Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Honours Trustee Ltd [now Link] /restons claimform - old SLC loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, thanks for reading

 

This matter relates to an old style loan of about 2k taken out in 1991/2 and consistently deferred until 2013,

 

when I moved abroad to work (still earning under the threshold) and my deferral form went missing.

I then forgot about it as got ill and depressed..(have medical evidence to back this up)

 

Moved back to UK in 2014 and was unemployed for nearly a year.. so have never earned anything like the threshold limit.

 

I also turned 50 in 2014 (am now 51)

 

So, the long and short of it is, Student Loan Co wrote saying I was in arrears, then threatenign court action.

. Now it has been passed to solicitors and a case has been opend at County Court

 

I may have forgotten one deferrment form and defnitely sent one that they claim they never got.

. But in any case, I turned 50 wouldnt the debt be wiped?

 

And if I can prove I have never earned above the threshold, will they still have a case against me?

 

How do I defend it?

 

Is it now statute barred ? or has deferring it (until 2013, they claim was the last deferral) meant that it is no longer under the limitations act?

 

I'd welcome your advice, have acknowledged service of court docs, giving myself 28 days to prepare to defend

 

 

Abby

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 297
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The debt can only legally be wiped at 50 or 25 years if you are not currently behind on payments and the loans have not been called in in full.

You will have arrears from failing to defer and they must have called in/terminated the loan agreements for them to be launching legal action now.

 

So sounds like you have missed the boat on ever getting these wiped off under the age conditions.

 

It doesn't matter what you can prove about how much you earned if you failed to defer.

Duty is on you under the loans to defer at the right time. If you don't then again you miss the boat.

 

It's not statute barred as applying for deferment up until 2013 means the 6 years won't have started to run until 2013/4 ish.

 

As for defending I think you probably don't have much realistically you can do,

but may be worth doing a CCA and CPR to see what that turns up.

 

 

Though even that with student loans is usually not much help as the loan agreements are publicly well documented and can easily be reconstituted and argued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Windy sock, I believe at the time of turning 50 I wasnt in arrears as had provided deferrment info up to that point, was a full time masters student 12-13 and then once in Malta sent the info to them...

 

OK, so who do I send the CCA to (and what is a CPR?)

 

The court documents say its Honours trustee c/co wilmington trust

 

I don't recall taking out a loan with them!

 

Thanks again for your help

 

Abby

 

I found this on their website

 

if you were under the age of 40 when you took out the last of your student loans, and your earnings have never reached the threshold required to begin repayment of your loans, Honours Student Loans will automatically cancel your loans when you reach the age of 50. This is dependent on your loans having no arrears at the time of cancellation.

 

As far as I am aware, I had deferred in 2013 (until the end of my course) and had sent in deferral forms covering me for that period (when I turned 50 in Jan 2014)

 

so if I can show that, would they not have to write debt off?

 

I have never made a payment or entered into a payment agreement, as far as I'm aware as I have never crossed the threshold

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you fill this in please and post it back here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

I think you should be OK

You reached 50

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ?-

Honours Trustee Limted

c/o Wilmington Trust

SP Services (London) Ltd

Third Floor 1 Kings Arms Yard EC2R 7AF

- not sure if this is correct - dx its the details of the claimant on the blue claim form

 

Date of issue – 28/07/2015

What is the claim for –

The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant

under a contract dated on or about April 07 1994 in the sum of £3118.78

inclusive of interest to the date of this summons at 2.5% per annum from 07/07/2015 24/07/2015

 

What is the value of the claim? £3118.78

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? student loan

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Student loan taken out in 1994

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

No the original creditor was the Student Loan Company

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No, not that I can recall

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No, from Honours Student Loans

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? no

Why did you cease payments?- I have never paid anything due to my income remaining below the threshold

 

What was the date of your last payment?

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementlink3.gif plan?

I have deferred the loan successfully until (they claim, 2013)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending in deferment forms is not the same thing as being deferred,

and the onus is on you to chase it up if you don't get confirmation of deferment back.

Things do get lost in the post sometimes after all, which would not be HSL's fault.

 

You would have to argue that HSL did receive the forms and it was due to their negligence that you were not deferred at the time you reached 50 and cancellation was due.

 

You would need to defend the claim on that basis, and should perhaps also tell HSL that you are making a formal complaint on their failure to defer you with the FOS as well.

 

I think you may struggle to make a strong enough case if you just didn't bother to chase the deferment up when you didn't get confirmation back, but hope to be proved wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It came in the normal post today, the blue form from the court...

 

I spent 2014 being very ill and depressed.

 

I really can't remember what happened..

 

I went away, I came back..

I sent the deferrment form while In Malta.

. and then came back to be unemployed.

 

. I just sank into a bit of a mire and didn't think.

 

. But I definitely remember sending stuff in before I turned 50.

 

. and yes maybe I can defend the claim on that basis......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you fill that link out properly please

Copy and paste the q post here and add your answers

 

Something is not right

 

Get the CCA request running to the claimant

And the. CPR to the sols who are?

 

You say this was a student loan always with SLC

And you deffered to SLC?

