Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Idem Servicing 1998 Lombard Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yes as previously detailed back in july 23rd in post 10.

 

i'd get that cra file before you do anything more

 

send that sar back with a copy of a recent util bill

 

are you at the same address as when the loans were taken out

 

if not include a list of previous addresses.

 

and send it to rbs not lombards

 

as for the ppi question

 

you can say this is a future possibility

however, i currently wish to gather all information of a financial nature first

as you believe you are being chased for debts that are statute barred

and wish to confirm this.

 

please send me my full SAR, i wish everything.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx,

 

I have been paying £10/m for over 7 years now to a variety of DCAs from an old debt arrangement made so statute barred is a non starter.

 

I will send a utility bill as suggested,

 

should I mention that Lombard have already corresponded with me at my new (5 years) address and that they should have my records on file?

 

Of the 3 CRAs which would you recommend?

thanks for your help so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell you of my fears

 

yes i know about your payments

 

but if the debt was written off years ago

then sold on a phishing list

 

i wonder if ANY of your payments HAVE actually gone off the debt.

 

but have been 'appropriated' by the various DCA's into their profit pocket.

 

then passed around, here we have a mug, you have some money from him.

 

we call this cash cowing.

 

if you fell for threat-o-grams years ago

or

the people you had the DMP with were 'in-bed'

with these DCA's [ as many are - esp if it were a fee paying DMP]

 

they would have not actually checked the legality of the debt before paying them.

 

as they were already doing you with a fee.

 

i'd go for credit expert

 

i bet this debt does not show.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

well i hope i'm wrong then

though its rare even for NDL or even Payplan or CCCS to actually CHECK they are legally owed

for that time period ....of recent they've wised up a bit.

 

 

but certainly to me

 

your story is one of classic cash cowing

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi all, Ive managed to do a bit on my own so far from reading advice but now need some more direct assistance pls.

 

HISTORYIn 1998 i took out a £5k loan with Lombard. it was a 2nd consolidation of a 1994 loan (original had PPI which I am currently dealing with RBS about (but a separate issue to this).

 

I defaulted on the loan in 2002 and through The National Debtline reduced payments to £10/m whilst I was in financial dire straits.

I sold my house in 2007 and offered Lombard appx £2500 (debt stood at just over £5k at the time) in full and final settlement

or i would use to pay off other debts which they turned down.

 

 

Some months later I recvd letter from Westcot say they now had the debt and I had to pay them

and I have been paying £10/m for nearly 13 years now.

The debt went to Arden for a few years but once I asked for and received a copy of the CCA

the debt was moved again shortly after to Idem Servicing (is this a coincidence?).

 

As of today I received 2 letters relating to the SAR I sent to RBS regarding this 1998 loan

- one says it gives me access to my data but does not entitle me to any Documents which may contain my data:???: confusing or what?

- the other letter is asking me to ring my 'Case Handler' to explain what exactly am I after.

 

This is where I need assistance;

do i call and what is it I am actually after?

is it proof they sold the loan

and do I actually owe Idem the money?

 

I may be being 'cash cowed' as you guys put it but need to know my next move pls

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes me thinks you have been cash cowed.

esp seeing the names in your list.

 

 

as for the SAR

I wold suspect they are trying to curcunvent the SAr by assuning your after the details for a PPI reclaim.

 

 

I'd be writing to them

and stating you wish ALL the details they hold on your

as you required them for your records.

 

 

you say they complied [the DCA you are paying ] with an enforceable CCA?

and who said it WAS enforceable?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 threads merged for history

 

 

please keep to one thread

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why oh why did you not stop paying this debt when advised to in 2011?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 threads merged for history

 

please keep to one thread

 

dx

 

sorry dx thought id posted here before but couldnt find my orig thread, thought it mightve been archived.

 

I keep putting it off but now getting letters monthly from Idem asking me to contact them

 

- all strangely since I contacted RBS??

