Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty 18 month old Sky+HD box


Argyll
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Sky+HD box won't come out of standby.

 

 

I called Sky CS to be informed as my box was out of it's 12 month warranty

I would have to pay a charge of £60 which they quickly brought down to £30.

 

I'm not happy about an 18 month box being faulty and being forced to stump up £30.

 

 

I would have thought I would be covered by the SOGA as I wouldn't consider 18 months a reasonable length of time.

 

Opinions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Sky+HD box won't come out of standby. I called Sky CS to be informed as my box was out of it's 12 month warranty I would have to pay a charge of £60 which they quickly brought down to £30.

 

I'm not happy about an 18 month box being faulty and being forced to stump up £30. I would have thought I would be covered by the SOGA as I wouldn't consider 18 months a reasonable length of time.

 

Opinions?

 

Are you in the minimum term of your contract?

If not, tell them you want to cancel, as you have no use for a Sky service you can't watch .......

 

See how long it takes for them to back down, and what else they'll offer you to stay!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies I should have mentioned this in my OP. I re-contracted with them last October. My subscription does not end until October this year.

 

I have a mind to cancel my direct debit to see what they'll do but I also have broadband and phone with them and can't lose those.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a mind to cancel my direct debit to see what they'll do

 

You'll be playing into their hands if you do this!

 

Escalate your complaint, and tell them that you won't be paying their fee, as any warranty they added is in addition to your statutory rights.

 

So you're very happy for them to refuse to repair the box as you'll report them to trading standards to investigate.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies I should have mentioned this in my OP. I re-contracted with them last October. My subscription does not end until October this year.

 

I have a mind to cancel my direct debit to see what they'll do but I also have broadband and phone with them and can't lose those.

 

 

A point to consider when renewing a contract : insist on a new box (for the new warranty, or extension of current box guarantee) when signing up to a new minimum term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A point to consider when renewing a contract : insist on a new box (for the new warranty, or extension of current box guarantee) when signing up to a new minimum term.

 

Hindsight is a great thing :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are covered by soga.

matters not if its out of warranty.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as a side issue

most of these problems are due to bad sectors on the hard drive.

 

 

you can fix these by using copy+ software and your PC

but you have to take the drive out the sky box

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed the CEO Jeremy Darroch with my complaint and received the following reply from his assistant:

 

 

Dear ****** Customer Account Number - *********

 

 

Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Mr Darroch regarding your Sky+HD box.

My name is Erica, I work within the Executive Support Team and I will be investigating your enquiry on Mr Darroch's behalf.

 

 

I am very sorry to hear of the difficulties you are experiencing with your Sky+HD box,

I tried to contact you on the mobile and landline number we have saved on your account to discuss this over the telephone with you.

 

 

What are the issues that you are experiencing with your box as we can certainly go through some troubleshooting to try and resolve this without sending an engineer.

If we are not able to resolve this, then we would need to send an engineer,

 

 

we cover the equipment for the first 12 months and it advises this in your terms and conditions as well.

Once the warranty runs out, customers can then take out insurance to cover their equipment,

get an independent engineer, purchase a new box from a third party or Sky can send an engineer out for 65.00GBP

which covers all parts and labour with a 90 days warranty.

 

 

If the box needs replacing, the cost will cover a replacement box,

it would be a reconditioned box and again this comes with a 90 days warranty.

 

 

I hope this information helps,

please let me know by return if there is anything further you require.

Kind Regards Erica Montgomery Executive Support Team

 

 

I responded to Erica with this:

 

 

Dear Miss Montgomery,

The box won't come out of standby mode which I've tried to rectify via your helpline.

I was offered a refurbished box from your helpline for a fee.

It is not right that I should be made to pay any fee for a box that is only 19 months old.

I understand you supply a one year warranty with the box but this is in addition to my statutory rights.

The 'Sale of Goods Act' covers my statutory right.

 

 

As I explained in my original email to Mr Darroch my understanding is under the 'Sale of Goods Act' goods should be of satisfactory quality

and should last a reasonable length of time.

 

 

I would not consider a sky box which failed at 19 months old to have lasted a reasonable length of time.

I have been a member of Sky since 2009.

 

 

My previous Sky+ plus box is 6 years old and still going strong at my parents house.

 

 

As I understand it a judge recently declared a television should last a minimum of 6 years from the date of purchase.

I would expect a sky box to last the same length of time.

I would like my sky box to be either repaired or replaced at no cost to me.

I wish to resolve this matter without the need to take my complaint to the small claims court.

 

 

I sincerely hope you respect my statutory rights as a consumer.

