Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Should I F&F a HBOS debt through the OC or DCA or Just carry on regardless?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

this is my first post, although I have been loitering around the CAG forums for a long time, such a wealth of great advice and knowledge.

 

this is my situation;

 

I took out a loan of £12k with Bank of Scotland in 2008,

I was happily paying the monthly payment until 2010 when a 50% pay cut at work followed by a split from my partner left me in dire straights.

 

I sought advice from CCCS,

did a budget sheet,

got the interest frozen etc.

and reduced my payments to a token payment of £1 per month, which I have been paying since.

 

Currently the details are as follows;

 

Account start date 16/09/2008

Opening balance £ 10,994

Regular payment £ 139

Repayment frequency Monthly

Date of default 30/11/2010

Default balance £ 9,657

 

The token payment is made via Moorcroft (these were originally chasing me when i first defaulted but have been quiet since).

 

However, I receive my annual statement from Bank of Scotland.

 

I have recently received some inheritance (approx £5k)

naturally thought i would put this towards clearing my debt with a F&F offer, as it is my debt after all.

 

After making a few phone calls to HBOS and Moorcroft, it turns out Bank of Scotland still own the debt and Moorcroft are purely acting on their behalf.

 

Going on the above default date, it should in theory drop off my file 1st December 2016 (I have heard stories of creditors changing default dates??).

 

is it worth making a F&F settlement offer?

if so do I send this direct to Bank of Scotland?

Or

do I just ignore everything and wait for the default to disappear from my credit file?

 

I am asking as I currently private rent and would hope to one day in the next 5 years or so look to get a mortgage.

 

The default has also made it incredibly difficult to obtain any kind of credit such as mobile phone, car lease etc.

 

I have reclaimed all charges / PPI already.

The only thing I have not done yet is CCA,

is this worth doing if the debt is still owned by the original creditor?

 

Apologies for the war and peace effort!

 

I have worked incredibly hard over the past 5 years to clear any other debts and get my self financially stable,

this is the last hurdle!

 

Any advice would be massively appreciated!

 

Skank

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the bottom line is it wont help your credit rating sadly

that's shot till the date the default and ofcourse the whole account drops off as you've indicated.

 

 

what is owing today?

do you get statements to confirm?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the bottom line is it wont help your credit rating sadly

that's shot till the date the default and ofcourse the whole account drops off as you've indicated.

 

 

what is owing today?

do you get statements to confirm?

 

 

dx

 

Thanks for the reply DX,

 

I get a quarterly statement, the details above are from Noddle.

 

 

The balance as of today is £9657, I could probably raise about 6.5k for a settlement.

 

 

I just want to try and clean my CRA as best as I possibly can to allow me to recover.

The way the default has and is still affecting me I wish I had just gone bankrupt and not wasted my money paying anything back,

i would've been in exactly the same situation as I am now but with an extra 7k in my pocket.

 

 

I know I shouldn't think like this but I thought I was coming out of the other side after really struggling for 4 years to get back on my feet.

 

 

I got knocked back for some basic credit yesterday, which was soul destroying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rather than via the phone

have you formerly written to HBOS seeking settlement?

 

 

are there any relevant circumstances like ill health etc to use as a lever

and also don't forget as they've accepted your reduced payment for a good while

you can harp on about your continued lack of income and that the future holds no better outlook

 

 

there are F&F letters in the library.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...