty goods to Brighthouse after 14days


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have a TV from brighthouse (a baird 48")

The quality of sound is very poor, there is quite obviously a fault as as soon as you turn it up (Just a little bit) the back of the unit vibrates.

The sound is like its playing through a tin can.

 

ive phoned them today and they are coming to collect it, they have offered to repair etc but ive said no and i will sign the cancellation waiver form.

 

Now, I took the contract out 20 days ago so im outside the '14 day cooling off' period to receive a refund.

I have quoted the consumer rights act which states that the buyer is entitled to a refund within 6 months.

The manager was not very clued up so has said they would phone me back tomorrow after she had done a bit of 'research'

 

So when they phone i just need to know for sure that if the item is faulty i am entitled to a full refund within 6 months regardless of the '14 day period'

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What part of the Consumer Rights Act do you believe entitles you to a refund within 6 months?

6 months is just the period during which a fault is assumed to have been present since purchase and so the onus is on the seller to prove otherwise. During this time though it's up to the retailer whether they go with repair/refund/replace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[Your address]

 

[Company/ supplier address]

 

Dear

 

 

[Reference: contract number]

 

On [date] I [bought/placed an order for] a [item], received it on [date]. I have discovered that the [item] has the following problem: [add details].

 

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 makes it an implied term of the contract that goods be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality.

 

As you are in breach of contract I am rejecting the [item] and request that you refund the sum paid to you of [price].

 

I also require you to confirm whether you will arrange for the [item] to be collected or will reimburse me for the cost of returning it.

 

If I do not receive your satisfactory proposals for settlement of my claim within seven days of the date of this letter, I intend to issue a claim against you in the county court without further reference to you.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

What part of the Consumer Rights Act do you believe entitles you to a refund within 6 months?

6 months is just the period during which a fault is assumed to have been present since purchase and so the onus is on the seller to prove otherwise. During this time though it's up to the retailer whether they go with repair/refund/replace.

 

Sorry i was referring to the sales of goods act as on the CAB website following the research i have done it does state elsewhere about the 6 month period

 

Thank you obiter for the letter template i will keep a copy of it as my next line of defence.

 

Thank you all for the replies so far, i will be quoting the sales of goods act when they call back.

Does anybody have advice on the 14 days (Cooling off period) ? Its not that ive changed my mind the goods are genuinely faulty, from what ive read im assuming the 14 days have nothing to do with my situation and as i have notified them within a reasonable time frame as OBITER mentioned i have the right to a full refund ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's on HP

Cancel the whole thing

And go get a TV that you wont pay for three times over from elsewhere

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sales of Goods Act is statutory duty.

 

The 14 days they mention might be in their terms and conditions but means squat in reality.

 

The goods are faulty, end of

 

No Brighthouse terms and conditions can diminish your statutory rights

 

Tell them to sod off and where it states their own T&C takes precedent over statutory duty

 

My advice will be to send that template like yesterday by recorded delivery. That will be evidence and a paper trail. Like i said you only have three to four weeks max

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's on HP

Cancel the whole thing

And go get a TV that you wont pay for three times over from elsewhere

 

Dx

 

Nothing to do with why i want a refund (The TV is genuinely faulty) However, i totally agree with you! I was 'Enticed in' with an offer for a new store, i just wish i had done my homework on the company and how they get there 'wicked way'. I think the tv was about £600 (already over inflated!) and the final cost was about £1200, off the top of my head!

Ill be buying one in full now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sales of Goods Act is statutory duty.

 

The 14 days they mention might be in their terms and conditions but means squat in reality.

 

The goods are faulty, end of

 

No Brighthouse terms and conditions can diminish your statutory rights

 

Tell them to sod off and where it states their own T&C takes precedent over statutory duty

 

My advice will be to send that template like yesterday by recorded delivery. That will be evidence and a paper trail. Like i said you only have three to four weeks max

 

Confirmed my suspicions! Thanks very much for your help!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Afternoon JonLawley,

 

Thank you for getting in touch in regards to your television.

 

I would like to apologise that you were delivered a product that is not of a satisfactory condition and you decided to return this rather than take the offer of a replacement.

 

In order for me to look into the situation for you, please can you contact the customer relations either by phone on 0800 526069 or email to [email protected].

 

Please quote or include the reference number 229023 during your contact so your account can be located.

 

Alternatively, please contact your local store and request to speak to your Store Manager.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Many thanks

 

Jason

Web Relations

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am unsure if Brighthouse finance the goods themselves or use an outside finance company. If they do you will also need to send them a copy of the letter rejecting the goods by recorded delivery.

 

If memory serves me right that is Caversham Finance but check the agreement they gave you

 

http://www.192.com/atoz/business/watford-wd25/sc/caversham-finance-ltd/2162737082b146d39fe17e19f3b7da8a94a4f841/comp/

 

I cannot stress enough you are against the clock so get that letter sent by recorded delivery

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...