Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FINAL UPDATE.  I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread.  An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.   I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.   for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.   I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Thanks again.  
    • I'm not sure what the "appeal" system asked but he said he definitely didn't indicate he was the driver so I'm just going to have to take his word for it. Honestly, I don't think the hirer will contact them. I think my brother will tolerate it. I did have a similar experience with another company 6-7 years ago and sought advice on here then to which you guys told me to ignore, I got the exact same DRP letters and then a "Gladstones Solicitor" letter.  After that nothing happened and it died away. Based on my experience with that I assumed the same would happen here but only asked to see if perhaps anything had changed since then.    Hopefully it doesn't get to court but if it did, I feel like we have enough evidence to sway a judge who probably hates dealing with this type of nonsense anyway. Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 
    • Your attachment showing the cinema parking restrictions seems crystal clear. Let's see what the photos turn up.
    • Meter certification periods re given in The Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, Schedule 4. From there you can check if they are correct about your specific meter .. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1566/schedule/4 If they're telling porkies then you have e clear grounds to tell them to take  hike. If they're correct or if you haven't been able to confirm then you have  few options. You could just keep fobbing them off. In general Octopus can't keep up with demand for smart meters. It took 9 months to get our. So they may not push too hard. Or ask if you can install your own choice of meter. The Electricity Act 1989 cover this in Schedule 7 (2) and (2A) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/7 Or fight the them and their enforcement. Or go off supply.
    • We received a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire (N181) from the solicitors along with a draft copy of their directions. I am on a course today so can upload over the weekend if needed. By 4pm on 16th May both parties must each give standard disclosure of documents by way of list by category. By 4pm on 30th May any request for inspection or copies of docs must be made and compiled 14 days thereafter. I will provide more over the weekend.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can a debt be passed to a DCA without a default ?


BobbiB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am currently on a DMP and trying to clean up my credit file.

 

 

I have plans to do CCA / SAR requests later as I need to establish current balances and total charges and interest

but first things first I want to clean up my credit file.

 

 

I currently have one account showing on my file as Arrangement to pay.

I know they should have marked me as defaulted in line with ICO guidelines 6 months into my DMP

but I have been told on the phone they don't need to follow ICO guidelines.

I have now put in a written complaint and am waiting for a response.

 

 

While waiting I have done a lot of research and am now thinking they might actually have breached the Consumer Credit Act

as section 87 states that service of a default notice is necessary before the creditor can become entitled,

by reason of any breach by the debtor of a regulated agreement (a) terminate the agreement.

 

 

5 years into my DMP the original creditor passed my debt to a collection agency who are have continued to record AP markers rather than default me.

 

 

Am I right to believe that by law they should have defaulted me before passing the debt to a DCA ?

Does it makes difference if they sold the debt or if the DCA are acting on behalf of the OC ?

I am not sure which applies in my situation.

 

 

If they have broke the law according to the CCA how do I go about rectifying this

- do I need a solicitor and to take them to court ?

 

 

Thanks for any advice as I can't find anything online about this just the CCA itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

First of all, if a DCA is collecting 'on behalf' of the creditor then the original creditor still owns the account so no default is required. It is only when a debt is sold to a DCA that a default should be placed before sale.

 

Regarding the arrangement. 'IF' you are paying an agreed amount which is higher than a token payment then an ARP is sufficient for the CRAs and there is no requirement to default if they choose not to.

 

If you are paying a token amount (as little as £1 per month) then a default should be automatically placed.

 

More info

 

http://www.scoronline.co.uk/sites/default/files/high_level_prinicples_document_final.pdf

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can use a DCA when they want.

 

Did you ever get a default notice ? Can you make the payments required under the terms of the account or do you need a reduced payment arrangement ? If they originally defaulted you, they should have issued notice and then when you came to a reduced payment arrangement, noted your CRA record. If your CRA record is not accurate, then complain to the Data Protection officer of the Bank concerned and if they don't rectify, complain to the CRA. If neither Bank or CRA correct the record, you can go to the FOS.

 

When did you take out this credit account ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see I need to find out if the debt was sold - fingers crossed it was !

 

 

My payments have always been less than 1% of the original balance so I would class that as a token payment personally.

 

 

I have read the guidelines linked but see they was published in 2014.

I started my DMP in 2003 so not sure if the guidelines are retrospective.

I understood that other guidelines were in place at that time.

 

I can't recall ever receiving a default notice from them but didn't open all my post at that time.

