Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Composing letter to Lowlife - old lloyds credit card debt


Gumboil
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just discovered that the address on the Lloyds letter ( Lloyds TSB Plc, Credit Operations, PO Box 66, Rosyth, KY11 2WG) is actually the same address and PO number as a company called Blair, Oliver and Scott who seem to be the in-house collection agency of HBOS according to other posts on this forum. Curiously, no contact telephone number is included on the letter

 

Now I'm puzzled. Can I use this address to write to requesting the SAR? Do I address the letter to Blair, Oliver and Scott or LloydsTSB at that address? Alternatively do I write to BLS Collections? I've got no other address for LloydsTSB.

 

I've not sent off a CCA request to Lloyds.

Blair Oliver Scott =BOS = Bank of Scotland in house collections.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar gets you ALL the documentation they hold on your

 

statements, comms log, account details the lot!!

 

a cca request, solely gets you a copy of the agreement & a statement of the CURRENT status of the account.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you please explain the benefit of sending a SAR request to Lloyds rather than a CCA request to the DCA? I also don't understand how BOS are involved in any of this.

 

Apologies for being naive over this.

 

Thanks

 

In addition to dxs answer Lloydstsb Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) all on group which now uses aany one of the in house collections departments of the group.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add.the SAR may not get you a copy of the agreement. It also costs 10 quid. A cca request will get you a copy of the agreement so you can judge your position. If they can not find one the can not enforce and if they do find one it has to be compliant.

They must send

The agreement

Terms and conditions at inception

Terms and conditions at default

A current balance.

 

All sent together.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok there have been further developments today.

 

Wetcloths have been quick off the mark and sent me a red headed letter titled "Important Notice of Debt Collection".

 

They state that they have been instructed on behalf of their client to collect the outstanding balance on their behalf.

An adjacent box states that they are writing on behalf of Lloyds TSB.

 

They want me to reply immediately to the letter either by paying the balance in full or contacting them by phone.

These are the only ways I can avoid them taking further action. Failure to do so "will result in further recovery action"

 

I have no intention of phoning them as per the advice constantly given on the forum.

 

However, I'm reluctant to write to Lloyds for a SAR not only because of ten pound cost but also because I still have my one and only current account with them

with associated DD's on fuel and phone linked to the account along with my DLA - Rocking the boat right now with these could cause serious problems.

 

Would it still be worthwhile sending a CCA request to Wetcloths and seeing what develops?

The only other option I seem to have is to wait the seven days they've provided me to reply and see what they do next.

 

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'they' wetcloths, can do nothing to you.

 

they do not own the debts.

 

get a parachute account , say with the co-op

 

and get you income paid in there ASAP.

 

you are at risk of off setting.

 

as for any retaliatory action because of the SAR that not possible.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get that sar done

 

then sit on your hands

 

stop worrying .

 

nothing more you can do till you have the info.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add.the SAR may not get you a copy of the agreement. It also costs 10 quid. A cca request will get you a copy of the agreement so you can judge your position. If they can not find one the can not enforce and if they do find one it has to be compliant.

They must send

The agreement

Terms and conditions at inception

Terms and conditions at default

A current balance.

 

All sent together.

 

AND any other document mentioned in the agreement.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

tI am still not sure as to why you want to SAR when you haven't yet done a cca request,

Time saving and more likely to produce useful data requests lack of CCA have lost impact as a tool.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not quite following this. Surely the purpose of a CCA is to establish the right of the DCA to collect the debt. Having seen previous DCA's floundering around seeking original agreements (or copies thereof) and "suspending collection activities" until they can come up with the goods, surely a CCA request will fit the bill here again - two of my previous DCA's have backed off since I've disputed the validity of the guff they sent me.

 

The only thing different here is that Wetcloths don't seem to have bought the debt from Lloyds. Would this make a difference?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Wescot are simply assigned to manage/collect the debt they will have to refer all matters back to LLoyds for action, if you want all the data send the SAR which may give info that can clear this up or send the CCA request and start letter tennis all over again.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi all

 

I've written about a credit card debt originally with Lloyds on here previously.

The debt was managed by their own BLS Collections until I went into hospital and missed a payment,

when without warning BLS sold it on to a string of DCA's one after the other.

 

 

I was annoyed as BLS acted without even asking me why a payment had been missed.

 

I've fended off five DCA's over this debt subsequently

because each of them has failed to supply the original credit agreement.

 

 

Oddly, I even have a letter from Lloyds who wrote to me directly after one DCA request

and admitted in writing that the original credit agreement was unretrievable.

 

This time around Lowlife have been on the case.

I sent them the OCA request and the failure to comply letter a fortnight later as per usual.

 

 

They've backed off after a month stating that they bought the debt from Lloyd's in good faith after being assured it was viable to collect.

 

The problem that I have is that they've not returned my £1.00 postal order and I'm narked about it.

 

 

Yes, I intend to write to them to request the reimbursement but I'm dying to point out to them that Lloyd's knowingly sold to them an unretrievable debt.

 

 

Caveat Emptor as they say. They've been taken for a ride by Lloyd undoubtedly,

 

 

is there some way I could politely point this out to them, possibly with some humour?

 

 

It just goes to show that even the big lenders can deceive DCA's when they sell debts on.

 

Thanks all.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just let it go. They cannot collect and they know it. As for the postal order, it's only a quid. Sure, theres more to it than that, matter of principle etc.

 

They know the debt is bad, they dont care the debt is bad. They rely on debtors lack of knowledge to get them to pay up regardless.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I've written about a credit card debt originally with Lloyds on here previously. The debt was managed by their own BLS Collections until I went into hospital and missed a payment, when without warning BLS sold it on to a string of DCA's one after the other. I was annoyed as BLS acted without even asking me why a payment had been missed.

 

I've fended off five DCA's over this debt subsequently because each of them has failed to supply the original credit agreement. Oddly, I even have a letter from Lloyds who wrote to me directly after one DCA request and admitted in writing that the original credit agreement was unretrievable.

 

This time around Lowlife have been on the case. I sent them the OCA request and the failure to comply letter a fortnight later as per usual. They've backed off after a month stating that they bought the debt from Lloyd's in good faith after being assured it was viable to collect.

 

The problem that I have is that they've not returned my £1.00 postal order and I'm narked about it. Yes, I intend to write to them to request the reimbursement but I'm dying to point out to them that Lloyd's knowingly sold to them an unretrievable debt. Caveat Emptor as they say. They've been taken for a ride by Lloyd undoubtedly, but is there some way I could politely point this out to them, possibly with some humour? It just goes to show that even the big lenders can deceive DCA's when they sell debts on.

 

Thanks all.

 

Thank you

 

Funny enough with a relatives debt, Lowells sold it onto another DCA knowing that they could not collect, as the debtor lived abroad. I wrote to the compliance manager at the other DCA saying that Lowells had either made a mistake or had failed to disclose that the debt was unenforceable, plus Lowell had increased the debt amount for no apparent reason. Within a few months the debt was back with Lowells and the debt amount was corrected. They later had to write it off and pay compensation for their conduct.

 

So a gentle letter to Lowells Director of Legal and Compliance advising them that they appear to have not been advised by Lloyds about the true status of the debt and although they buy on a bulk basis, they should be more thorough with due diligence, to save being stitched up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...