Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/? claimform - old jjb storecard - counterclaiming all is PPI/Penalties


MadKit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of Claimant - Cabot Financial (UK) Limited

Date of issue – 8th September 2015 – issued counterclaim, defence dated by Mortimer Clarke Solicitors 14th September, received 18th September.

 

What is the claim for (verbatim) –

 

 

1.By an agreement between original creditor & the Defendant dated xx/xx/2003 (“the Agreement”)

original creditor agreed to issue the Defendant with a store card.

The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments Due & the Agreement was terminated.

The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant on xx/03/2015.

 

 

THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 2xxx.x0

 

What is the value of the claim? 21xx.x0

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Store card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before 2007

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned

and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser - Cabot

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not aware and as far as I know not received

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year? No

Why did you cease payments? Waiting for SAR which was not received, in fact they took the £10 fee for full disclosure and applied it to the account instead.

What was the date of your last payment? 1/09/2010

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, made a SAR to original creditor which they never responded to, see above.

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes and was making payments on this plan and asked for SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot Financial have sent two claim forms now.

 

 

The first claim form was for a very inflated amount on a debt they said they now owned.

We sent back a counter claim and a request for Mediation.

The next thing we received was a letter saying the claim was being withdrawn and asking for our agreement.

 

 

We sent back a letter saying we agreed to this with the following terms:

 

The claim and the debt associated with it could not be claimed for again

No further action could be taken in any form by Cabot Financial or the original creditor

Any adverse credit notices or entries would be removed from all credit agencies

 

Nothing further on that one and claim was stopped.

Two weeks later another claim form for a catalogue account for which there was no balance owing to actual purchases.

The balance on the account is made up of Late fee and over limit charges, 3D PPI and CCP charges.

This alone is more than the "balance" with statutory interest applied, the total is more than £1100 what is "owed".

 

 

We submitted a counter claim along the lines of the first one and they've come back with the most confusing defence I've ever seen.

 

1. The Defendant disputes the full amount of the claim but does not provide full details.

For the avoidance of doubt, the content of Defendant's Defence is denied.

The Claimant asserts .... agreement etc etc.

The agreement was assigned to Claimant on xx/03/15

The Defendant is liable for the outstanding balance in relation to the agreement.

 

2. The Reply is repeated and the Claimant/Part 20 Defendant denies and disputes the Counterclaim.

The Defendant/Part 20 Claimant has failed to particularise in the Counterclaim how the amounts state have been calculated.

In the circumstances the Claimant/Part 20 Defendant is unable to file a detailed defence beyond that set out herein.

 

3. The Claimant/Part 20 Defendant denies the Defendant/Part 20 Claimant is entitled to the amounts claimed.

It is understood that charges applied in respect of this matter were incurred in accordance with the Agreement's terms and conditions.

Further, it is denied that such amounts should be sought from the Claimant/Part 20 Defendant.

...Claimant assigned agreement from original creditor..

. The Claimant/Part 20 Defendant was assigned the benefit of the contract.

Therefore the Defendant/Part 20 Claimant should raise the issue of charges with ..original creditor.

 

4. Accordingly, the Claimant/Part 20 Defendant's position is that it can have no liability to repay any sums in respect of charges

and any queries regarding charges must be directed to ... original creditor

 

5. The Claimant/Part 20 Defendant requests that the counterclaim be struck out pursuant to the court's case management powers

contained in CPR Part 3 for the reasons set out above.

 

We sent off for DPA subject access on 11 October 2011 by registered letter but received nothing back.

How do we respond to this?

Should we send off a CPR 31.14 request to Cabot?

Or do we need to detail the counterclaim by sending copies of the calculations

and all the account statements to the court?

 

One thing really confuses me,

they were assigned the "benefits of the contract" but says we must address any charges

(the whole balance is made up of charges) to the original creditor.

 

 

What do we do now please?

Edited by citizenB
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

People should be around later who can give you the detail you need.

 

IN meantime

 

"We sent off for DPA subject access on 11 October 2011 by registered letter but received nothing back. How do we respond to this?"

