Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Grievance reply time


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my work contract states that I have no fixed contracted hours but I have been doing the same pattern of 48 hrs per week for over a year. I am being paid holiday pay based on my last 12 weeks average hours, which is less because of christmas day and new year closure and also some reduced hours for christmas eve and new years eve. I believe I should be paid holiday based on 48hrs per week which is my normal weekly hours, can someone advise me of the correct holiday calculation that should be followed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmzzi .My employer contract says that I have no set weekly working hours but for holiday calculation my employer contract also says that I should consult my employee hand book which states the same as the gov.uk link that you provided in that if my weekly working hours vary then I should calculate holiday pay based on the average hours over the previous 12 weeks, it also goes on to say that if my normal hours are fixed (and mine have been for over a year) that holiday pay is based on my normal working hours. What I am saying is that although the general terms of my contract are that I have no normal fixed weekly working hours the reality is that for well over a year I clearly have been working the same day/hours and therefore the employee handbook rule on this appears to agree with my argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you can get your employer to agree you are working a contractual 48hr week (good luck with that one) the default legal position is the 12 week period.

 

I can't think of any other way and think your on a loser with this one.

 

Agreed. Very unlikely that any employer would issue a 48 hour a week contract in these circumstances - it would set too much of a precedent.

 

All that is required to meet the terms of the WTR is to pay based on the 12 week average

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I am looking for help in calculation of holiday pay. I have no fixed contracted hours but have worked 48hrs per week for a year and a half, because of this I have calculated my previous 12 weeks working hours prior to leave and as I have said this is 48hrs. I believe my leave pay should be as follows, 5.6 weeks annual leave multiplied by 48 hours equals 268.8 hours annual leave divided by 28 annual leave days per year equals 9.6 hours per holiday. My employer has paid me 9.23 hours per holiday and has insisted that this is correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you removed unpaid breaks from your calculations?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is any of your normal working week treated as 'overtime'?

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No overtime, I have a fixed 4 x 12hr shift pattern at the moment which has not changed for at least 18 months, although as I have said I am not contracted to any specific hours per week and this can change but hasn't in the last 18 months. I have used guidance from Gov.UK for someone not on fixed/contracted hours in that the calculation is based on the average work pay over the previous 12 weeks before the leave was taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did ask for an explanation on how the figures were reached but was not given any details, they insisted that the holiday pay was correct and when I told them I disagreed they told me that I had to put it in writing and await a reply which I am now doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am looking for general advice regarding a reasonable amount of time for my employer to reply to a grievance regarding the amount of holiday pay I receive. I have had no further response from my employer other than the initial acknowledgement received two weeks ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking for general advice regarding a reasonable amount of time for my employer to reply to a grievance regarding the amount of holiday pay I receive. I have had no further response from my employer other than the initial acknowledgement received two weeks ago.

 

No set amount of time, unless the companies policy states timescales. It probably just say reasonable time depending on the complexity of the case.

 

I would say a month or two at the most. If there are wider staff issues caused by your grievance, then it might require some working out. Other people may have the same holiday pay issue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, Although I do think a month or two seems a bit long to be considered reasonable for something I consider should be frankly straight forward for my employer to explain i.e. a simple formula / calculation of holiday pay for all employees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, Although I do think a month or two seems a bit long to be considered reasonable for something I consider should be frankly straight forward for my employer to explain i.e. a simple formula / calculation of holiday pay for all employees.

 

But, and it's a big but, if they've got it wrong and it affects everyone in the organisation then they'll take their time crafting a response and working put how to mitigate the issue.

My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be detals set out in your contract/employment handbook regarding timescales for grievence and/or disciplinary procedures.

 

You could ask for a copy of the procedure.

 

IF you are not treated to those timescales, then you could in theory move to the next stage of appeal.

 

Bearing in mind laws relating to holiday pay have changed recently it may well be as above, that they are having to review their policies. BUT at least they should acknowledge your complaint and let you know they are investigating in order to prevent an appeal for an out of time grievance hearing :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you ask to take holiday under the WTR? if so they have to respond within a set time. If this is a grievance about your company not paying you the correct amount then they can drag it out almost indefinitely by just giving a cursory acknowledgement and then promising a full investigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, I can see the implications in regard to impact on employees if they have to review their policies. With regard to the employee handbook and timescales, no timescale is given, it just states that any grievance should be made in writing and also after the hearing my right to appeal etc. but again no timescales given. I have emailed my immediate manager and HR about my lack of any further information/contact since the initial acknowledgment from HR on the 13th July. I have made the claim under sections 221 - 224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...