Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Newday AQUA CC Debt sold to robbersway whilst in dispute- wont return it to OC


newcomps
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3161 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, newbie here needing advice before possible court action.

 

I was in dispute with Aqua over charges applied after they closed the account and my account was being managed by their dispute team.

However, Aqua sold the debt refusing to accept my dispute.

 

I had been getting hassling calls from DCA and kept asking them to return the account to Aqua.

Eventually after about 5 calls in 2 months i sent them a Cease and Desist email

(I know it should be by mail but they confirmed receipt of the email and later in writing.)

 

 

They have since just sent me copies of statements showing the balance being claimed matched the last statement.

Conveniently they had no record of the dispute with Aqua.

 

I dont dispute all the debt and offered them same as I offered Aqua (750 of a 1000 balance - the extra being i believe unenforceable charges

--In brief they've closed the account because they withdrew the product from all customers apparently.

 

 

I have a letter showing this and sent it to DCA.

At that time Aqua should have closed the account (to confuse matters Aqua never actually closed the account when they said in writing they would)

but had they done it,

 

 

i no longer had a line of credit and my argument is you cant charge overlimit fees once the limit is removed by closing the account.

I refused to pay them anything all the time they continued to charge me these fees, hoping common sense would prevail :|

 

I suggested to DCA they have 3 options

- return to Aqua,

accept my offer which is still probably double what they paid for it

or take me to court..

 

 

NB Till now, they have not yet sent me a copy of the original CCA so i suspect they are unlikely to go to court without it.

 

Just to add all the comms between me and Aqua were via their secure email as part of my account

and i attempted to get a copy of those mails and Aqua claim they are no longer available

so evidence of the exchanges cant be found.

 

Hence i am looking for general guidance about :

 

1) Can a CC sell an account in dispute?

 

2) Can a DCA refuse to return an account in dispute with the original CC

 

3) As part of the C&D letter I told them I would start charging for my time if they contact me further unless its to accept one of the three options

- i wont physically invoice them but presumably can keep a record and if it goes to court and i win ,deduct it from my settlement?

 

4) Any thoughts on my statement that once a CC account is closed by pure reason of them no longer offering the service,

can they charge overlimit fees still (and interest on that overlimit fees) when i no longer have a limit.

Surely it now just a debt which needs to be repaid?

 

Thanks for your attention...

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this Halifax or newday?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.yes

2.yes

3. sound freeman of the land to me..better forgotten.

 

 

4. once the agreement is terminated, no they cant

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no AQUA.. DCA moved from HPh2 ( never heard of them) to RobinsonWay

 

 

aqua is newday

 

 

hoist portfolio holdings2 2 is robbersway.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boy you are quick..Thanks..

 

 

..So since my dispute all relates to those incorrect charges,

if DCA refuses my offer,

I should hold my nerve and be prepared to go to court?

 

 

My only doubt is that Aqua seem to have been selective in the information passed onto robbersway

and without concrete proof due to using their (Aquas) internal secure mail, have little chance of getting the proof.

 

I was considering a SAR.

Whether that would result in these "missing" comms between us coming to light i dont know.

.I think for now that having had the reassurance that you agree these extra charges are INvalid,

 

 

I'll see what robbersway come back with

-they are already late with producing the CCA but at least they are not hassling me further since the C&D letter.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you take this card out?

 

 

pers I'd not be needlessly entering into letter tennis with a power less DCA

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi not sure exactly of date but it was after 2007 - i believe it can make a difference if before then?

 

Dont get your last comment about letter tennis..I accept part of the debt but have only agreed to pay the DCA if they confirm the amount i am willing to pay would be full and final. I was actually amazed by the honesty of the last person i spoke to who said that if i only paid that amount they would still chase me for these rest.

 

So are you suggesting if they wont return the debt to Aqua , nor accept my offer to just hold my nerve and formally refuse to pay to force their hand?

Link to post
Share on other sites

your speaking to a DCA on the phone!!

 

 

that's a very big no no

never ever discuss your debts over the phone

 

 

they threaten and promise anything they can because theres no record of it

simply to get money out of you

 

 

as I said before

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and they have NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

 

regardless to IF you owe anything or not.

 

 

its worthy to always go thru certain stages if your debt has been sold to a DCA

 

 

the first of those is to send them a CCA request.

 

 

if the OC has sold the debt

it's near on understood that there must be something fishy with the debt

 

 

find out why by sending the OC an SAR.

 

 

as you've a pretty good idea this is penalty charges related pers I'd get reclaiming against the OC..

 

 

I certainly would not be looking at an F&F until those boxes are ticked

 

 

and if you've already got a default

its there for 6yrs regardless to whatever you do.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...