Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Huge fine from DVLA can I appeal amount


Manxdude
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,I've read lots of DVLA threads with interest,and came to the conclusion (removed)

 

That said,here's my story and question.

 

I had a sorn on my campervan since Sept 2014 and had it parked on my private driveway since,apart from recently,and so my tail of woe begins.

 

After several requests,soon becoming pleas from my wife to do something about the pretty untidy area in front of the house,including the drive,I finally decided to get it all monoblocked,so of course I had to move the camper of it.

 

I moved the camper parking it right in front of my house (a quiet street and not a main road) and the work began (27 July 2015) and was finished by the 30 July. And a lovely job was done .

 

Unfortunately I couldn't return the camper to its original place straight away,as a manhole had been rebuilt,and in order to park on the drive I had to drive over it,and as the camper weights 3.5 tons I was advised to give the new concrete 10 to 14 days to fully harden (concrete takes 28 days to fully cure).

I went to move the vehicle back on the 15 August , it was only then I noticed the "you've been reported to the dvla for enforcement" sticker on the side window. Ho dear thought I,there's a £80 quid fine,although cheesed off,I was that happy with the new drive,and the wife's new found respect for me I just shrugged it off.

 

On the 18 August I received said fine of £452...... to say I was gob smacked would be an understatement !

 

Also they said the vehicle was reported on the 14 August, the letter (fine they sent)was dated 18th ,received 25th August.....and said "I had not responded to their first letter" and was headed reminder..this was the first letter I got from them.

 

I wrote to them (registered post)explaining the situation,providing pictures,builders contact details and prove (as best I could) that the vehicle is normally always on the drive.i also explained (as proved by the dates) that the so called reminder was the first letter I received from them. (I mention this because I wondered if because they thought I ignored the first (none existent ) letter,is why the fine was so hefty)

 

I received their reply on the 8th sept (although letter dated 3rd) saying, thanks for your enquiry,we've considered it,but can find no reason to alter the original decision, pay up or else.....basically

 

So my question is , is there any way to appeal the amount as it seems very excessive ?

. The tax for a year is £260 yet there looking to fine me almost twice the amount...don't figure...

 

I have till the 20th of Sept to pay the fine, "to avoid court action",and they are" unable to accept instalments "

Their attitude makes my blood boil.......

 

Any how any info or advise anyone can give me, would be much appreciated, thanks for taking the time to read this rather long post..

 

Cheers

 

Manxdude

Link to post
Share on other sites

Owch, so you wrote to them and admitted in writing that you kept an unlicensed and SORNED vehicle on the public highway while works were carried out?

Avoiding Court action now is your priority...

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Owch, so you wrote to them and admitted in writing that you kept an unlicensed and SORNED vehicle on the public highway while works were carried out?

Avoiding Court action now is your priority...

 

Yep I did admit it in writing, on hindsight not the wisest move...but I'm an honest guy who made a genuine mistake and broke the law due more to ignorance than intent,and all though ignorance is no defence,I felt the circumstances do not justify the fine amount,I drove no more than 3 meters,twice...and yes public road all be it a quiet one,a road I pay towards maintaining,even though it like most roads in the UK are very badly maintained....ops I feel that blood boiling again.....deep breath and relax..ahhh that's better

 

I fully intend to avoid the courts as I know legally I don't have a leg to stand on, but was keen to know if there's any procedure to appeal the fine amount

 

Anyways thanks for the advice and taking the time to answer my post, 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

related issue thread albeit 2010

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?287626-DVLA-Fine-untaxed-vehicle-on-public-road-what-else-can-I-expect

 

the following link goes to a pdf document regarding enforcement. it may not be the latest.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCEQFjAAahUKEwiF_NaZ6OnHAhUBchQKHauYC1o&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fuploads%2Fsystem%2Fuploads%2Fattachment_data%2Ffile%2F403029%2FVehicle_Enforcement_Policy_Table_1__revised_.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHsr0jiV2H7dd9QOsbIRrLT6I0rSA

 

Your only real option is to check whether the amount they are charging you fits with the most recent up to date enforcement rules. Make sure you are being "charged" according to the appropriate offense as well.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for links sabresheep, I've looked at them,and seems the amount offered as OCS is what is in the guidelines.

And the other link was a guy who had very similar circumstances ,and got shafted.

I think the OCS should be based on individual circumstances, ie if actually driving on main road would be a higher fine/OCS than if parked outside your own house....

 

Looks like I will have to bite the bullet pay the fine/ocs and hope it doesn't make me bitter lol......

 

Will be interesting to see if my local MP will do anything about it, but I want hold my breath or expect to much as there's nothing in it for him, no expenses to be claimed,free trip or wage rise so why should he bother ......grrrr and breath......😀

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for that Conniff....

 

Fortunately I can afford it, but there's been a time in my life it would have caused me terrible financial hardship, and I can't help thinking that it could happen to anyone on the bread line,and the dvla attitude doesn't even allow for that possibility they just want their extortion money,and never mind your circumstances....its legalised racketeering and is an absolute disgrace .....and so blatant, at least Dick Turpin had wore a mask when he robbed someone :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

If trying to negotiate an out of Court settlement, bear in mind that DVLA have a great incentive to settle as they would receive all of the settlement. If it goes to Court, a fine goes into Government central funds, not DVLA who can only claim actual costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If trying to negotiate an out of Court settlement, bear in mind that DVLA have a great incentive to settle as they would receive all of the settlement. If it goes to Court, a fine goes into Government central funds, not DVLA who can only claim actual costs.

 

That's interesting,thanx for info 😀

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...