Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Absolutely normal.  They do their best to waste your time and also the time of the courts. It doesn't cost them anything.  It costs you and it costs the taxpayer so what do they care?   These are all the reasons why you should not agree to mediation but insist on going to trial.  They will continue to waste your time right off until the trial date and then probably make you an offer.  At least then it won't be in confidence and you can tell them to go and do one if they don't offer you 100% of what you are claiming
    • No, but all you'd do is blindly run the statute barred date for another 18 months. Just sit on your hands until you get a letter of claim, then send a CCA request.  
    • A growing group of conscious consumers have found other strategies to keep companies honest.View the full article
    • Just like last time, Evri requested more time so they have another 2 weeks
    • Just an update, finance company rejected my complaint saying they've found damage but can't tell when it's from even though I've shown them how the front end is misaligned in the advert photos compared to another identical model car they're selling.  Dealership now want to charge me to get the car brought back to me but will only discuss over the phone which seems off. They're also saying no damaged was picked up by JLR main dealership before I purchased it but my local JLR dealerships till this day haven't mentioned the damage to me because they don't go into stuff like that for some reason lol  Ombudsman case is still open, not sure if I should leave the car with them or just pay to have it brought back.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Better than winning the lottery for Brighthouse


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3185 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A mum-of-six has hit out at a rent-to-own company after the cooker she bought from them broke down – and she had to wait four weeks for it to be fixed.

 

Tracy Stevenson, 40, of Briery Way, Adeyfield, Hemel Hempstead took out a payment plan for the new Beko induction cooker from Brighthouse in the town centre at £11.82 a week.

 

Over the next three years, the cooker – worth £666 – will set the family back £1,843.92, which is an APR representative of 69.9 per cent.

 

More ...

 

Just look at those rip-off interest rates. She paid £1,178 more than she needed, she could have taken her family on holiday or fed them steak with that.

 

Stop being proud and get your goods in a second-hand or charity shop and use that until you have saved up enough to buy a new one.

 

You can bet your life the boss of Brighthouse hasn't got a cheap Beko in his house and doesn't live on chicken nuggets.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a bit of honesty is needed with this.

 

Most of the clients probably have not got the educational knowledge to understand APR and what they will be paying back. They are probably on benefits and minimum wage as well. That is not an excuse to exploit them though

 

The average person who use this company are already credit blacklisted or fail to meet main stream lending criteria. The likes of companies such as BH exploit this. The same goes for Provident, Wonga, welcome finance etc

 

What is needed is legislation stopping any loan shark rates above say 50% APR %

Link to post
Share on other sites

All agreements show the cost of the item and the total amount to be paid, not enough attention is paid to that.

 

I agree legislation but education is also needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too many the thought of getting a new appliance or gadget now despite paying a high whack is more preferential than saving and/or the inability to get credit at reasonable rates.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A mum-of-six has hit out at a rent-to-own company after the cooker she bought from them broke down – and she had to wait four weeks for it to be fixed.

 

Tracy Stevenson, 40, of Briery Way, Adeyfield, Hemel Hempstead took out a payment plan for the new Beko induction cooker from Brighthouse in the town centre at £11.82 a week.

 

Over the next three years, the cooker – worth £666 – will set the family back £1,843.92, which is an APR representative of 69.9 per cent.

 

More ...

 

Just look at those rip-off interest rates. She paid £1,178 more than she needed, she could have taken her family on holiday or fed them steak with that.

 

Stop being proud and get your goods in a second-hand or charity shop and use that until you have saved up enough to buy a new one.

 

You can bet your life the boss of Brighthouse hasn't got a cheap Beko in his house and doesn't live on chicken nuggets.

 

Proud???? Have you ever been in a position where you cant afford a £1 for milk?

Ever not been able to put £5 gas in?

It's got edited all to do with being proud, its got to do with not having savings as living on the bread line, not having a normal credit line, not having friends and family to help out.

There is no way some of these families can afford £200 for a second hand cooker or even fifty pound to get a clapped out old rusty one.

That is a very silly out of touch comment by you there. Sometimes, all these families can do is take out a credit line with bright house or similar and just hope to make the weekly payments.

 

Yes, there are other ways, bit for some, the other way is just not an option. Sometimes its get sucked into bright house or go without.

Edited by Conniff
remove swearing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Proud???? Have you ever been in a position where you cant afford a £1 for milk?

Ever not been able to put £5 gas in?

It's got edited all to do with being proud, its got to do with not having savings as living on the bread line, not having a normal credit line, not having friends and family to help out.

There is no way some of these families can afford £200 for a second hand cooker or even fifty pound to get a clapped out old rusty one.

That is a very silly out of touch comment by you there. Sometimes, all these families can do is take out a credit line with bright house or similar and just hope to make the weekly payments.

 

Yes, there are other ways, bit for some, the other way is just not an option. Sometimes its get sucked into bright house or go without.

 

Do you think I am on this consumer help site because I'm a millionaire - get real, I've been there, done that and got the T-shirt, so climb down of your high horse.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I agree, to an extent, but as I have written in my last post, sometimes there is no other option.

 

I agree which was covered by "/or the inability to get credit at reasonable rates." :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think I am on this consumer help site because I'm a millionaire - get real, I've been there, done that and got the T-shirt, so climb down of your high horse.

