Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What is the name of the window cleaning business? Have you taken photographs of the dirty windows et cetera?
    • i would suggest that you stick to researching on here only. use our search top right for say CTAX or liability order.   you seriously have some wild theories, but those are understandable.   as i have said, there won't be a court hearing you need nor would that help you at all nor are expected to attend, it's not like that, it's merely a rubberstamp exercise .   there is no right of forced entry for bailiffs collecting CTAX debts. the bailiff process is one of a letter which will be entitled Notice of enforcement, this gives you 7 days to pay the sum it outlines with an associated fee of £75 for it being sent. the 2nd step will be a visit, you have no legal remit to engage with them at all, i i would not do so under any circumstances, that visit will add a further £235 fee those are the only things a bailiff can do. the most they can charge is a total of £310.   police do not ever get involved in civil matters like CTAX debt. not sure where you ever got that idea from.   its saturday now so use the W/end wisely, get reading up HERE ONLY it might well pay you on monday to go RING the council CTAX dept and plead poverty etc etc. it might also pay you to find the email address or even better phone number of your local MP and get him involved. they can do wonders.   dx 
    • NPAP see here: VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC now Claimform - no stopping - London Southend Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 7 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group
    • Hi Stu and dx1000uk,   I have done the online assessment and as I suspected I already receive the maximum benefits available to me.   Yes I was referring to the fact that some times I know that non-payment of council tax can lead to imprisonment so thanks for clarifying.   let's say I can't make their demands for payment and they do send bailiffs in, I assume these are the type of bailiffs I can just not let in and then after a certain amount of attempts they give up right? does the council then not send the police round? This is what I can't work out and worries me.   The council already know that I am struggling and can't make the payments but when do I get my chance to tell a court or the police that it's not that I don't want to pay but that I can't pay?    Walshy
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Recourse - against medic who got things so wrong in the first place if an appeal scores dramat


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1815 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have not yet had to face this ordeal, but am reading a lot elsewhere about people who have, often failing initially and the decision being reversed on appeal.

 

My question is threefold:

 

1. Is there any recourse against the medic who got things so wrong in the first place if an appeal scores dramatically wrong?

 

2. Is the small claims court an option for claiming compensation for distress, costs of working on the appeal etc...?

 

3. What official complaints procedure exists?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this in connection with ESA, DLA or PIP, as there are some differences.

 

That said, the answer to your first two questions is basically no and the last is that there is an official complaints procedure but in my experience it is entirely pointless and all it will achieve is causing you more stress.

 

Edit : In connection with your first question, it is possible to complain to the relevant body (e.g. General Medical Council for a doctor) but I've not heard of anyone achieving anything as a result.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One is PIP, and one is DLA turning into PIP next year.

 

Why can these not be taken through the small claims court? I believe you when you say they can't, but always like to know where the information is sourced if you know off hand?

 

I'm guessing the complaints procedure is internal is it?

 

It seems so wrong that a doctor can award 2 points at interview, then on appeal 10 points are awarded. The doctor who made such a mess the first time should at least have his fee reclaimed, and I think a fine imposed. They might start to be more careful then and think more about the patient than the targets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The appointment at ATOS is taken by an untrained medical profession but by staff who are usually a simple trained secretary.

 

Citizens advice are very good with cracking down on a result towards misstreatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think here the correct question is not to look for proof you cannot use the small claims court, but instead to find the legislation and case law that says you can.

 

Simply put, i am not aware of any evidence to support the fact you can use Small Claims in this issue.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The appointment at ATOS is taken by an untrained medical profession but by staff who are usually a simple trained secretary.

 

Citizens advice are very good with cracking down on a result towards misstreatment.

 

Has that changed then? I thought they were healthcare professionals but not necessarily doctors. Atos does a training course of about 6 weeks, from memory.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of whether it is possible to sue ATOS/DWP, I think the issue with a court claim is what exactly you would claim for, and how you would prove it? If you were claiming negligence on the part of the healthcare professional, for example, how would you prove that some other professional may not have come up with exactly the same findings on that particular day? When decisions are overturned at tribunal, DWP tends to suggest that it's because of additional evidence that wasn't available during the initial assessment.

Furthermore, even if you did succeed in proving negligence, how would you go about proving that harm has been done and valuing that harm? Again an example - in my own case (an ESA claim) the independent adjudicator found that there had been an unreasonable delay (2 years) in carrying out the assessment, but since I was being paid maximum benefit throughout there was no harm done. Of course, anyone who has been through the ATOS merry-go-round knows that there has been incredible harm done regarding stress etc, but again it's almost impossible to prove the cause or the effect.

The bottom line is, as I said regarding complaints, the net result of any action is likely to be no consequence for the healthcare professional, ATOS or DWP and just further hassle and stress for the complainant.

 

The complaints procedure is internal to start with - ATOS and then DWP - but can then go to the Independent Adjudicator and (I think, I didn't go that far) ultimately to the Parliamentary Ombudsman.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot complain to the GMA unless the adviser was a registered Doctor. These people are what is known as "Health Care Professionals"

 

Any complaint has to go to their licensing governing body, That will be the Health Professions Council, Then as stated the Parliamentary ombudsman

 

In my case it was not ATOS with the DWP, but ATOS as Occupational Health service Providers

 

I was having real problems with my knees, ATOS sent a report to my employer that stated under no illusion i was faking it. A week later my ligament snapped. That was in 2009. I am now on crutches with progressive arthritis.

 

I will be blunt. Unless you can prove negligence to such an extent it adversely impacted on you health, you have no chance of redress. Been there, done that, got the T-Shirt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
HI thought they were healthcare professionals but not necessarily doctors.

 

From what I recall of the contracts, the individuals must be qualified healthcare professionals. But they are not necessarily qualified in the fields that they are assessing claimants on.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites

So say for a mental health issue the stress of being turned down had led to self harm and then being sectioned for a period in a secure psychiatric unit (this is total fabrication - it has not happened to me as I've not had to face ATOS or Maximus), the MH professionals always look for a trigger, in this case it would be documented as being rejected for PIP. Would this not count as unnecessary suffering with proof to back it up?

 

There's also the issue of them not being allowed to ask people in support groups to attend any work focused interviews. Is there not redress for them not making you aware of this fact before you went, and sending you a normal letter as opposed to one adapted to say you were being invited to attend, but did not have to? The letter sent actually mentions benefit sanctions I believe. Surely that must be actionable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My atos mess up was way back in 2009. A doctor conducted my assessment, basically she ticked her boxes saying NO for everything i said Yes to.....and totally found me fit and did not record anything correctly. Hence 0 points.

 

I did complain to the GMC about her. Unfortunately there was no proof ( any future medical assessments i want recorded). But they did write to me stating that if any other complaints about her were received they would further investigate her. Having said that they only keep this kind of complaint on record for (i think they said) 2 or 3 yrs.

 

It got me nowhere really from that point of view but i did feel some benefit from knowing that both her and atos were contacted by GMC and knew a complaint had been made. Had i been able to prove this i would have taken it as far as possible.

 

Almost 18 months later i won my tribunal........

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...
Guest Miss Anxious

Not that I know what I'm talking about, but there must be some recourse for the so called medical professional, who finds you with NIL points, then for the decision to be overturned, proves that he/she did not do her job properly?

 

I would be inclined to report that person, having put you through all the extra stress, and causing you to be sectioned?

 

Correct me if I'm wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...