Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What would you say if you were spied on by a drone


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I can see drones falling foul of this at some point

 

"Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his correspondence", subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society""

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is when they start selling drones cheaply in shops that there will be a bigger problem. The ones that take cameras are fairly expensive at the moment. Not seen one locally being used.

 

Government may want to look at some form of licensing to put many people from buying and to control their usage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There already is legislation.

 

I fly Radio controlled combustion engine helicopters, and have dabbled in solid fuel Rockets for which i need a licence and insurance.

 

Sabresheep raises a good point as Google Earth came into conflict with their cameras on top of those smart cars with Article 8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one. Around £900 - £1000 spent on it so far, Has live video feeds as well as a GoPro recording HD footage.

 

As long as you have permission from the landowner where the "drone" was taken off from, and you stay 150m away from buildings or people, then you can fly one. You can film in public just the same as anyone else with a camera phone. If one films you in public, then there is nothing you can do about it.

 

Although you are suppose to tell people that it is filming and for what reason, I don't think that is law.

 

I've flown it at a few public parks and never had any complaints.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only film in the public domain. (Street, park etc) That does not mean looking into peoples back gardens or windows intentionally or unintentionally. Article 8 ECHR is the law on this matter as no Derogation exist. You also cannot fly above a certain height. (400) Even with the land owners permission you still need a licence, the same as fishing through the BMFA and insurance. Any reputable model aircraft hobbyist belongs to a registered club

 

It is covered under Article 166 Civil Aviation Act.

 

The operation of multirotors for sport and recreational purposes is covered by the same legal considerations as other model aircraft; the law makes no specific distinction on types of aircraft other than weight limits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can't film into peoples gardens or through windows, but you can film in public.

 

400ft / 120m is the height limit. The limit from buildings and people is actually 50m, not 150m as I had mentioned above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one too and trust me that even with HD footage, if the angle of view of the camera is over 90deg then the operator can't see you, you are a speck on his screen. FPV flight is about the immersive experience not snooping on neighbours sunbathing.

 

You can be seen with a telephoto lens but using one makes the footage very shaky (i.e: useless) even with a gimbal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is when they start selling drones cheaply in shops that there will be a bigger problem. The ones that take cameras are fairly expensive at the moment. Not seen one locally being used.

 

Government may want to look at some form of licensing to put many people from buying and to control their usage.

 

What about when someone straps some explosive and sends it over some sensitive target.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this is getting ridiculous,

 

What next

 

Ban Model Aircraft enthusiast because of Daily Mail rhetoric of what might happen??

 

Message to all, despite what the Daily Mail and their followers would have us believe

 

There are no Terrorists or Paedophiles hiding under every bed

 

We will be scared of our own shadow next or do you advocate "Night Watch"

 

 

 

Who next in line to be the new Joseph McCarthy???

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this is getting ridiculous,

 

What next

 

Ban Model Aircraft enthusiast because of Daily Mail rhetoric of what might happen??

 

Message to all, despite what the Daily Mail and their followers would have us believe

 

There are no Terrorists or Paedophiles hiding under every bed

 

We will be scared of our own shadow next or do you advocate "Night Watch"

 

 

 

Who next in line to be the new Joseph McCarthy???

 

 

 

So you actually believed that hoax front page, well I suppose someone had to ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...