Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Debtor found guilty at trial of assaulting and obstructing a bailiff. Adjourned awaiting pre sentence reports.


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1844 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Under section 68.1 of Schedule 12 of the Tribunal Courts & Enforcement Act 2007 it is a very serious offence to obstruct a bailiff.

 

Last week yet another debtor was found guilty of this offence but even more seriously, he was also found guilty of assaulting the bailiff (the bailiff required stitches to his nose).

 

The debt was in relation to an unpaid penalty charge notice. Bailiffs attended the debtors property to request £422. It would seem that previous visits had also been made and on one of the visits, he had sworn at the bailiff before driving off. It was on the 4th visit that the incident occurred.

 

During the one day trial the debtors solicitor claimed that his client had suffered a stroke before the incident and this had led to him being unable to raise his left arm. Unfortunately for the debtor, the medical papers handed to the magistrates did not bear out the stroke claims stating only that Mr Gara had complained of 'weakness' in his arm.

 

After deliberating for 45 minutes, magistrates convicted Mr Gara of assault by beating on March 3rd and also of obstructing a lawful enforcement agent on the same occasion.

 

The presiding magistrate has requested pre sentence reports to be prepared before sentencing at the next hearing on 17th September.

 

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/news/news/15681/Bailiff-attacked-by-Thatcham-taxi-driver.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it not about time this Dickensian policy of Bailiff enforcement was outlawed, it is the 21st century??

 

Attachment of earnings and benefits are widely used now and will stop these Bailiffs compounding the original debt with astronomical charges on some of the poorest in society

 

They are not used here in Northern Ireland so no excuse to continue with them in the rest of the UK

Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it not about time this Dickensian policy of Bailiff enforcement was outlawed, it is the 21st century??

 

Attachment of earnings and benefits are widely used now and will stop these Bailiffs compounding the original debt with astronomical charges on some of the poorest in society

 

They are not used here in Northern Ireland so no excuse to continue with them in the rest of the UK

 

You are preaching to the converted here - unfortunately it falls on deaf ears to those who can make changes.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wasn't the camera rolling on this, something is not right about this . Looks like the EA knew already there could be issues.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Why wasn't the camera rolling on this, something is not right about this . Looks like the EA knew already there could be issues.

 

Perhaps there was camera footage. But i bet an EA company watch this and if they don't find it helpful, they find a technical fault with the camera. In the heat of the moment the EO might act in a way which undermines their case and opens them to action by Police or debtor.

 

There is a Data Protection issue with film footage taken by EO's. If the footage is regularly not available, at some point people will start to ask questions.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick Queston

 

If a Bailiff or plod come onto your property boundary wearing these body cameras,

 

I take it you are in your rights to request they turn them off??

 

After-all they are no longer in the public domain, but on your personal property

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quick Queston

 

If a Bailiff or plod come onto your property boundary wearing these body cameras,

 

I take it you are in your rights to request they turn them off??

 

After-all they are no longer in the public domain, but on your personal property

 

You can request. But they may refuse and you cannot do much about it. It would be up to a Judge whether the footage could be used in evidence.

 

You argue privacy rights, they argue defence rights etc etc. Not as if you can get a Judge to suddenly appear at the scene to make a decision.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it not about time this Dickensian policy of Bailiff enforcement was outlawed, it is the 21st century??

 

Attachment of earnings and benefits are widely used now and will stop these Bailiffs compounding the original debt with astronomical charges on some of the poorest in society

 

They are not used here in Northern Ireland so no excuse to continue with them in the rest of the UK

 

As per PT, my footer declares my opinion of enforcement, indeed Lord Denning in the 1980's was actively seeking to kill it off, but here we are in 2015, and the bailiffs still act as if it is 1215 and King John and the Sheriff of Nottingham are still around.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Would it make a difference if the bailiffs were made to work in-house at the different borough councils?

 

It would ensure there was some accountability for the Bailiff's actions.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
UPDATE,

 

The case against the debtor has been further adjourned until 8th October.

if guilty as charged why the delay?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
It would ensure there was some accountability for the Bailiff's actions.

