Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sussex Security Solutions Ltd - T/A Parking Enforcement Co - Eastgate Wharf in Lewes.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2460 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my 1st post.

 

Have received a 'Contractual Payment Charge' from the above for parking on a road on double yellow lines with a valid Disabled Blue Badge clearly displayed on my dashboard.

 

There were no visible signs apart from a sign at the entrance to a car park opposite.

 

I made an appeal on the day it was issued explaining he circumstances (was with my elderly, disabled Aunt blah blah blah).

 

Can anyone suggest what I should do?

 

Thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hello and welcome to CAG. The guys should be along later or tomorrow with advice for you.

 

When you say you made an appeal, was this verbally or in writing please? I'm a bit confused about why you have a letter from a private parking company if you were on a public road, is this what happened?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for reply.

 

I appealed on their website the day I got the ticket.

 

I was parked on Eastgate Wharf which is a road behind a supermarket in Lewes, East Sussex.

 

I am confused too but I am assuming it's a private road

(although like I said there were no signs on the side I parked only on a post opposite at the entrance to a small private car park).

 

Any help would be great as I don't feel I should pay as was complying with the blue badge guidelines.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no such thing as. BB's and dyl's on a private road.

They mean nothing.

Merely tarmac graffiti.

 

What date did this. Happen

And have you had the notice to keepers letter?

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Thanks for reply. I haven't had notice to keeper letter as yet.

It happened on 21 June 15. There were definitely double yellow lines which is why I parked there with the blue badge.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this behind Waitrose?

 

Hang fire for now as I am fairly sure that the signage is really ambiguous and this together with 101 other reasons means that they haven't got a leg to stand on.

 

Basically, as DX says above, the yellow lines mean nothing anyway as this is a private road, and for the same reason neither does a blue badge.

 

When was the ticket issued? Did you phone and appeal or did you appeal in writing?

 

Subject to timelines and what you have done and said already, you will be needing to appeal in writing, which will fail, but the parking operator will need to give you a code to appeal further to the IAS (Independant Appeals Service) and then the issue of signage may be relevant.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes it was behind waitrose. I had to park there as it was on a Sunday and a bootsale was taking place in pay and display car park I was heading to. It was on 21 June 2015 and I appealed through their website on the day it was issued. No email response from them to date. Should I request what I imagine will be their rejection of my appeal and go from there?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

What were the grounds for your appeal and did you appeal as the driver or the owner of the vehicle?

 

No need to do anything at this stage if they haven't informed you of the outcome. You certainly shouldn't even be thinking about paying. Parking issues are not altogether my field but I have a certain history with this outfit.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - My grounds were on the basis of being out for the day with my elderly and disabled aunt and parking with the blue badge clearly displayed as I understood to be required when parking on double yellow lines. I stated that I had seen no signs showing the road to be privately owned and that I considered it to be lawful. Don't think I stated I was driver or owner in the email appeal .

I guess your history isn't an amicable one?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - not amicable at all.....but I nailed them in another

 

Nothing wrong with what you have said so far. From memory I think there is a badly painted 'Private - no parking' sign on the road leading to a pay and display car park. I am over that way tomorrow so will have a look for you.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much. Really appreciate it, I was parked opposite and between the entrance/exit to pay and display and the private car park where I saw the sign I assumed related to private car park.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have already jumped the gun what you do now is wait for their response to your appeal. When you get that you should get a POPLA code or invitation to appeal to the IAS The former are pretty robust in their application of the relevant law but the latter are a bunch of incompetents or liars, we havent determined which yet. When you get your letter back we can help you, basically the company doesnt have any rights to demand money but theu like to think they do so you have to follow certain protocols to defeat them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parking Enforcement Ltd use the IAS, Ericsbrother. They seem to be more on the side of the PPC, but did rule against PE in my own dispute with them over use of the word 'May' in their signage being too ambiguous to form a contractual agreement.

 

Anyhoo. Went to the site as promised this morning and have attached some photos which the OP might find useful when making an IAS appeal. Completely inadequate, unreadable from the road and not even displayed anywhere on the side of the road where the OP parked. IAS own code of practice states that there must be clear signage at the entrance to an area, but all there is here is a notice painted on the road which one can only see if looking for it AND it states Private No Parking but 20 yards further than this is an NCP car park!

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]58364[/ATTACH]

  • Confused 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for getting the photos. I wouldn't have seen the road paintings as there was traffic in front of me which would have blocked that and it seems clear from your photos that there are no signs on the side of the road I had parked.

 

Should I be worried that I haven't had any response to my original appeal (concerned about time I may have to appeal to IAS if necessary). Would they write or email?

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they dont respond then they lose the right to ask for money.

One advantage of the IAS appeals system is that it is so rubbish it damages the chances of a court claim for the parking company so even if the IAS say the parking co is right they wont want to go further and have their backsides exposed to proper scrutiny. This is all about threats and bluff rather than any contractual right

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your help. I guess I'll wait to see what happens and then will come back if I do get anything else from them.

I'm really grateful for all the advice and time taken to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Hi again

I've received today a 'Notice to Keeper' from Parking Enforcement regarding the PCN I received on 21 June. Both ericsbrother and sidewinder advised to come back if I got anything and you may be able to help in my appeal against it. I never received a response to my email appeal which (stupidly I know) I submitted the day I received the PCN.

You were all so helpful before and I wondered what should I do now?

 

Can you convert to PDF please? We can't read the jpeg!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello n1ch3s. For speed, I have removed your entire post as the attachment you've posted up has your name and address and car reg for a start.

 

Please can you edit any personal details with Paint or a similar program so you can't be identified?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although your post is hidden at the moment, I have seen it. Does page two say anything about appeals because the first page does not give any inkling that the charge can be appealed.

 

It only gives you two choices

 

1 pay the charge

 

2 notify them of the driver and pass on the notice to that driver

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. I can move the crosses out of the way to see your details.

 

Ideally you should white them out and don't forget to remove the ref number at the bottom.

 

In the meantime, I am going to play around to see what I can do.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - I am officially useless with attachments and editing!!

Page 2 - re appeals just says: ' At the time the charge was incurred, a Notice to Driver' was affixed to the vehicle. This offered the driver the ability to appeal within 21 days from its imposition. This opportunity has now lapsed and we regret the ability to appeal this charge is no longer available. If you consider there to be exceptional circumstances as to why you should be allowed to appeal outside of this period then you should send your reasons to us, in writing, at the above address.

If we do consider your appeal and it is rejected then you may appeal to the Independent Appeals Service. Details will be provided with the appeal rejection'.

 

I did appeal on the day the PCN was issued but never have received a response, either by email or post. This is the first correspondence from them.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously I still can't see the NTK, but from what is being described, then I don't think they are using the POFA and keeper liability...

 

Now if you gave your name and address when you appealed the NTD, then they are more stupid than the average PPC!

 

And if you didn't then they have no way of knowing who the driver was unless you tell them... which you won't of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...