Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • doesn't matter you've admitted about the DN and anyway where have you done that and to whom?   by assignment arrows are the creditor regardless to your acking of that fact or not.      
    • Just ignore the letter.   Block/bounce their emails or let them come through so you know what they're up to, and keep us posted.............   😎
    • Thanks DX,   I've already admitted that a default notice was served in 2010 by MBNA, so it seems I might be left hoping that they're unable to produce the original CCA.   I've never acknowledged Arrrow as the creditor and continue to pay MBNA.  Is that in my favour?   Cheers,   Richard.
    • For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]       please answer the following questions.       1 Date of the infringement  10/07/2019       2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]  12/07/19      3 Date received  13/07/19      4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?/    Yes      5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?  yes      6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]  yes  Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up  yes      7 Who is the parking company?  Civil enforcement      8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]    10B QUEENS ROAD, CONSETT, DH8 0BH       For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Yes    …………………..     This is what I sent to CE appeal in my own words   Reason For Appeal: Firstly I had an appointment at that time with the dentist. My last visit 2 years ago the car park was free and was not aware of the new parking system.   The sign at the front is very obscure especially turning right into the car park. Where I did park, the sign opposite was turned 90 degrees making it hard to see.   The door at the surgery was wedged open when I entered not realizing there was a sign relating to the new system . I cannot remember if there was any signs inside the surgery but once in I always pick up a magazine to read until the dentist is ready to see me.      My statement and evidence to POPLA. in response to CE evidence highlighting main arguments.   Par 18 . The image submitted from the Appellant of a sign slightly turned is still readable and is not obscured...….. Me Not from where I was parked. A photo from the bay shows a pole with the sign facing away.  Par 18 . Furthermore, it highlights that the Appellant was aware of the signage on the site and failed to comply with the terms and conditions regardless.......  Me I treat this paragraph with contempt. There is nothing to "highlight" here as I maintain I did not see any signage; Regardless ? I could have legally parked right outside the Surgery as there were spaces at the time but having "regard" for disabled and elderly, parked further away having to cross a busy road to the Surgery. Par 20....,. Furthermore, the Appellant failed to utilise the operator’s helpline phone number,,, (displayed at the bottom of signage) to report the occurrence, or to request advice on what further action could be taken.... Me How could I have done this ? I only realized there were signs there when the PCN arrived. Summary. I stand by statements and maintain that I did not see any signage entering or leaving the car park. The main sign at the entrance is too small and easily missed when you have to turn right though busy traffic and once through carefully avoid pedestrians, some walking their dogs. The main sign is blank at the back. When you leave the car park I would have noticed the private parking rules if the writing was on both sides. Roadworks signs close to the parking sign at the time did not help either. [see photo] CE evidence is flawed, illegal and contemptuous. Photos submitted are from months ago, Today I have driven into the car park and noticed the same signs turned 90 degrees including the one opposite my bay. CE have done nothing to rectify this disregarding my evidence and the maintenance of the car park. Showing number plates is a total disregard to patients privacy and I object to these photos being allowed as evidence on the grounds that they may be illegal.    POPLAS assessment and decision....unsuccessful   Assessor summary of operator case   The operator states that the appellant’s vehicle was parked on site without a permit. It has issued a parking charge notice (PCN) for £100 as a result. Assessor summary of your case   The appellant states that he parked on site to attend a dental appointment. He states that the terms of the site had changed since the last time he parked two years ago. He states that signage at the entrance to and throughout the site did not make the terms clear. The appellant has provided various photographs taken on and around the site. Assessor supporting rational for decision   The appellant accepts that he was the driver of the vehicle on the date in question. I will therefore consider his liability for the charge as the driver.   The operator has provided photographs of the appellant’s vehicle taken by its automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras. These photographs show the vehicle entering the site at 14:17 and leaving the site at 15:13. It is clear that the vehicle remained on site for a period of 56 minutes.   Both the appellant and operator have provided photographs of the signs installed on the site. The operator has also provided a site map showing where on site each sign is located.   Having reviewed all of the evidence, I am satisfied that signage at the entrance to the site clearly states: “Permit Holders Only … See car park signs for terms and conditions”.   Signs within the site itself clearly state: “DENTAL PRACTICE PERMIT HOLDERS ONLY … ALL PATIENTS AND VISITORS MUST REGISTER FOR A PERMIT AT THE PRACTICE RECEPTION ... IF YOU BREACH ANY OF THESE TERMS YOU WILL BE CHARGED £100.”   The signs make the terms of parking on the site clear, are placed in such a way that a motorist would see the signs when parking and are in line with the British Parking Association (BPA) Code of Practice.   The operator has provided evidence to show that a search for the appellant’s vehicle has been carried out against the list of vehicles for which a valid permit was held on the date in question. The appellant’s vehicle does not appear on this list.   The appellant states that he parked on site to attend a dental appointment . I accept that this may have been the case, however I do not accept that this entitled the appellant to park on site outside of the terms.   The appellant states that the terms of the site had changed since the last time he parked two years ago. The operator’s photographs of the signage on site are dated 27 March 2019.   It is clear based on these photographs that the terms had been in place for at least three months by the time the appellant parked, which I am satisfied was a reasonable period for any regular user of the site to adapt to any change to the terms.   The appellant states that signage at the entrance to and throughout the site did not make the terms clear. He has provided various photographs taken on and around the site.   As detailed above, I am satisfied based on the evidence as a whole that signage made the terms sufficiently clear. I am satisfied from the evidence that the terms of the site were made clear and that the appellant breached the terms by parking without registering for a permit.   I am therefore satisfied that the PCN was issued correctly and I must refuse this appeal.   docs1.pdf
  • Our picks