 

It is a bit late to be trying to chase that particular subject access request. My feeling is a new one would need to be sent. Did they cash the "£10 fee?"

 

For any counter claim you will need the exact figures for late payment charges etc and statements. (To be put in a bundle when the time comes) and also the interest rate the OC charged at.

 

I am not surprised that they are trying to say that the OC would have to be the target of your "Counter claim" Not sure they can insist on separating the issues. Normally your claim for charges etc WOULD got to the OC. But they have brought the account and assigned all the benefits AND Duties that come with it. AndyOrch would be the one to ask for this :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you SabreSheep. To answer your questions:

 

"We sent off for DPA subject access on 11 October 2011 by registered letter but received nothing back. How do we respond to this?"

 

It is a bit late to be trying to chase that particular subject access request. My feeling is a new one would need to be sent. Did they cash the "£10 fee?" - Yes they did cash in the £10 fee, we have the original letter and proof of posting too.

 

For any counter claim you will need the exact figures for late payment charges etc and statements. (To be put in a bundle when the time comes) and also the interest rate the OC charged at. We have all the original bar two but have worked out what the charges were on the missing two statements. The charges are all detailed in an Excel spreadsheet along with the 8% stat interest ready to be sent to the court. Do you think we should send this now?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 8% interest

 

What about the interest rate the OC charged you on those charges?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought that the spread sheet detailing the charges/PPI etc, would satisfy the requirements for clarifying your claim.

 

Those items should have been reclaimed from the original creditor, they are correct in that. However, they are bringing their claim on a £sum that is not genuinely owed - I would have thought their best move would have been to return the account to the original creditor ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have sent S.O.S for some further advice for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent the claimant a cca request since the claim form?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice.

 

No I was going to do CCA request now along with the CPR 31.14, is that the right thing to do?

 

 

Also, how do I respond to this defence or do I just say in order to respond I need the documentation they have been tasked with producing?

 

 

I know they delayed sending this defence out in order to eat up time

so don't want to run out of time and have the court say they've decided to strike out the counterclaim because we haven't responded in time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the claim is under £20,000 then it will likely be heard in the small claims court. The meaning of that is that they don't have to respond to CPR 31.14 requests and seeing as it is Mortimer Clarke/Cabot, they will most likely not.

 

You should however send the CPR request immediately (just to show that you have been attempting to obtain the paperwork) and that goes to the solicitor. It contains a request for the agreement within the request if you use the draft linked below.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387484-LEGAL-CPR-31.14-Request-Request-for-information-when-a-Claim-has-been-issued.

 

You can only request those items that have been mentioned or implied within the PoC. Anything else you would need to request via CPR part 18 - which is a request for information only.

 

The CCA request would need to go separately to Cabot/Claimant

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you! Off to do that now as I have both letters waiting.

 

 

Do I need to copy these to the court?

 

 

I'm worried out running out of time to respond to their defence of my counterclaim.

 

 

How do I need to respond to this please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no copies to court required

 

so deadline is Friday 9th oct by 4pm.

 

I'm sure you could simply file std holding defence/ no paperwork

 

there must be one on here which includes a mention of bal of claim is PPI/penalties etc.

 

who was the cat company please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 2 says a cat claim form but post 1 says store card,......so which is it???

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thanks

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't need to send anything to the court

as long as you have ack'd [aos] the claim defend all on mcol website

 

 

you defence is due on day 33 from the date on the top right of the claimform [that's day 1 of the count]

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We filled in the AOS as part of the counterclaim we sent back,

it was just the bit about defending all the claim etc I believe.

 

 

Do we need to acknowledge their defence in any way?

 

 

You've mentioned sending back a "standard" defence but I don't know what that is.

 

 

I think we are about 10 days from the 33 day mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence deadline is Friday 9th oct by 4pm I think

 

 

we bit of time yet

 

 

nothing more for you to do I don't think.

 

 

let the more clever ones with regard to legal matters confirm things

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...