 

 

Opinions what I should do next if they will to honour my rights?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never threaten SCC this early. Youll get their backs up.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never threaten SCC this early. Youll get their backs up.

 

Ok thanks but I've sent it now lol. I just get fed up fannying about with them when they really should be playing fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've just replied with this:

 

 

 

 

Dear Mr ****** Thank you for your reply to my e-mail.

 

 

As stated in the terms of conditions of your Sky contract, we only cover the first 12 months,

any service calls out with the 12 months are chargeable.

 

 

If you would like Sky to resolve this for you, it will be chargeable for the engineer to come out.

 

 

Kind Regards Erica Montgomery Executive Support Team

 

 

So should I just plough ahead and take out a small claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

ask them the simple straight forward question.

 

 

where do you stand with your required compliance with the sale of goods act.?

your item has failed with a 'reasonable time'

under the act, you are responsible for its on going quality.

 

 

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the trouble with uneducated huge corporations, especially Murdoch & his crew!

 

They think they can get away with ignoring consumer rights, and expect customers to be happy

with their scripted responses.

 

Do as DX says, see what they say, and then you will know where you can go from there.

 

Personally, and purely IMO, I would be kicking them into touch and voting with my feet, no ifs buts maybes,

''Thank you for your reply, I have now terminated the contract, and will return the faulty box, card, and handset to yourselves,

this concludes the matter.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I challenged them them on their interpretation of the SOGA this was their reply:

 

Dear Mr ******

Thank you for your reply to my e-mail.

At the point of sale and under the Sale of Goods Act, we make it clear to our customers that it is a 12 month warranty, after the warranty it is then our customers decision if they wish to take out any extended warranty from any other company or pay for any engineers.

If customer's believe that there has been a fault on the equipment from when it was purchased, they would need to provide evidence under the Sale of Goods Act, and Sky would replace the equipment free of charge if this is proven.

Kind Regards

Erica Montgomery

Executive Support Team

I sought advice from my Trading Standards Officer who advised me they were in breach so I sent this:

 

 

Dear Miss Montgomery,

 

I have tried to rectify the fault through your help desk, performing a soft and hard reset and a software upgrade. Neither of these methods worked. Clearly there is a fault with the box itself. A member of your staff even offered me the option of exchanging the box at my doorstep for a fee. So even your own staff accept the box is faulty.

 

I have taken all reasonable steps to rectify the problem and I have given you the opportunity to either repair or replace my Sky box. None of these options you accept without being forced to pay a fee.

 

As I have already explained to you regardless of whether my Sky box is out with its warranty period it should still last a ‘reasonable length of time’. You do not make up your own rules to suit your self. This is why the Sale of Goods Act was introduced to stop company’s such as yours making up your own rules and deceiving the public.

 

I have sought advice from my local Council Trading Standards who agree with me that you are in breach of the sale of goods act and it would be reasonable to assume the box should last longer than 19/20 months.

 

I wish to resolve this matter amicably and without the need for court intervention but you really are pushing me into a corner here. Kindly repair or replace the box please or I shall have no option but to instigate proceedings in Falkirk’s small claims court without any further notice to you.

 

 

Kindly govern yourself accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would cancel my subscription. If your in contract still then demand they stop charging for a service they know you can not receive.... As without their equipment you can not use the service.

 

I had the same issue so said I would buy a third party receiver which is both cheaper and more functional, they said I couldn't and it has too be a sky box, they then gave me a free box replacement.

They usually do back down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

great letters

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

See what I mean, re-writing the rules!!

 

Specious company, makes my teeth itch...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

People do push their luck and try and get blood out of a stone and sorry I'm with Sky on this one, you signed a contract, agreed to it and now your trying to change the terms by extending your side of said contract.

 

 

By signing Sky's contract and receiving a subscription you agreed to a 12 months warranty and that's the end of the matter sorry.

 

 

You cocked up by extending the subscription and keeping the old STB you should of started a new contract with a new STB and a fresh warranty.

 

 

Tip: Spend £20 quid, buy one off EBay and use that and save yourself a lot of letter writing and headaches or pay the fee, get a reconned box and start again.

 

 

If you ran a shop, sold electrical goods and a customer returned 18 months later saying the very same thing sorry theirs the door bye.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky have nothing to do with Murdoch and his crew he has shares in the company and that's it but people still tar people and companies with the same brush.

 

 

This is the trouble with uneducated huge corporations, especially Murdoch & his crew!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry that's wrong

any warranty is in addition to your statutory rights under SOGA and alike

it does not negate or replace them.

 

 

time you read the sale of goods act

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...