 

What high horse? If you "have the tshirt", why do you assume that these folk can just go and buy a second hand cooker. I think you will find that is YOU on the high horse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree which was covered by "/or the inability to get credit at reasonable rates." :)

 

My point was that you say its just because they want, and they could save. They could save. They could save the £6 a week for 12 months and then go and by a cooker. But what do they do in the meantime? Sometimes there is NO option but to visit a legal loan shark like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks, chill... We have been down this route before... We have loads of threads on BAYV, Caversham Finance and PH...

The end of the story is that not enough is being done to explain to people why they shouldnt be using these companies.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully support the idea of increasing awareness of Credit Unions that might help people from falling victim to these loan sharks

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully support the idea of increasing awareness of Credit Unions that might help people from falling victim to these loan sharks

 

So what can we do to get the message across ?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what can we do to get the message across ?

 

Now that is a very good question. CAG has promoted the Credit Unions via the Newsletter - dedicated threads and on threads where people are complaining about these BAYV companies AND still people will not seek help from their credit unions. !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can't afford a pound for milk or 5 for gas, then you can't afford 12 per week finance. What's the point of having a cooker if you can't afford to buy anything to cook.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My point was that you say its just because they want, and they could save. They could save. They could save the £6 a week for 12 months and then go and by a cooker. But what do they do in the meantime? Sometimes there is NO option but to visit a legal loan shark like this.

 

wow take a time out will you!!

 

I use to be with BH and i have made do with out them, for the past 3 years, you can pick up 2nd hand items for 40.00 to 60.00 and for most that are with BH thats about how much they pay to them each week, so they could go and get a 2nd hand cooker within 1 or 2 weeks, you don't always need a cooker to eat?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A reduction in their horrendous prices would help many of their potential and current customers.

 

They seem to add on at least half as much again to the price of an item and add in all the extras to make it seem a good deal - when it isnt.

 

I've had excellent items from our local freecycle group - that is another option open to some people, there are always cookers going on our local one.

 

The trouble is people are lulled into a sense of security and acceptance by these companies and can't get out of the cycle when they are in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read the article that was linked - it was slow in loading when coniff first posted this thread.

 

 

Tracy, whose two older children live elsewhere, says she usually cooks chicken nuggets, pizza and pies for children Blake, 19, Brandon, 18, Brooklyn, 15, Kirstin, 12, and five-year-old Mackenzie when the oven is working.

 

 

Tracy, whose husband David, 42, is unable to work because of disability, said: “It’s not on. I have kids with special needs – Blake has ADHD and Brandon has Asperger’s, so we shouldn’t have been left for that long without a cooker.

 

Some of the comments are quite beastly, however I can understand why they were made.

 

One of the children apparently has ADHD and the above menus are cooked when the oven is working. TBH, that is not cooking it is heating up !! And, why on earth would you feed a child with behavioural problems such dreadful foodstuffs ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would also be nice to see 'layaway' plans available, either as a government backed scheme with a minimal fee, or on offer by stores that sell essential home items. Although it doesn't help in times of emergency, it is useful for some to have that money locked away for the new item, regular smaller payments, and not having to go into debt.

 

I agree about the second hand and freecycle items, these are an excellent resource - apart from a bed we already had, my husband and I kitted out our first unfurnished rented home together with second hand goods for about £150 (14 years ago). You used to be able to get some good second hand stuff from the age concern furniture shops, but their prices have increased.

 

Budgeting loans are still available to those on income based benefits, but in my experience, too many people will use them for a 'nice christmas', rather than what they should be used for, and when something breaks down, don't have that avenue available to them as they're still paying off the last loan.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

When my MiL died we offered a chaity that recycles furniture her belongings and they rejected most of them, even though they give them away because apparently those people living in poverty in Dorset need a large flat screen telly and not a mere 28" JVC with separate Freeview box. They were also hard pushed to accept an almost new washing machine and bed (had been used with mattress cover so spotless), the former because they would have to offer the recipient a guarantee even though it would be donated to them and the bed because it was used.

When I married some 35 years ago we had a secondhand bed that belonged to my grandparents when they got married and didnt have a telly for 2 years and then a valve driven B&W set.

I do think that sometimes people do look a gift horse in the mouth and make everyone else in the same predicament a laughing stock (story above) and sometimes the rules forced upon well-meaning people and charities are too sureal to be believeable but they, like all sterotypes exist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When my MiL died we offered a chaity that recycles furniture her belongings and they rejected most of them, even though they give them away because apparently those people living in poverty in Dorset need a large flat screen telly and not a mere 28" JVC with separate Freeview box. They were also hard pushed to accept an almost new washing machine and bed (had been used with mattress cover so spotless), the former because they would have to offer the recipient a guarantee even though it would be donated to them and the bed because it was used.

When I married some 35 years ago we had a secondhand bed that belonged to my grandparents when they got married and didnt have a telly for 2 years and then a valve driven B&W set.

I do think that sometimes people do look a gift horse in the mouth and make everyone else in the same predicament a laughing stock (story above) and sometimes the rules forced upon well-meaning people and charities are too sureal to be believeable but they, like all sterotypes exist.

 

A lot of charities are set up because someone has seen a gap where they can make big profits for very little outlay and not much work. It's time those applying for charitable status were looked at closer and the ticket not just handed to them because they asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...