Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell/carter claim - old welcome finance 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All I am a first time user here please accept my apolgies for any mistakes I make!

 

I have received a County Court Claim form from Bryan carter solictors acting on behalf of Lowell Portfolio

the original debt was with welcome finance 9 years ago.

 

 

I fell into financial difficulty due to divorce and was unable to pay the loan to Welcome,

the last payment I made to Welcome finance was 22nd May 2009

( although I need to clarify this payment with my bank) and the Issue date of the paperwork was the 22nd May 2015.

 

I have never acknowledged the debt to Lowell or Brian Carter solicitors or made any payment to either of them,

I also received a letter from Frederickson International as well (9th April 2015)

also stating that was acting on behalf of Lowell Financial Ltd again I did not respond.

 

I have answered the claim form stating I would like to defend the case and was looking for some advice on how to do so.

 

I have followed some advice on here and sent a CPR 31.14 request along with a £1 postal order

along with a letter asking for a full breakdown of my account.

I also sent another letter requesting copies of the default notice, assignment and Formal demand.

 

 

I received a reply from Bryan Carter ( attached) stating that its a simple contractual matter

and part 31 of the civil procedure rules will not apply and in any event the notices of default

and assignment left the control of the claimant when they were dispatched to me,

they also state it is the original creditors policy to issue agreements at the start of the contract

and statements throughout the agreement and in this regard we ask you to refer to my own records.

 

I have not yet received a copies of the following:

 

A copy of the agreement

A copy of the original assignment form and any consideration paid

a copy of any formal demands or default notices

 

I have received a breakdown of costs allegedly from Welcome finance which includes £734.25 worth of charges and fees ( Total debt £3953.67 )

The Claim form states a total claimed of £4534.98 as they have added the court costs and solicitors fees twice by mistake!

 

I am just waiting for a court date what if anything can I do in the meantime,

my credit file is now decent for the first time in 6 years!

 

Many many thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a case of holding your nerve, submitting a defence and seeing what happens. BC issues loads of court claims, but they don't always continue with them, if they don't think they can overcome a defence.

 

When did you take out the loan with Welcome ?

 

When did the account go into default ?

 

Was the payment you made in May 2009 in response to a default notice issued ?

 

Can you answer these questions and any that follow. We need to understand the exact position, to identify best way forward.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thank you for your reply

 

 

I am unsure of the exact date in taking out the loan it was around 2004 but I have not yet received the paperwork from Welcome or Brian carter solicitors, I have never received a default notice, the payment was made in 2009 as my attempts to keep the payments up to date this was the last payment made, is the account statute barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jocker and welcome to CAG

 

If you would read the folowing and respond by posting your responses here alongside to the following link..

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

You state the issue date was 22nd May 2015...so I would assume you have already submitted a form of defence.....if you could also post that here.

 

Also your uploads are too small please convert them to PDF format please.(please redact any identifiable data first)

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thank you for your reply

 

 

I am unsure of the exact date in taking out the loan it was around 2004 but I have not yet received the paperwork from Welcome or Brian carter solicitors, I have never received a default notice, the payment was made in 2009 as my attempts to keep the payments up to date this was the last payment made, is the account statute barred?

 

It is probably not statute barred, but find out the last date of payment.

 

They need the original CCA or a copy of it, to enforce in court, given that the loan was issued before April 2007.

 

At the moment your defence is the failure of BC to answer a CCA request and to not respond properly to the CPR request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this the only loan you had with welcome?

did you ever phone them and explain your financial troubles and they refinanced it for you

and gave you a new/reduced figure?

 

 

that letter from carter is the std one he always sends out regarding CPR means nothing.

did you send a CCA request & the £1 fee?

have they responded to that yet?

 

 

get that link fill out and we'll get you sorted

 

 

the fees/charges reclaim might be useful under mediation if it ever gets that's far.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thank you for your reply,

 

 

this was a restructured loan or top up

 

 

I had on an existing loan( all payments up to date on the existing loan)

 

 

I informed them at the time of default that I was experiencing financial difficulties due to the divorce/separation but I did not receive any reduced settlement.

 

 

I have sent a CCA request with a postal order for £1 by recorded delivery this was done on the 9th July 2015,

as of today I have not received a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet it was signed by welcome staff over the phone.

does the agreement number on the claimform match that of the original loan number?

 

 

can you fill the link in post 5

and paste the questions back to a quick reply box here and add in your answers

thank you

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Bryan carter solicitors LLP[/b]

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 22nd May 2015

 

 

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The Claimants Claim is for the sum of £3953.67 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and welcome finance under account reference xxxxxxxx and assigned to the claimant on on 05/09/12 notice to which has been given to the defendant. The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments under the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served and not compiled with. The claimant also claims statutory interest pursuant to S.69 of the county act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment of the agreement to date but limited to a maximum of one year amounting to £316.31.

What is the value of the claim? £4534.98

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? NO

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?15th September 2006

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.The claim has been issued by the debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NO

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year NO

 

Why did you cease payments? Unable to pay due to divorce

 

What was the date of your last payment? 25th may 2009 ( allegedly)

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a plan? NO

Link to post
Share on other sites

And the defence you have submitted ....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

came have the name of the claimant on the claimform

 

and

 

does the agreement number on the claimformlink3.gif match that of the original loan number you signed [not the refinanced one]?

or the refinance one?

