Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all   I am in need of a second opinion of what I believe to be a brush off by my travel insurance company regarding a claim for accommodation that I booked in Lanzarote that I was unable to utilise in June.   I submitted a claim with a copy of the email from the hotel advising the accommodation was non refundable, a copy of my credit card statement showing what I paid, the original booking email showing payment which also states it’s non refundable and a copy of the emails from EasyJet cancelling the flights.   I have received a response from the insurance company representatives Travel Claim Services Ltd on behalf of ASDA Travel (underwriters are MAPFRE) referring me back to the credit card company to make a Section 75 claim.   Now I thought this is what travel insurance is for and they are just fobbing me off back to the credit card company as my policy documents clearly state they will pay for any accommodation I cannot recover in the event of advice from the Foreign Office issuing advice not to travel following an epidemic which is pretty much exactly what has happened....   Would this be regarded as a simple breach of contract by not doing what they say they will in the event of the prescribed conditions which have been met and agreed to by the parties or am I over simplifying and would this be considered sufficient as a cause of action should I look to recover my claim using MCOL?   Cheers in advance    Kjun
    • At least you’ve removed the reference to “Freedom pass” (that because this wasn’t a freedom pass abuse case:  showed it was a “cut n paste”). hopefully you’ll get advice on ‘polishing’ this, while keeping it “your own words” (which have more chance of success!)
    • Hi everyoen, i am currently in a battle with DPD as we have not paid outstanding invoices due to them damaging our delivery. We tried very hard to ask for compensation and i have copied the email trial below. I have now jsut received a letter beofre aciton from them. Has anyone got any advice on this please:   Please see the version of events below. I am disgusted with how I have been passed from pillar to post between multiple members of staff, I feel like this is where the confusion has arisen. I keep have to re-explain situations and conversations I have had throughout.   If you don’t mind, I am just going to detail to journey I have been on attempting to sort this claim just so I know we are all on the same page as I do not know how we have come out with a closed claim.   Original consignment raised 14/4 – 9 boxes. 8 out of these 9 boxes were delivered 15/4 and for some strange reason the last box was delivered on the 16th. When I raised this issue asking ‘’why has this consignment been split delivered?’’ I was told that’s just what happens and there’s nothing they can do to stop that happening. I wish this was the only issue with this delivery.   15/16th Our customer telephoned to describe the poor state of these boxes and that the extremely important components inside were rejected due to the great bashing they received during transport.  my managing director, spoke to Jess who originally came to visit us when we first opened our account. He explained the situation and she said she would sort a claim out and look into this for us. 27/4 - I followed up via email with Jess, asking where the claims form was. She mentioned nothing during the above phone call, or on emails about the photographic evidence we would need to claim for our goods (Conveniently!). As if she would have mentioned, we could have taken more photos etc. 29/4 - I received a response from Jess simply saying she had raised the claim. 1/5 – I chased again, as I still had not received a claim email. 4/5 – Someone new emailed from the claims department (no name) to say we could not raise a claim as we had not contacted within 14 days of the delivery saying our first contact was the ‘’29/4’’ I was very confused at this point as Jess above mentioned the claim has been raised and now I was being told we could NOT raise a claim? I replied to this email address (no name) stating the conversation we had regarding the issue the day after the delivery was made – I was then told that this phone call was sufficient as means of conversation and that the claim would be raised. 5/5 – Finally, I received a claims email to start my claim. 5/5 – I was told ‘’For all claims we do require accurate proof of costings ensuring the proof of costs you are uploading onto the claim form matches the value being claimed for.’’ This email came from a new lady called ‘Georgina’ this is exactly what I did which made my claim now for a much higher value. I created a spreadsheet detailing every single penny we had lost on this including, machining, tools, labour, cleaning, packing etc. She also apologised for my experience with DPD. 7/5 I received an ‘’Oops you have missed something’’ I forwarded this onto the claims email address asking what I had missed as I did not understand. 11/5 Someone replied – saying you required photo evidence of external, internal, parcel label and damage. 12/5 I emailed back with my response. Explaining it was very clear there was a DPD Label on the box from the photo evidence. They asked me to describe internal packaging as all they could see was ‘’cardboard trays’’ I felt at this point no one wanted to sort my claim and just find a reason not to get this resolved. Multiple occasions DPD spoke about our packaging, originally with Karan and Jess upon setup of our account and now they were being referred to as ‘cardboard trays’. I had to email back again to say the following ‘’ - they aren’t just cardboard trays they are fitted egg trays. Each component goes into one of the segments and the trays are layered one on top of the other. We then wrap these tightly in shrink wrap to prevent movement. Boxes are then taped up securely, and cut to size if there is empty space in box.’’ 20/5 – Dan phoned, I mentioned that no one had responded to my email about packaging/ evidence. He asked me to resend this on which I did. (see attached as requested by Bianca)   I had someone try to phone a couple of times while I was away at the end of May. I emailed Laura on the 8/6 when I returned to work to say our accounts department would provide DPD with payment dates for outstanding invoices once the claim had been resolved.   9/6 I received a credit for £27.35. I emailed back to ask how I had only received £27.35. I received a response from yet again a new staff member, Bianca, letting me know this was purely a credit for the delivery consignment. ‘’ I can confirm that the credit note is for the carriage costs. Consignment 6801616300 / Claim 824843 is closed because you didn't respond to our further information request.’’ At this point I’m baffled at how the above isn’t sufficient as a response for the information requested? Multiple emails, this may have been as each staff member had to pick up the whole trail as they looked at this issue? I am not sure. However, I responses yesterday to say that I had no idea why this shad been closed as I had responded to every email/request I received.   It seems your outcome to this issue had just been to close the claim when it hs been anythign but resolved
    • If we had details of what and why you are claiming we could advise more appropriately...but understand if you wish to refrain from divulging. 
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
Mike505