Lillychick

Cabot/Wright Hassall claimform - old Halifax Aqua Card 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1284 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon

 

I have received a CC claim form from the above. It's in relation to an Aqua credit card and is for an amount just short of £2000.

I did receive a letter from WH a couple of weeks ago but truth be told I pretty much ignored it. I'm not sure if the debt is statute barred or not, If it isn't it must be a whisker away from it. I don't recall having heard from Cabot about this matter for quite some time.

It's been several years since I tackled any debt problems and I'm very rusty on how to proceed.

 

I know I need to send a CCA request to start with. Do I send this to WH or Cabot?

I know I need to send a SAR. Do I send this to Cabot? Or Aqua? (I don't even know if Aqua still exist)

Is there anything else I need to request from any of the above.

 

Apologies for all the questions. I really am that out of touch with this stuff. Any help would be much appreciated.

 

I did use be a regular user of this forum quite a few years back. I don't remember my original username and the email address I used back then is long gone, so I have re-registered. Thanks in advance for any assistance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lillychick

 

Some of the guys like DX will advise you on the CCA, SAR and CPR side of things and Andyorch on your defence. In the meantime, could you read this link and then post up the answers to the various questions -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

Cheers!

 

Sham

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sham. That was a quick reply!

My memory is a bit sketchy re dates but I've answered as best I can. I have no paperwork from that long ag t refer back to.

 

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot Financial

 

Date of issue – . 21 September 2015

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimants claim is for debts arising from Consumer Credit Act 1974 agreements.

The claimant is an assignee of the following debts,

notice of assignment having been given t the defendant in writing.

Bank of Scotland Aqua card credit card. Account number (16 digit number) £18xx.xx.

2.Despite demands for payment, the above sums remain due.

The claimant therefore claims the sum of £18xx.xx interest under s.69 County courts act 1984 and costs.

 

What is the value of the claim? £2003.xx in total

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? No

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? I am unsure of this. It was either 2006 or 2007 but I can't narrow it down further than that

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned

and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Cabot financial

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned

did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No. I have had a couple of house moves though between then and now

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? i can't remember but see previous answer

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments?

I was in a pretty bad way financially at the time.

To be honest I was drowning in debt, some of which I ignored at the time

 

What was the date of your last payment? I don't know.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? No

 

Thank you again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Please do your best to narrow down when your account opened. There is a massive difference between accounts opened before a certain time in 2007 and those afterwards,


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you check if there's a default on your credit file for this debt? This might give you a fair indication as to whether it's statute barred or not - assuming no payments or acknowledgement has been made since then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was your old username even a guess of part of it please


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, ever requested a CCA. Cabot rarely ever hold the right paperwork, and if they see an amount for a few thousand, they will jump at a claim hoping to get a judgement without you realising.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi there

 

Please do your best to narrow down when your account opened. There is a massive difference between accounts opened before a certain time in 2007 and those afterwards,

 

Hi

I think the only way I can do this is by requesting a copy of the original credit agreement.

 

I can remember that I applied online and that's about it.

 

I realise that it makes a difference to things but without any paperwork and it being so long ago, I can't say for sure.

 

I had a lot of messy stuff going on with finances back then.

 

Several credit cards, loans etc.

 

I will have a look on my credit file later tonight to see if that sheds any light on things, thanks for the suggestion Shamrocker.

 

I also meant to ask,

do I need to do anything on the money claim website yet?

 

DX100UK I'm afraid

I don't and as I said the email I used back then has long since been defunct so I couldn't even retrieve my details.

 

I wasn't a very prolific poster but I did make use the site to help with a bank charges claim amongst other things.

 

I was one of the ones who took a partial settlement from Barclays for about two thirds of my claim. That would have also been around 2007/8 I think.

 

Oh I've managed to find this on my credit file. Details are:

 

Account started 07/11/2007

Default Date 15/04/2010

Default Balance £1539

 

I have never made contact with Cabot over this at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK well could get sticky as its post Apr 2007 sign up

 

Pop up on mcol

Register as a new user

Then log in and ack AOS the claim

Defend all

Leave jurisdiction unticked

 

CCA request to Cabot

CPR 31:14 from the legal section of the library to wh

 

Don't sign anything blank £1 PO for cca


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and you've ack'd the claim too?


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from WH this morning.

 

'We note that the value of this claim is less than £10,000 and therefore this claim is likely to be allocated to the small claims track. It is therefore likely that CPR r.31.14 will not apply. However, in order to comply with our disclosure obligations as they arise, we have also requested copies of the relevant documentation from our client and will forward these documents to you on receipt.

