Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Likely Home Repossession - Nationwide


tezzaa61
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2429 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

 

Looking for some advice.

 

I've been unemployed for 15 months. I have had an arrangement in place with Nationwide to just

pay the interest on my mortgage, for about 8 months or so. Normally every 3 months they extend the arrangement for another 3 months after getting me to go through my income/expenditure.

 

Last time they only extended it for 2 months as I was unfortunate to speak to a stroppy adviser

on the mortgage team. She said it can't be extended indefinitely and I would need to call again in August.

 

I've a couple of weeks temp work coming up and the two questions I have are:

 

Could I not just switch my mortgage to Interest-Only, I'm currently on a standard variable rate of 2.54 %. I briefly spoke to someone on the desk at my Nationwide local branch, and he said to do that I would need to take out an endowment policy as I do not have 150K equity in the house.

My significant other, who has her own house, went Interest-Only about a year and a half ago, and she was not required to take out an Endowment Policy at her Mortgage Provider. Is that requirement set-in stone somewhere, or does it vary from bank to bank Is it worth me talking to a mortgage adviser at the Nationwide. I'm not in a position to afford a policy.

 

My second question is with regard to Mortgage Interest Relief (MIR) that the DWP pay.

If I work for 2-3 weeks, when the temp work is over, I was told I could do a Rapid Re-claim for

JSA and that my claim for MIR would also be linked to the re-claim and I would continue to get

it. Is that the case?

 

Any advice would be most appreciated.

 

Cheers

 

Tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I will flag this for site team for you.

 

The ST members who would be able to advise on this have day jobs so wont be around until later this evening.

 

So dont think you are being ignored :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nationwide require a repayment vehicle for interest only mortgages, as does every other lender now. They will accept the following as -

will accept the following repayment vehicles:

 

  • stocks and shares ISA including one previously known as a PEP
  • endowment policy
  • pension plan
  • sale of second property- Must have 120% equity of your loan in a second property, you need to be on the deeds for this
  • sale of main residence- Again you need a huge amount of equity
  • UK FTSE listed securities
  • unit and investment trusts
  • capital from Trust funds
  • Premium Bonds
  • sale of foreign holiday home - From what I can gather they have never asked for any evidence of this.

what is your home realistically worth and how much do you owe on the current mortgage ? Unfortunately this is the time when an MPPI or a PPI plan would be useful to you . I would suggest going to the local branch and asking if there is anything they can do to help you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will flag this for site team for you.

 

The ST members who would be able to advise on this have day jobs so wont be around until later this evening.

 

So dont think you are being ignored :)

 

OK, thanks for that :-)

 

Nationwide require a repayment vehicle for interest only mortgages, as does every other lender now. They will accept the following as -

will accept the following repayment vehicles:

 

 

  • stocks and shares ISA including one previously known as a PEP
  • endowment policy
  • pension plan
  • sale of second property- Must have 120% equity of your loan in a second property, you need to be on the deeds for this
  • sale of main residence- Again you need a huge amount of equity
  • UK FTSE listed securities
  • unit and investment trusts
  • capital from Trust funds
  • Premium Bonds
  • sale of foreign holiday home - From what I can gather they have never asked for any evidence of this.

what is your home realistically worth and how much do you owe on the current mortgage ? Unfortunately this is the time when an MPPI or a PPI plan would be useful to you . I would suggest going to the local branch and asking if there is anything they can do to help you

 

Thanks for your reply :-)

 

I've only about 19K equity in the property and none of the repayment vehicles above. I'll arrange an appointment with a mortgage adviser at the local branch to discuss my circumstances.

 

I've just about managed so far, but if they will not extend the payment arrangement again, I'll be in serious difficulty.

 

Cheers

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have to leave the mortgage questions for others, but regarding your MIR with your benefit then yes, if you do a rapid reclaim following a short period of employment then your new claim will be linked to the old one. In effect, it will be treated as not really a new claim at all. So if you were entitled to MIR before then that will continue.

 

If you need to speak to the DWP about MIR, you should ask for a callback from a member of the Mortgages team - it's a specialist area within the department and most staff aren't trained to answer queries on the subject.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have to leave the mortgage questions for others, but regarding your MIR with your benefit then yes, if you do a rapid reclaim following a short period of employment then your new claim will be linked to the old one. In effect, it will be treated as not really a new claim at all. So if you were entitled to MIR before then that will continue.