 

 

I joined Stepchange to make the letters stop.

And because I could not afford to continue the contractual payments on my debts due to divorce and the resulting chaos.

I think I first got the credit card in 2000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot see any issue here. Not sure how it helps you ?

 

Guidelines should be followed, if they are required to follow them by regulators. So does not matter when the DMP was agreed.

 

Speak to Stepchange again. Time for a review ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the DCA are reporting the debt does that mean they own it i.e. they bought it from the OC ?

The issue is I want them to add a backdated default to this account and if they won't do it under ICO guidelines I want them to do not under CCA. Spoke to Stepchange and they was not much help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have had notice of assignment from either the original creditor or DCA. They then take over the account and responsibility for CRA record.

 

CRA record should be the owner, so yes it looks like it was sold. Ask DCA for proof of assignment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just spoke with the DCA and they confirmed that they own the account and it has never had a default notice issued on it.

They was very helpful.

 

 

Am I correct therefore that the OC broke the law (section 87 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974) when they sold my debt without issuing a default ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Consumer debts can be sold that are not in default. There will be other laws that cover this. It happens all of the time, but they should have wriitten to you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt is an asset the same as any other. Law of property act 1925. Plus parts of others acts as they are relevant to financial matters.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like I need to consult a lawyer as this is all getting a bit beyond me. If silverfox1961 is reading I would appreciate your opinion on this. When you wrote that if a debt is sold to a DCA a default should be placed before sale did you mean should morally or legally ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there no legal remit at all to default a debt before sale

you really need to stop phoning fleecing DCA's too

 

 

they'll tell you any ole rubbish to keep you paying.

 

 

your target here is the original creditor..who is?

 

 

you write to them nicely and ask them why they did not register a default after your third missed/short payment.

 

 

you have been faithfully paying the debt

and feel that their actions have not helped you improve your outlook.

also I assume other creditors did default you and they've gone off the file now

so this OC is being very unfair to you.

 

 

the fact that on your credit file the debt is named with a DCA proves it was sold on.

 

 

I also question your wisdom upon not firing off CCA/SAR request to whom you pay and whom the OC was respectively

 

 

 

 

the results of those could change your whole bargaining outlook.

 

 

list your debts please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should question my stress levels not my wisdom :) I have a young baby and am not ready to go down the CCA / SAR route at the moment as I need to deal with one thing at a time or my stress levels will go through the roof. I am just focusing on this issue at the moment.

 

Wondering why we have the CCA if section 87 is not a legal remit ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my original post I refer to this:

 

Section 87

Need for default notice.

 

(1)Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice ”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

(a)to terminate the agreement, or

(b)to demand earlier payment of any sum, or

©to recover possession of any goods or land, or

(d)to treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred, or

(e)to enforce any security.

 

My point is they terminated the agreement when they sold the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my original post I refer to this:

 

Section 87

Need for default notice.

 

(1)Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice ”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

(a)to terminate the agreement, or

(b)to demand earlier payment of any sum, or

©to recover possession of any goods or land, or

(d)to treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred, or

(e)to enforce any security.

 

My point is they terminated the agreement when they sold the debt.

 

They did not terminate the agreement. If you follow that argument then all loans, credit cards etc which are transferred to another Bank are automatically terminated when there is a change to the owner of the Bank. When the Banks went bust in 07/08 and were taken over, all the existing credit accounts still existed.

 

Your debt would have been sold as a non performing asset, as they were not receiving the payments due. The agreement still exists and will be administered by the DCA.

 

Section 87 above says creditor or owner. So the DCA can issue a default notice as they are the owner, taking the place of the original Bank.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My point is they terminated the agreement when they sold the debt.

 

 

did they?

 

 

I'm not sure where why you are worrying about all this stuff..

to what end?

your stress levels...

 

 

seems like to me you might be reading a few other sites that beef up silly bravado on/importance

on these things when there is not really anything there in the first place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmmm ! Seen conflicting advice on this site, ICO guidance, Stepchange website and Compact Law website. Think it is time I contacted a solicitor as I am totally confused now. Was hoping to avoid having to pay out to fight this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry the rest of your message just appeared. My point is that i am questioning if the OC have terminated their agreement with me as they sold on the debt to a DCA. If they have I believe they should have issued a default before doing so. You ask to what end. I want a backdated default. The continuing AP markers are causing considerable stress as they will prevent me moving forward in my life for a lot longer than a backdated default would.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...