Used an 'NHS only bay' in a council car park, got a PCN, but signs are too high up to read?

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1558 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Jamberson

They didnt move it,

they just rotated 90 degrees so its visible just as I wrote in my defence plea.

 

I know - and you can't rotate something without moving it.

 

Look

- the council can do what it sees fit with their signs, when it sees fit.

You may suspect that if the council moves - rotates - the sign

- then it proves this or that, but in truth it doesn't prove anything on its own.

That's whay I suggest you dig around and see if you can find out why they rotated it.

 

 

It could be for some other reason

- you don't know yet

- and equally you won't know if any case you may put together would have any retrospective weight.

After all, you had a free adjudication process and an impartial judgement on the case was made.

 

To be honest, phrases like "admission of guilt", "clearly in the wrong", "extortion", "mugged" and so on, are not constructive.

 

 

You need to get some facts.

Even when you have them, your chances are still slim to none,

but if you want to fight for a refund you'll need to investigate it first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What evidence do you have that it was the council that moved the sign and not a third party, perhaps even someone else whose inattention led to a PCN of their own?


My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far I have not written to the council, only to the adjudicators hoping that they would reverse their decision.

 

 

Obviously, judging by their silence they are hoping I will go away.

 

 

I am going to write the council too, but I am not hopeful about a reply.

 

 

As for Basic Account Holder,

I wrote on this forum hoping to get some suggestions for justice..

comments like yours smack of schadenfreude and not at all helpful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your reluctance to show the adjudicator's decision isn't helpful either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no reluctance MB, I simply dont have it.

But what is there to know?

 

 

They ruled against me and thats that.

I will dig some more and try to find it.

 

 

The main thing is that they have refused to even acknowledge my recent correspondence to them

with copies of my plea and recent photos.

 

 

They know once they enter into correspondance they may be forced to reverse their decision.

This injustice doesnt just affect me personally,

it affects the public on the whole.

