Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with contract change


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3207 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I work in a major supermarket Monday to Friday 6 hours per day. I have worked there for nearly 30 years. Today I was called into the office and was TOLD that I must now work every Sunday from the 20th July. I informed them that I opted out of Sundays in the late 80s when the new laws regarding Sunday trading came in . I was then TOLD that if I did not work Sunday then my hours would be cut by 6 hours.

I assumed that when I opted out that this sort of thing would not happen and was protected by the law .

Was I wrong ?

There was no consultation and I feel that 3 weeks is not much notice for such a big change.

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, sounds like they want some free publicity if you ask me...

 

ASDA by any chance?

 

Are you a member of any trade union?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what's the free publicity ?

Press and the media.

 

So he's basically blackmailing you to work Sundays or he'll cut your hours?

Sounds a delightful chap, no wonder retail has such a bad rep.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like to me some manager has misread the legislation.]

 

It is true that that if you are working a sunday THEN choose to opt out they are not obliged to to REPLACE the hours to other times of the week

 

HOWEVER to peanalise you for refusing to opt IN to sundays after opting out speaks of Victimisation

 

I would be going to see HR and refusing to change or even discuss the change unless they put it in writing that you will have your hours CUT if you refuse to do so.

 

See how that ball bounces :)

 

AS for your union rep, I would now be asking for the contact of his Area Organiser

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read this https://www.gov.uk/sunday-working

read it again

then read it again

then read it again and do your damned hardest to pick a hole in your position from your employers side, spin it, cheat, try all sort of spurious arguments you think they might try

 

If it's still watertight print it off and hand it to them (sooner rather than later)

If not come back for more advice.

 

Expect them to either

 

a) huff puff and do nothing to change your terms

b) tell you tough

c) come back with a counter argument (may be valid or rhubarb)

 

Your at the start of a game, a game played with your personal life but still a game.

 

The more you know about your rights and the rules of this game the more chance you have of saying "sorry but no thanks"

 

(Note to other forum denziens - it can't be as easy in the link to say no as i'm seeing can it?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your employer is really on a sticky wicket here.

 

You can actually bring a Tribunal claim for a detriment suffered as a result of asserting your right to opt out of Sunday working. Reducing your hours would be a clear detriment IMO.

 

I'd get a formal grievance in ASAP and make it very clear that you are asserting your statutory rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur with the advice on seeking help from Regional Officer. They will have access to resources that lay reps dont and their contacts book will probably see this one off for a few years without a formal meeting. You can phone head office and ask for contact details.

I also agree with going down the grievance route, Your employer has so many layers of management that each doesnt know what the ones above or below are doing and saying so this will make them all have to talk to each other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think it would help; print off and show them the relevant legislation below...

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/part/IV

 

...and highlight the part in 42(4) that states...

 

you have the right to complain to an employment tribunal if, because of your refusal to work on Sundays on which the shop is open, your employer— dismisses you, or does something else detrimental to you,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well having shown them that they cannot take a days pay off me because I opted out of Sundays they now say I have to work Saturday and will force me to if necessary. I have a contract Monday to Friday for the last 25 years , it seem they just want to push me out now and there is not a lot I can do . Any ideas ? Thanks so far for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saturdays are not protected in the same way. So, job change time.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a contract Monday to Friday for the last 25 years , it seem they just want to push me out now and there is not a lot I can do . Any ideas ? Thanks so far for the advice.

 

Hmm employment tribunal??

 

Excellent proof that your loyalty doesn't mean diddly!

 

I'd be making as much noise as possible about this, it is categorically unfair, if not unlawful, so whilst

exhausting their complaints procedure and jumping through all the hoops they put in your way, I would be talking

to my local MP, and tipping off the press about the unethical way your employer is treating you.

 

Why don't you inform the CEO?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm employment tribunal??

 

Excellent proof that your loyalty doesn't mean diddly!

 

I'd be making as much noise as possible about this, it is categorically unfair, if not unlawful, so whilst

exhausting their complaints procedure and jumping through all the hoops they put in your way, I would be talking

to my local MP, and tipping off the press about the unethical way your employer is treating you.

 

Why don't you inform the CEO?

 

I can see the headline now.

 

"Person in retail asked to work busiest sales day of the week."

 

Zero milage with press or MP; don't waste their time. Not unlawful at all.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see the headline now.

 

"Person in retail asked to work busiest sales day of the week."

 

Zero milage with press or MP; don't waste their time. Not unlawful at all.

 

Which is probably why your employee of the year?.:noidea:

 

The contract you have, unless they're demanding you sign a new one, with a gun to your head, will IMO trump everything.

 

What is apparent is that they have demanded you work Sundays, failure to do so will render you to punishment by reducing your hours, (Blackmail).

 

Then when they realise that they are likely to get exposed for this, they change tack and state you MUST work another day instead?

The next thing you know they'll be putting you on the slave labour heap and demand you work a zero hours contract.

 

IMO if you don't stand your ground now and expose them for the bullies they are, then they are going to walk all over you, and pull your strings as and when it suits them.

 

Media and your local MP (who is paid by you to sort out this sort of thing) is one avenue I would be looking at.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well before you start your online petition, let's ask

 

- what does the contract say about varying hours

- what does the union say

- is OP prepared to accept the consequences of refusing the change?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/8/6/Varying-a-contract-of-employment-accessible-version.pdf

 

A better guide on how to deal with contractual change and the rights and pitfalls if you say no.

 

I'm not against people going to the media or MP but in my experience they won't give a dam and it is beyond pointless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the change reasonable?

 

If you have caring commitments on the Saturday , etc or being asked to work a night instead of a day then you can argue that it is unreasonable.

 

I would now be asking the HR in writing for a copy of the company policy for moving peoples hours around the business. Being a supermarket they will have a formal policy that they have to follow.

 

Then when you digest that you can see what position you are in for resisting the change and or following the grievance procedure.

 

Whatever you do, do not even "work Saturday" under protest as this would be seen as accepting the change.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say stick to your guns, the company has a massive recruitmant and retention problem in most areas so I doubt they want to lose a loyal member of staff. The change is about trying to plug gaps in their existing workload so they dont want to be interviewing and recruiting new people. As siad before, your store has many layers of management so make sure that the top person is the one making the decision, even if it is the wrong one as you wont have to go through this all over again next month. In store HR can be quite good and will often make good the problens caused by the lower tier management.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...