Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A devaluing currency and hard economic conditions make cryptocurrencies attractive despite the risks. View the full article
    • The Serum Institute of India isn't a household name, but it's the world's largest vaccine maker. View the full article
    • Lower commuting costs, cancelled holidays and fewer meals out boost some bank accounts, a report says. View the full article
    • Lower commuting costs, cancelled holidays and fewer meals out boost some bank accounts, a report says. View the full article
    • Thanks for the reply     Name of the Claimant ? CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) LIMITED   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 18/02/2021   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total) -   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? By anagreement between New Day Ltd RE Marbles & the Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant. THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 2140.14  2. Costs   What is the total value of the claim? £2325.14   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I could have   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Not Sure but im going to look back on old emails. But I think it would have been around 2018.   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? If I did it would have been online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No but there is a DCA on there that could be for this.   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser by the looks of it.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I could have but I’ll need to look back.   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not sure but its possible.   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not sure but its possible.    What was the date of your last payment? I don’t know.   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

My van is insured but not registered on the motor insurance database

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1993 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Hopefully this is the correct place to post my problem.Sorry it is a bit long winded but am at my wits end now!!


My current van insurance policy began in Febuary with Commercial Vehicle Direct(CVD) and underwritten by Ageas.

In May I received a letter from the motor insurance database(MID) to say my van was not on the database and for me to take action.

I immediately phoned CVD who told me the problem would be sorted out in the next few days so I thought nothing of it.


I was pulled over by the police in June during the day because my reg plate came up as uninsured on the police computer.I was held in the police car while they phoned through to CVD to confirm that the van was insured.

I immediately phoned up CVD and was told once again the problem would be resolved.I thought OK its probably an oversight and will get sorted.


I came home on Monday to find a government wheelclamping contractors large yellow sticker on my windscreen warning me to insure my vehicle or be fined/clamped/seized.


So I phoned CVD on the Tuesday morning and they tell me it will be sorted in 48 hours.

48 hours were up this morning and still I am not on the database!

I phone back again.They tell me it will be sorted at some point in the next few days.

I have phoned Ageas the underwriters today and they have told me I will be on the database by Saturday or the will speak to their IT department.

I really feel I am being fobbed off everytime.


I believe it is a legal obligation for the insurance company to register my details on the database and according to the lady on the MID phoneline are subject to a "subtantial fine" if they dont within a certain time.


Meanwhile DVLA have issued me with a £100 fine!


If my details aren't on the database by Saturday I dont really know what the next step is for me.

CVD and Ageas are not fulfilling their side of the contract as far as I am concerned


If anyone can shed any light on where I can go from here I would really appreciate the advice.


Sorry for the long post but feeling very stressed by this right now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talk to the MID people about how to progress a complaint. It would be an easy win with the FOS and you will gain compensation to cover your costs, plus a small amount extra. But CVD should settle quickly to save you having to go to the FOS.


CVD should immediately pay you £100 so that you can settle the DVLA fine, but when you pay the fine you should advise them of the Insurers IT issues.


CVD should also compensate you for your costs and for inconvenience.


From what i have heard before CVD have a history of customer service problems and you should gain their acceptance that you are free to cancel your policy at no penalty, if they cannot get the MID updated by Monday at the latest. You cannot continue with this Insurer, if they are failing to meet basic standards.

We could do with some help from you.



 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group


If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately you have done all this on the phone so have no proof that they are aware of the problem. If you had done it by email or letter, you could have sent copies to the DVLA and the bill to your insurers.



Did they ask for the vehicle details when you rang ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much all who have taken the time to read my post and reply.

I contacted FOS today who were most helpful and are going to put things in motion.


However, after checking the MID for about the sixth time today, at about 10pm my van is now registered!!


Its only taken them six months to put it on the database !!!

Will not be going any where near CVD and Ageas in the future

I am appalled by this and hope I dont have to make a claim whilst insured with them.


On the plus side I have found a great forum here

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep your (Paper) Certificate of Insurance with you or a downloaded copy from the Insurer's website.


If you produce this and the police still seize your vehicle the seizure would not comply with the law so you could then pursue the police force for losses you incur

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still intrigued by the DVLA £100 fine. Did you pay it? I wouldn't accept CVD just reimbursing me the £100 because that would mean as far as DVLA were concerned that you agreed you had acting improperly, that your vehicle wasn't insured. Having CVD reimburse the £100 wouldn't take it off DVLA records, as far as DVLA are concerned you were still 'guilty'. I'd be furious about that if it was me. I'd be demanding that CVD provided me with a statement that I had been insured at time DVLA issued Penalty Notice and admitting it was their error it wasn't on MID. Then I'd insist DVLA cancelled the Penalty Notice. The offence DVLA can issue Penalty Notice for is the vehicle not being insured. There's no such offence by the vehicle owner of not being on MID. There's no obligation on the owner, nor can they do anything directly to put themselves on MID. So they shouldn't be penalised if insurer fails to do what they should.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...