Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander - CCA question


camillamagnum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

"I sent a CCA request to Santander re an old alliance and leicester loan taken out in 2005.

 

 

They sent me info saying:

Please find enclosed a copy of the executed loan agreement and Terms and Conditions as requested.

 

 

Under the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983

we can comply with the legal requirements by sending you a copy of an agreement in the same form as the one that was signed,

but excluding the signature box, customer signature and the date of signature."

 

However, when I look through the papers I can see on page 2 of 6 that there is a signature box with my signature and date.

 

 

There's also a direct debit form signed by me.

 

 

So why then do they say it excludes the signature box,

 

 

signature and the date of signature?

 

I dont understand.

 

Any help please in making sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

I have moved your thread to the correct forum so people can help you.

 

regards

 

SS

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

standard templated reply, in addition to your agreement they should have enclosed the t&cs at inception and a simple statement of ac

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so this is still with satans bank and not sold on to a dCA?

 

 

is it already paid off?

 

 

why did you sent the CCA request?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

I'm not sure if they've supplied everything they should have or not.

 

 

What they have sent is 7 pages - one of which is the direct debit mandate I signed

- then there is the fixed sum loan agreement with key financial information re my loan, no of payments , total amount payable.

Then there's the t and c then a declaration ie use of my information etc.

 

 

I've been making token of £1 per month for years,

but I guess they have enough there to take me to court if I dont...

 

 

... I recently CCAd 2 MBNA credit cards that were with dcas and it turned out they were unenforceable

 

 

so I'm now trying to find out which debts have the paperwork and which dont!

 

 

I suppose as they havent passed this debt on to anyone else it's still legit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if its still with satans bank

I'd p'haps not stop paying them just yet

 

 

have you ever sent an sar to get all the statement

 

 

a loan from 2005 which is still running smells to me.

 

 

how much was the loan for in total cost to you

and how much have you paid them in total?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post up what they sent minus pers details

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I originally took out the loan of £10,153.67 in 2005, with total amount payable of £12,662.40 over 60 months. (No PPI). I now owe around £4,806.

 

I dont have a scanner but I could go to the Post Office tomorrow and get it scanned if you think it could help to have further info?

Link to post
Share on other sites

by posting up we can check that all is in order

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a digital camera? mobile phone?

 

 

use that.

 

 

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On this doc

there was my personal loan account number

my name and address on page 1 (which I deleted from copy).

 

 

My signature and date of signature was on page 2.

 

 

My personal loan account number was on page 3 and page 5.

 

 

They also included a direct debit mandate signed and dated by me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's not a cca its an application.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imo,provided they included a simple statement of account, what they have sent would satisfy a s77 request

 

There may be a s60/61 argument re application form, but I think you would on balance

 

have a hard time convincing a court

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you CAG for looking at this for me and for your opinions.

 

 

It's not really clear cut if it is an agreement or an application but at least you have been able to see what they sent me

and certainly they did not include a simple statement of account with the docs so actually they did not satisfy a s77 request

(though they do keep me updated regularly on this and have the information).

 

 

They said

 

 

"If you have any questions just give us a call".

 

 

Any ideas how to go forward with this one please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For now I would continue with your token payment and send a full SAR for all the info

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Researching other cases of applications forms being sent instead of agreements -

I've read that yes, it does comply with s.78 & s.127(3)

-BUT it does not comply with s.60(1)

meaning this agreement is only enforceable by court order under s.65 (CCA1974)....

 

 

.... I am in two minds as to how to go forward now.

 

 

I have the same problem with the Restons CCA application:

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?450598-Restons-HSBC-HFC&p=4780177#post4780177

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...