 

Did Arden smell something when I asked for a copy of the CCA

as it was only a month later when it swapped to Idem?

 

ir is iy unenforceable.

Should I have got my credit report first?

 

have i done things wrong way around

Link to post
Share on other sites

cash cowed

have you been getting notice of assignments each time

and who is listed as the DCa's client if any?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx, just checked the last letter from idem- it says

Agreement type: unsecured credit agreement

Company Name; Idem capital securities

 

never noticed but no mention of Lombard

 

it goes on to say my balance was purchased by Idem first finance (if of any relevance)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had my SAR request reply today but there is nothing about the loan which I am being chased by Idem for, only my 2 original loans. A covering letter states

 

"...the account XXX/XXXX/XXXXXXXX mentioned on your request has actually been sold onto a third party company called Idem Servicing. We have forwarded all your details onto them".

 

The original DCA was Westcot then Arden and has been Idem for last few years.

 

Do I need to go back to RBS regarding why they haven't sent details of this loan or is the ball in Idem hands now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the loan was active within the last 6yrs they must hold the info

and are not allowed to simply fob you off to the debt buyer or their dog

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx, just called RBS who will now have to call RBS.

 

I asked for the date of the sale of the debt and any paperwork relating to it.

 

I also asked why my prev correspondence of a lump sum offer in full and final settlement letter (for over 50% of balance) and their rejection letter was not included. Thought this SAR was to detail everything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update, RBS Customer Services in Leicester have sent me a letter apologising that their SAR Team in Edinburgh have not been able to find any details relating to the sale of the debt, nor can they find correspondence relating to my offer of full and final settlement and their subsequent rejection letter.

 

They have sent me a booklet on how to complain to the Financial Ombudsman but not sure what this would achieve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it does appear you have been paying all and sundry, it's about time you stopped doing so until all the requests are complied with. If they were going to take you to Court they would have done so already, so why are you still paying?

 

 

Make an official complaint to the OC let them take the 56 days then escalate this to the FOS/FCA in the meantime save your money and bank it... Its a debt that is not a priority one and you can drop it to £1-00pm ... Most of all DEMAND a final resolution letter from the OC once the procedure is complete...

 

 

You may want to read up on the CONC rules and read them fully see here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?423-Consumer-Credit-Sourcebook-%28Conc-FCA-rules%29

 

 

The full handbook can be found here https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/CONC/

Edited by mikeymack2002
Added a link

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just skimmed this thread, i notice that you have recieved a copy of the agreement.

 

Was this after your request made under section 77 of the CCA and payment of the fee ?

 

Was this a reconstructed copy or was it a copy of the signed document ?

 

This is quite an old fixed sum agreement from what I gather , has anyone taken a look at it regarding enforceability under section 127 ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mikey/Dodge

 

Yes I paid Ardern to see my CCA and it looks totally legit, a photocopy with def my signature. A few weeks later though I received the letter that Idem were now the DCA- is this a coincidence?

 

Wonder if the reason RBS cannot find my correspondence under SAR is because it went to the DCA?

 

Recent correspondence from Idem has stopped saying Re:Lombard and now says RE:Acct Number xxxxx- again not sure if relevant but thought Id mention. Hidden away in the last letter was text saying that Idem First Finance were the DCA and not Idem Servicing. again not sure if relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mikey/Dodge

 

Yes I paid Ardern to see my CCA and it looks totally legit, a photocopy with def my signature. A few weeks later though I received the letter that Idem were now the DCA- is this a coincidence?

 

Wonder if the reason RBS cannot find my correspondence under SAR is because it went to the DCA?

 

Recent correspondence from Idem has stopped saying Re:Lombard and now says RE:Acct Number xxxxx- again not sure if relevant but thought Id mention. Hidden away in the last letter was text saying that Idem First Finance were the DCA and not Idem Servicing. again not sure if relevant.

 

You need to check it for prescribed term presence and accuracy, sorry if you have already.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...