 

and did you sign the refinance agreement or was this done on the phone?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi My defence is no debt is acknowledged to your company yet you have contacted me regarding this account.

 

 

The letter I sent was downloaded from this site under the Limitation act 1980.s.% so I am stating the account is statute barred.

 

 

Is this incorrect, will I need to submit a new defence?

 

 

thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very vague responses....still lets try to assist....

 

What date (month) in 2007 did you enter this agreement?

 

What defence did you submit through MCOL (verbatim) ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am really sorry, I entered into the agreement on the 15th September 2006 as outlined in the payment schedule from Welcome finance which was sent to me by Lowell, the defence I submitted through MCOL was the following by letter:

 

 

I intend to defend the claim in full.

 

 

the letter states:

 

 

No debt is acknowledged to your company yet you have contacted me regarding the above account.

 

 

As I am sure you are aware, under the Limitation Act 1980, s.5 "an action found on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued."

 

 

No correspondence/payment/acknowledgment of this debt has been made within the last six years and accordingly unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under s.5 of the Limitation Act 1980, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me to recover any alleged account claimed.

 

 

Furthermore, the FCA Consumer Credit Sourcebook (section 7.15) states that "Notwithstanding that a debt may be recoverable, a firm must not attempt to recover a statute barred debt in England, Wales or Northern Ireland if the lender or owner has not been in contact with the customer during the limitation period." and that "A firm must not continue to demand payment from a customer after the customer has stated that he will not be paying the debt because its statute barred."

 

 

Please send me a copy of the original agreement.

 

 

Please send me a copy of the assignment form signed by both parties on 5th September 2012

 

 

I await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

 

I look forward to your early reply.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

This forms the crux of my defence, sorry for the vague answers its my first time on here I know understand all of the information supplied is better!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay ...many thanks....

 

The date of agreement is important because if its pre April 2007 then they will have to disclose the original executed agreement...no recons can be used to waffle a judge.

 

You state your last payment was 25th May 2009 (allegedly) why allegedly ? who states it was?

 

The claim was issued on the 25th May 2015 (so that is exactly 6 years and not allowing for any missed payments or default notice to be served and complied with) normally it would be 6 years and say 2/3/ months to allow for time.

 

So you need to firm that last payment date up.....perhaps check your CRA files and check the default date notice entered.

 

I assume you submitted the above defence by the date required ...being 26th June 2015?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thank you for your reply,

 

Yes I entered the defence before the deadline

 

, I need to check with my bank to see if the payment was made as its a long time ago and they tried to add spurious charges and fees to my account before,

 

I have not yet received the original agreement,

I sent them a recorded delivery CPR request along with a postal order for £1 on the 9th July 2015,

is there a time limit for a reply and if that time limit expires is this still enforceable without a copy of the agreement,

 

if this is indeed the case will I have to submit an amended defence?

 

I will check my CRA files to see when the default was entered

I did not receive any notice of assignment or default but I have moved house twice in the last 6 years.

 

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" is there a time limit for a reply and if that time limit expires is this still enforceable without a copy of the agreement, if this is indeed the case will I have to submit an amended defence? "

 

No time limit for a CPR request...its a civil request and the claimant is not compelled to respond.......the CCA request is 12 +2 days and if they fail to comply they are in default and unable to enforce (in theory)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to amending defences...wait until the claimant decides to proceed.(they have 28 days to respond to your defence and inform the court if they wish to proceed) otherwise the claim is stayed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

In reality that should have gone to the claimant...not the Solicitor...but I doubt either will/would respond.......nothing further for you to do now until they decide to proceed or not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Andyorch I hope you are well

 

I received the following letter yesterday dated 7th September

 

Hearing date 18th December 2015

 

We write further to the court dated 6th Auguest 2015.

 

You will note the witness statement is due to be filed and served by both parties on 2nd December 2015 and the trial bundle by 11th December 2015.

 

We propose and earlier exchange of witness statements on 12th October 2015 to allow time to compile the trial bundle. Please confirm your consent or an alternative date.

 

We recommend you seek independent legal advice.

 

BRYAN CARTER SOLICITORS

 

I honestly do not understand this letter at all,

this is the first I have heard since receiving a letter from the court dated 2nd June 2015 acknowledging my defence

and the claimant must contact the court within 28 days or the claim will be stayed,

 

 

is there any way I can find out if this happened within the allocated timeframe?

 

 

the initial correspondence I have still not received a copy of the original signed credit report despite sending a CCA request on the 9th July 2015 with a postal order for £1, this was sent recorded delivery.

 

 

I have also sent a request for documents under CPR31.14 for copies of

1. The agreement contract.

2. Default Notice.

3.Assignment.

4.Formal demand.

Again I have not received anything.

 

 

Please could you advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jocker...very well thank you.

 

They are referring to the court directions...all parties must comply with the directions by the dates stated...the Directions are contained within the Notice of Allocation (you should have received this after you submitted your Directions Questionnaire N180/181)

 

Each party is expected to complete Standard Disclosure ...this is disclosing all documents you are going to rely on that you may have referred to within your defence or Witness Statement (this must also be complied with after Standard Disclosure)

 

Witness statements are submitted to support your defence....its an account in your own words as to why you defended the claim ..along with supporting documents (if any documents are referred to within your Witness Statement) Witness statements are exchanged simultaneously by the dates stated within the Notice of Allocation.

 

So the letter you have received is simply asking for those dates to be brought forward and asking for your agreement of same.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...