 

Please note that this does not change the time limits given to respond to a claim.

 

We trust this assists'

 

I've not had anything back from Cabot yet following the CCA request.

 

Can anyone advise what, if anything, I should be doing now? I'm aware that the time limit is creeping up.....

 

Thanks in advance for any advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing usual rubbish they sent to unsettle you.

 

 

just don't miss you def filing date!


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying. I'm assuming if the documents are not forthcoming by that time then that is what I put in the def?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lots of examples here

 

 

simply copy and paste your thread heading into the search cag of the red top toolbar


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for this, it's very helpful. I have heard nothing back from WH or from Cabot.

 

Unfortunately I have been dealing with a more pressing issue the last few weeks and this one has inadvertently been put on the back burner. Thats not giving me a great deal of time but thanks to the examples in the link I should be able to put something suitable together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get you finger out

 

Def is due by 4pm Friday

 

Post it here 1st

And we'll check it

 

Dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Get you finger out

 

Def is due by 4pm Friday

 

Post it here 1st

And we'll check it

 

Dx

 

Yes I know I'm cuttting it fine. Unavoidable unfortunately.

I'm hoping to have it finished tonight. Thank you for the kind offer to check it. Much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Post to get to 10 posts as I'm getting an error message about links or images even though my post doesn't contain any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok this is what I've put together. Largely taken from the list of examples in the link. So thank you to everyone who posts them. What with my rustiness and time constraints, I'm mighty relieved for the help.

 

 

POC

 

 

1.The claimants claim is for debts arising from consumer credit

link3.gif Act 1974 agreements.

 

2.The claimant is an assignee of the following debts, notice of assignment having been given t the defendant in writing. [/color]

Bank of Scotlandlink3.gif Aqua card credit card. Account number (16 digit number) £18xx.xx.

3.Despite demands for payment, the above sums remain due.

The claimant therefore claims the sum of £18xx.xx interest under s.69 County courts act 1984 and costs.

 

DEFENCE

 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

I have in the past had financial dealings with Bank of Scotland.

I have not had any financial dealings with the claimant.

I am not aware of and have not been given the written Notice of Assignment referred to in the Particulars of Claim.

I have received no demands for payment from the claimant.

 

I have received no statements or Notice of Sums in Arrears given that the claimants plead they are the legal owner of any alleged debt.

It is my understanding and pursuant to the CCA 2006 amendments that the claimant is prevented from any enforcement during this lack of service.

 

Notwithstanding the above, requests for information pursuant to the consumer credit Act (section 78) and CPR 31.14 were made.

The requests were sent on 24th September 2015 by Recorded Delivery Post.

Both the claimant and their solicitors received the requests on 25th September 2015.

To date I have received no response or acknowledgement from the claimant.

I received a letter from the claimant’s solicitor on 3rd October 2015 stating that they had requested the relevant documentation from their client.

I have received no correspondence from them since.

 

As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer Credit Act 1974

 

It is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any alleged monies to Cabot Financial (UK) Limited.

 

The Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© evidence of any nature of breach and show service of a Default Notice and Notice of sums in Arrears.

(d) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello folks,

 

 

I thought I would post an update on my case.

 

 

Unfortunately for me, shortly after all this happened I was thrown a giant curveball Healthwise

that has kind of engulfed me for the last few months.

 

 

Onwards and upwards.

 

After filing my defence I was contacted by the mediation service.

After a brief conversation they concluded that mediation wasn't appropriate as I didn't acknowledge the debt.

 

 

I recieved a court date for my local court which is on Friday this week 8/4.

I've submitted my documents to the court, WH and also Cabot.

There wasn't much as I hadn't heard a peep from either of them.

 

 

I only had my proofs of postage for my CCA request to Cabot and my request for docs to WH,

as well as copies of those requests,

 

 

WH reply to me early October 2015 acknowledging my request and telling me they had requested docs from Cabot.

That was it.

Nothing at all from Cabot.

 

Last week I recieved a copy of an adjournment request from WH.

They had asked the court for a 6 week adjournment to obtain the docs I'd requested.

Over 6 months later?

 

 

Okay. I had a phone message from the court today informing me the adjournment had been denied

and the case is going ahead on Friday.

 

I'm hoping this can only be good news and no documents will be forthcoming by Friday.

I have not given this matter the attention that I normally would have.

 

 

I have chemo brain fog! (it's true....it does exist!)

Hopefully I have done enough by asking for the documents I did

and keeping tabs on what little paperwork there was,

enough to look like I did what I could.

They clearly haven't did very much or anything at all.

 

I will of course let you know what happens on Friday.

Apologies again for the lack of follow up.

I do know it helps others to post info on these cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have failed to serve their disclosure and witness statement at this stage so close to trial...they have no evidence to rely on come the trial...court should strike it out Lilly.

 

But its imperative you inform the court on your arrival that they have failed to comply with Court Directions.

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it certainly doesnt look like they are going to produce anything, keep in regular touch with the court to make sure they dont do any last ditch document filing and you must go to court on friday, whether they confirm docs or not.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...