Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nuisance callers 'The Hearing Clinic' fined £220,000


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A claims company has become the first to be fined under new powers after making millions of "nuisance calls", the government has announced.

 

The Hearing Clinic, based in Derby, has been fined £220,000 following hundreds of complaints about speculative calls regarding hearing loss claims.

 

It was the first fine issued by the Claims Management Regulator.

 

Many of those called by the business had subscribed to the Telephone Preference Service (TPS), indicating that they did not want to receive unsolicited calls.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33788527

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Many of these cold calls come from call centres outside of the UK via recorded messaging, most often injury claims or mis-sold PPI claim companies. Any outgoing calls are redirected to the same call centre. Since they are not located within the UK, they don't fall under UK law. This is how many companies have got around the TPS list.

 

The only ones responsible for it are the companies who are employing the call centres. It takes a long time to get through to a real person instead of an automated reply if you call back to find out who the company is that is making these calls and can cost quite a bit on your phone bill. Without that information, you can't make a complaint. This really needs to be changed so that all overseas calls have to display a caller ID or they do not get through to UK numbers. Also, that caller ID must be specifically linked to the UK company selling the services.

 

We had a mobile phone at work for internal work use between the main office and the guys on the site. It was being called at a rate of sometimes twice a day with PPI claim services and always with an automated voice, no incoming number displayed though. It became such a nuisance due to disturbing the guys while they were trying to work that we had to get rid of the SIM and get another number for it. The number was even registered with TPS but it made no difference at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news that the Hearing Centre have been fined, I used to get several calls a week from various numbers and was sick of their unwanted attention. I'm TPS registered and ex directory.

 

I've recently highlighted another pest to my MP, who is actively campaigning against cold callers. Next Step Money are using a series of Hull numbers starting 01482 359. I've blocked about half a dozen on my phone already and tried to report them. The majority of calls are silent, if you pick up there's nobody on the other end. That's if you're quick enough to pick up as the call often terminates after 3-4 rings.

 

TPS don't want to know as I don't actually get to speak to anyone. I've been sent a copy of a letter form the ICO to my MP, regarding this matter. It goes over registering with TPS ansd how the ICO cna impose fines but then there's a sentenece which reads "I note that a number of calls Mr H is receiving are silent calls. We and the TPS cannot persue a complaint about silent calls under the PECR as no marketing is transmitted in such calls." Which is pretty useless really.

 

I'm then pointed at my service provider to establish if calls are being made by an individual or an organisation so they can take action - I'm with Virgin Media and they'll do nothing of the sort. I'm not even going to waste my time calling their wonderful script-monkeys.

 

Finally, I'm referred to Ofcom, who say they can only log information and take action if there are a large number of complaints. I've reported the numbers that way, but because this company keep changing number the number of complaints won't get high enough for Ofcom to act either.

 

I can block up to 30 numbers on my Panasonic phones, all 30 slots are taken...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news that the Hearing Centre have been fined, I used to get several calls a week from various numbers and was sick of their unwanted attention. I'm TPS registered and ex directory.

 

 

 

I've recently highlighted another pest to my MP, who is actively campaigning against cold callers. Next Step Money are using a series of Hull numbers starting 01482 359. I've blocked about half a dozen on my phone already and tried to report them. The majority of calls are silent, if you pick up there's nobody on the other end. That's if you're quick enough to pick up as the call often terminates after 3-4 rings.

 

TPS don't want to know as I don't actually get to speak to anyone. I've been sent a copy of a letter form the ICO to my MP, regarding this matter. It goes over registering with TPS ansd how the ICO cna impose fines but then there's a sentenece which reads "I note that a number of calls Mr H is receiving are silent calls. We and the TPS cannot persue a complaint about silent calls under the PECR as no marketing is transmitted in such calls." Which is pretty useless really.

 

I'm then pointed at my service provider to establish if calls are being made by an individual or an organisation so they can take action - I'm with Virgin Media and they'll do nothing of the sort. I'm not even going to waste my time calling their wonderful script-monkeys.

 

Finally, I'm referred to Ofcom, who say they can only log information and take action if there are a large number of complaints. I've reported the numbers that way, but because this company keep changing number the number of complaints won't get high enough for Ofcom to act either.

 

I can block up to 30 numbers on my Panasonic phones, all 30 slots are taken...

 

If you look at your network supplier they should be able to provide a 'block last caller' service or block a number type service. With TalkTalk once registered and it's free, you only have to dial 17258 ** which blocks the last number and it's unlimited number of blocks hope that helps, they are a real pain. Network providers should also provide a block all withheld numbers for free too

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at your network supplier they should be able to provide a 'block last caller' service or block a number type service. With TalkTalk once registered and it's free, you only have to dial 17258 ** which blocks the last number and it's unlimited number of blocks hope that helps, they are a real pain. Network providers should also provide a block all withheld numbers for free too

Sadly, Virgin Media don't offer anything like that, except to suggest buying phones that block calls... I can't block withheld numbers as I get frequent calls from the hospital, who withhold their number...

 

Regardless of the provider providing blocking, or doing it myself, these calls are a pest and the company making them needs sorting out...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...