 

If you need to speak to the DWP about MIR, you should ask for a callback from a member of the Mortgages team - it's a specialist area within the department and most staff aren't trained to answer queries on the subject.

 

Thanks for your reply. That's all very helpful to know.

 

One more thing; what is the cut off point for a rapid reclaim?

 

Regards

 

Tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually lenders suggest you have a repayment vehicle in place if you take out an interest only mortgage - but I've not heard of them insisting on it. However they are usually satisfied if you tell them you intend to sell the house at the end of the term to repay the mortgage.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. That's all very helpful to know.

 

One more thing; what is the cut off point for a rapid reclaim?

 

Regards

 

Tez

 

Any claim within 26 weeks of the end of your last claim will be an RR, provided your circumstances have not changed. But even if you're not able to make an RR, the new claim would still be treated as "linked" to the old claim for, I think, 52 weeks. As such, your entitlement to MIR would be on the same terms as before.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any claim within 26 weeks of the end of your last claim will be an RR, provided your circumstances have not changed. But even if you're not able to make an RR, the new claim would still be treated as "linked" to the old claim for, I think, 52 weeks. As such, your entitlement to MIR would be on the same terms as before.

 

OK, that's great to hear.

 

Thank you so much for your help :-)

 

Tez

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hi Folks,

 

Looking for some advice.

 

I've been unemployed for 15 months. I have had an arrangement in place with Nationwide to just

pay the interest on my mortgage, for about 8 months or so. Normally every 3 months they extend the arrangement for another 3 months after getting me to go through my income/expenditure.

 

Last time they only extended it for 2 months as I was unfortunate to speak to a stroppy adviser

on the mortgage team. She said it can't be extended indefinitely and I would need to call again in August.

 

Cheers

 

Tez

 

Hi,

 

Update:

 

August was the last month the Nationwide agreed to me paying the interest only.

 

I have two questions:

 

When my payments go back to paying off the interest and the principle they would normally

go back to £254 per month and increase of £154 per month.

 

Will that amount now increase due to the fact that I have been paying £154 less every month for 18 months?

 

Also, would it be worth me asking them to re-capitalise the arrears. I've been two and

a half months in arrears for the period the payment plan has been in place. If they agree

to re-capitalise the arrears it may buy me 3 more months to try and get myself sorted.

 

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi,

 

I am having to sell my house as the Nationwide have taken me to court due to arrears.

 

I have had an offer on my house (which is ridiculously low) and the estate agent keeps asking me

if I have informed my mortgage lender about the offer.

 

Am I obliged to inform the Nationwide that an offer has been made on my property?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you give a bit more detail please i.e. are you in a position to pay a bit towards the arrears each month?

 

Would the offer you have clear the mortgage ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could the estate agent just be asking this to help you? Hopefully Nationwide would stop repo proceedings if you have a firm offer?

 

Hi, that could be why they are asking.

 

What I'm not sure about is whether or not I'm obliged to tell the mortgage company I have an offer, as basically it's far below what I think my property is worth and I'm holding out for a better offer.

 

Am I obliged to tell the mortgage company I have an offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know if the prospective buyer wants your property as a home or to rent out.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should write to the lender telling them you have put the house on the market - include a copy of the estate agent contract, that way if you have to defend court action you can show you are in the process of trying to clear the mortgage.

 

If you need help with a letter let me know.

 

What date is the court hearing for possession ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should write to the lender telling them you have put the house on the market - include a copy of the estate agent contract, that way if you have to defend court action you can show you are in the process of trying to clear the mortgage.

 

If you need help with a letter let me know.

 

What date is the court hearing for possession ?

 

Thanks for the reply :-)

 

The hearing is on 7 September.

 

The lender is aware the house is on the market.

 

I have been to court twice already and had it adjourned twice to give me time to either get it sold or there is a very small chance I may have my benefits increased pending appeals for ESA and PIP, but that is in no way guaranteed.

 

When I was last in court the judge said it wouldn't be adjourned again and he would be looking to grant re-possession to the lender. I had a 6 week adjournment this time because I stated that I should know the result of my appeals in 4 weeks and it was a mistake for me to say 4 weeks as its taking longer.