 

I have done the form in post 7 for you

can you please confirm exactly what is typed in the name of claimant section

something phishing going on here my gut says

 

are par chance the sols drydens faifax?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?418397-Urgent-advice-required-CC-CLaim-form-pre98-Honours-student-loans

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It came in the normal post today, the blue form from the court...

 

They is how they normally come yes.

 

You say this was a student loan always with SLC

And you deffered to SLC?

 

Are large tranche were sold to Honours Trustee Limited (trading name Honours Student Loans) who are the claimants here.

 

SLC do NOT own any of these old style ones now so they could not possibly be the claimant. It has to be one of the purchasers.

 

SLC did carry on doing the admin of deferment for many of the loans though, which can confuse as to to ownership.

SLC still do the deferment NOW for cases where you have loans split between Honours, Thesis, Erudio and you are just carrying on an already in place deferment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would a claim letter be hand delivered or sent by normal mail? Does anyone know?

 

Can be sent by normal 1st class post under the Civil Procedure Rules. See CPR Part 6 https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part06

 

In fact under Practice Direction 6A

 

Service by the court

 

8.1 Where the court serves a document in accordance with rule 6.4 or 6.21(2), the method will normally be first class post.

 

which is what happens in most county court claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it was a normal first class royal mail delivery

 

The claimaint is Honours Trustees.. as I filled out the form... to the best of my ability

 

sols are Restons

 

no court stamps just a normal brown envelope with the return address northampton county court on back

 

I'm getting a bit confused but will try and keep up

 

I took the loan out with SLC,

then transferred to honours who have always done the deferring.

 

 

. I have successfully deferred up until 2013 when they claim I stopped, but I definitely sent the forms back!

 

ok CCA to claimaint (Honours Trustees)

 

and CPS (what's this?) to the Solicitors who are Restons

 

and then what?

 

Honours Trustee Limted

c/o Wilmington Trust

SP Services (London) Ltd

3rd Floor 1 Kings Arms Yard

London EC2R 7AF

 

Date of issue – 28 July

 

What is the claim for –

 

 

The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant under a contract dated on or about April 07 1994

in the sum of £3118.78 inclusive of interest to the date of this summons at 2.5% per annum from 07/07/2015 - 24/07/2015

 

What is the value of the claim? £3118.78

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account?

 

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Student loan taken out in 1994

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

 

No the original creditor was the Student Loan Company

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No, from Honours Student Loans

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year? No

Why did you cease payments:-

I have never paid anything due to my income remaining below the threshold

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

I have deferred the loan successfully until (they claim, 2013)

 

thanks for your help in all this

what is the second letter I need to send the SOlS?

I have done the CPR request to the creditors (Honours Trustees?)

 

where do I find the CPR request template?

 

bEst

Abby

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha rectums are involved are they even bigger fleccers than drydens.

urm... dodgy lot.

 

ok CCa request

CPR31:14 from the legal section of the library

 

you need to go read around about honours and their dodgy tactics.

 

all this is is a speculative claim

hoping for a default non defended rubberstamp judgement.

 

have you ack'd {AOS] the claim on the MCOL website yet?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite probably

 

you don't need more time

!!

why give this fleecers more time to magic up paperwork.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb::thumb:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

abby

seems as per windysocks post.

the regs;

12. The lender will cancel the borrower’s liability to repay the loan if the borrower—

(a)dies,

(b)is not behind on any repayments under any agreement for a student loan and—

(i)was under the age of 40 when his last agreement for a student loan was made and he reaches the age of 50 or when the last agreement for a student loan has been outstanding for not less than 25 years, whichever is the sooner, or

(ii)was aged 40 or older when his last agreement for a student loan was made and he reaches the age of 60, or

©if the borrower can show the lender that he gets a disability related benefit and because of his disability is permanently unfit for work.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/211/made

 

they'll prob be saying that you dont meet this criteria re the year short re non deferment. for you then to try and argue otherwise.

 

and the issue of documentation otherwise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ford. I will argue that as I was a) not earning above the threshold at the time of my 50th and had sent the deferment forms in - from Malta, that the loan should be wiped out.

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ford. I will argue that as I was a) not earning above the threshold at the time of my 50th and had sent the deferment forms in - from Malta, that the loan should be wiped out.

 

thank you

 

You would have to word the defence that Honours Trustees should approach the same as SLC under the legislation that applies to the loans and their normal operating practice. Then point to legislation, that you were 50 at the time the court claim was issued, that the loans were deferred up to x date, earnings below threshold for repayment.

 

I am not sure you can just say it should be written off. You have to offer facts to support your case as to why you are not liable. Then it is up to the Judge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed. At the time I turned 50 I was not in arrears.. I had sent in the deferrment forms in good faith, and up to that point (some 20 odd years) I had deferred with no problem, it wouldn't make sense to not defer if I was not earning the threshold (which, working HE, I never have!)

 

So, the onus is on me to prove I sent the forms - which unfortunately I can't. but I can prove my earnings have never crept over the threshold and that I had consistently sent in my defermment forms up until that point.

 

I understand that... will have to do my best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...