 

In a climate where Council's budgets are being horrendously slashed, and they are desperately trying to come up with "get rich quick" schemes to fill the blackhole? I suspect In House Enforcement would be equally bad, if not worse. There would not really be any more accountability either, since, legally speaking, A Local Authority or anyone seeking to hire EA's is equally, vicariously, etc liable for the actions of the employees of the EA Company it contracts.

 

My local Council, Ceredigion, recently announced it was creating or significantly increasing charges for a variety of "Services" only to finally discover at a late stage, that every single one was outwith their legal control, any changes would have to be by legislation etc, either from the Welsh Senate, or Westminster.... We are not exactly talking about Professionals, when talking about most of the Management Sphere of local authorities, we are dealing with people who's ambitions and desires far outreach their abilities. Probably a problem of local and central Civil Service as a whole.

 

I bet in house enforcement would see debts being transferred over to enforcement far quicker, as the new TCOG fee's on top it would be immediately identified as a new extremely lucrative revenue stream on top of hitting tax collection targets.

 

Perhaps the only real benefit would be that at least Rogue EA's and potentially management could also be done for Malfeasance in Public Office etc when caught.

 

I caught a news article the other day saying that complaints against Police Officers/Forces have risen hugely recently, with a vast bulk of the complaints being on the lines of Constables/Forces failing to do their duty, and I did wonder if it would be worth or possible to do a Freedom of Information Request to get a basic breakdown of the actual complaint contents - as I wondered how many of those complaints might actually turn out to be instances of Constables/Superior Officers only "talking bailiff" refusing to investigate criminal action by EA's and so on.....

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Would the bench not want pre-sentence reports (PSR)

 

Indeed they did MF and this is why I had entitled the thread as follows:

 

Debtor found guilty at trial of assaulting and obstructing a bailiff. Adjourned awaiting pre sentence reports.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE:

 

As mentioned earlier, the defendant had another court hearing on 17th September and the case was further adjourned until yesterday.

 

At yesterdays hearing Mr Gara was found GUILTY. The court imposed the following:

 

A Community Order requiring him to undertake 150 hours of unpaid work.

 

A Compensation Order of £400

 

Victims Surcharge of £60

 

Crown Prosecution Costs of £500
Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the use of a MF is getting very expensive judging by the new amount now due. Plus having to do CS as well, is the risk and costs really worth using an unqualified MF?

 

 

Further to post #16 my Council has got to cut by 45m from their budget and the cost of Policing is going up too.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
UPDATE:

 

As mentioned earlier, the defendant had another court hearing on 17th September and the case was further adjourned until yesterday.

 

At yesterdays hearing Mr Gara was found GUILTY. The court imposed the following:

 

A Community Order requiring him to undertake 150 hours of unpaid work.

 

A Compensation Order of £400

 

Victims Surcharge of £60

 

Crown Prosecution Costs of £500

 

JasonB the (McKenzie in this case) frequently claims his 'Law Firm' charges the sum of £2500 to represent 'victims' in court. That forum needs to remove all links to Mr B especially his ' telephone consultation' hot line,

Link to post
Share on other sites
JasonB the (McKenzie in this case) frequently claims his 'Law Firm' charges the sum of £2500 to represent 'victims' in court. That forum needs to remove all links to Mr B especially his ' telephone consultation' hot line,

 

WD

 

No, he was not involved in this case. This defendant had been represented by a solicitor specialising in criminal proceedings as opposed to 'The Guru' who masquerades as a Lawyer.

 

The background story to this case is here:

 

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/news/n...xi-driver.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
WD

 

No, he was not involved in this case. This defendant had been represented by a solicitor specialising in criminal proceedings as opposed to 'The Guru' who masquerades as a Lawyer.

 

 

 

The background story to this case is here:

 

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/news/n...xi-driver.html

 

Sorry my comments were not meant for this thread I intended to post here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?453447-Another-debtor-found-guilty-under-Section-68(1)-of-TC

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...