 

What no one has clarified for me is do I have to tell the lender an offer is on the table? The estate agent keeps asking me if I have told the lender, which I haven't - do I an obligation to tell the lender?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply :-)

 

The hearing is on 7 September.

 

The lender is aware the house is on the market.

 

I have been to court twice already and had it adjourned twice to give me time to either get it sold or there is a very small chance I may have my benefits increased pending appeals for ESA and PIP, but that is in no way guaranteed.

 

When I was last in court the judge said it wouldn't be adjourned again and he would be looking to grant re-possession to the lender. I had a 6 week adjournment this time because I stated that I should know the result of my appeals in 4 weeks and it was a mistake for me to say 4 weeks as its taking longer.

 

What no one has clarified for me is do I have to tell the lender an offer is on the table? The estate agent keeps asking me if I have told the lender, which I haven't - do I an obligation to tell the lender?

 

I wonder why the agent has told you this. I don't know the answer but unless you have something from the court or lender which confirms this I wonder about the agents reason for this. I have heard of unscrupulous agents who work with developers and property investors giving them the heads up when properties are likely to go cheap due to repossession or quick sales being required. I suspect if you tell NW they will want you to accept the offer. I would ask the agent to advise why they think you need to tell them. Seems to me you should be trying to negotiate a better offer. The agent works for the seller not the buyer so should want to get the best price for you.

 

Are there any similar properties on the market or recently sold that you can find to compare prices?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I wonder why the agent has told you this. I don't know the answer but unless you have something from the court or lender which confirms this I wonder about the agents reason for this. I have heard of unscrupulous agents who work with developers and property investors giving them the heads up when properties are likely to go cheap due to repossession or quick sales being required. I suspect if you tell NW they will want you to accept the offer. I would ask the agent to advise why they think you need to tell them. Seems to me you should be trying to negotiate a better offer. The agent works for the seller not the buyer so should want to get the best price for you.

 

Are there any similar properties on the market or recently sold that you can find to compare prices?

 

Sorry for late reply, didn't get a notification like I normally do!

 

The agent seems to be more on the side of the potential buyer. I have decided to terminate my Sole Agency Agreement with the current agent. I am now putting my house up for auction as I think I will get at least a price nearer to what I want, even though I know it will be far less than market value.

 

Last time I spoke to the agent to say I wanted to terminate my Sole Agency Agreement, he said I would have to pay him the £99 + VAT for the EPC they did for me before they will take it off the market.

 

Their Terms and Conditions state I have to give 28 Days Notice in writing to terminate the Agreement. I have to get that to them today to get it in the Auction in a months time, or I'll be liable to pay them a fee if it's sold.

 

Are they right when they say they will not take it off the market till I have paid for the EPC? Even if I give them 28 Days Notice today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I 'm with caro on this.

Your "Estate Agent" has a "client" in mind.

Read the "Terms and conditions" on the contract you signed with regards to the EPC.

 

You may be better off marketing it with another agent or agents rather that going to auction. ...

 

Your going too have to move fast though.

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I decided to reluctantly accept the offer for my property and I attended court on Monday 7th Sept.

The judge granted repossession of my property to the lender after 56 days.

 

Since the court appearance I've had an estate agent value my property to see what I could rent it out for. She says she could get me a tenant and the rental income would more than cover the mortgage.

 

Is it worth asking the lender to consider this option at this late stage or are they likely to just point blank refuse?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi,

 

The bailiffs are coming to re-possess my home next Tuesday.

 

I owe £58,000 on the mortgage and the house is worth roughly at least £74,000.

 

Someone that offered to buy it awhile back may be interested in buying it from me but only for £64,000.

 

If I just let the bank re-possess it, are they allowed to sell it for less than £64,000? I did read somewhere that they have to sell it for a reasonable price around about the market price.

 

I also have someone that would rent it, but apparently, as I owe arrears, I couldn't rent it out until the arrears are paid.

Is that a legal requirement?

 

I'm just not sure of the best course of action.

 

Any advice will be really appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Terry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly we do see repossessed properties sold way below the market price.

 

 

I will alert site team for you, but you might not receive a response until later in the day - do please keep an eye on your thread for responses.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...