 

 

You'd think a council body would own up to their mistakes,

not when it come to siphoning money to their coffers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no reluctance MB, I simply dont have it. But what is there to know? They ruled against me and thats that. I will dig some more and try to find it.

 

You say you have all the evidence etc, yet cannot produce either the pcn no. or the London Tribunal reference no.

 

Sorry I simply don't believe you.

 

You also say you wrote to the adjudicators by recorded delivery, with photographs, asking them to ask the council to refund. One assumes that if you seriously wanted them reverse their decision, you would have included the reference no. in order that they would know which case you were talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael, let me assure you that I am not some whacko wasting other people's time.

 

 

If you care to trace this thread before you embark on invective,

I did include the pcn and case numbers but they have been blanked,

probably by the moderators.

 

 

I have finally gotten through to the adjudicators by phone and they tell me they are on the case.

They have forwarded my recent photo (above) to the council

and they are awaiting their response.

 

 

I am not saying its an open and shut case,

but why, when I thoroughly pleaded my case of inappropriately placed signs,

does the council take my money and then go and do exactly as I suggested?

 

 

Think about it... if the sign was in the position that it is in now,

I would have seen and not incurred this penalty.

I will keep you posted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you care to trace this thread before you embark on invective, I did include the pcn and case numbers but they have been blanked, probably by the moderators.

 

They may possibly have done, but you're the one with all the original documentation, ie the pcn itself, the NtO, your representations to the council, their rejection letters, correspondence to and from the London Tribunals, all of which will have quoted the pcn no. Yet you still can't/won't provide that one piece of basic information.

 

One has to wonder why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excuse me Michael, you are getting rather tiresome.

The only documentation that I am NOT in possession of is the tribunal's decision letter.

I HAVE all the rest.

 

 

As I said in my previous post, I have managed to contact the adjudicators and they are looking into the matter,

so what is your problem?

 

 

The tribunal have all the documentations

(pcn, decison letter, my defence plea, my recent letter to them showing the rotated parking sign etc etc)

and they are REVIEWING the case.

 

 

Or are you saying that YOU want to see the docs?

Why?

 

 

You have already seen that its not ok to forward pcn details on this site?

 

 

Ask the moderator.

I'm confused

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only documentation that I am NOT in possession of is the tribunal's decision letter. Or are you saying that YOU want to see the docs?

Yes

 

Why?

So that we can see precisely the reasons why the adjudicator refused your appeal, which may help us to help you.

 

You have already seen that its not ok to forward pcn details on this site? Ask the moderator. I'm confused

There is nothing in the site rules that preclude posting pcn or London Tribunal ref no's if you're happy to. Clearly you aren't, which leads to the conclusion that there's something in the adjudicator's decision which you don't want us to see.

 

If I'm wrong just post the no's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For Christ's sake Michael...

I HAVE POSTED THE NUMBERS A FEW POSTS UP AND THEY HAVE BEEN BLANKED!!!!!

 

 

Why are you so adamant on seeing them?

You dont have to believe anything I say, just stop responding to me and go about your business.

 

 

As I have said, the tribunal said they are looking into the matter.

. if they dont have the details that you say I am "hiding",

why would they be looking into the matter?

 

 

Or dont you believe me on that either? In which case say so so

and I will stop responding to you.

have a good day sir.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For Christ's sake Michael... I HAVE POSTED THE NUMBERS A FEW POSTS UP AND THEY HAVE BEEN BLANKED!!!!! Why are you so adamant on seeing them? You dont have to believe anything I say, just stop responding to me and go about your business. As I have said, the tribunal said they are looking into the matter.. if they dont have the details that you say I am "hiding", why would they be looking into the matter? Or dont you believe me on that either? In which case say so so and I will stop responding to you. You have a good day sir.

 

For information, the numbers were removed by the site team, they were provided by Mike505. It was felt that they were personal information.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From that I'll take it that you are never going to post a copy the adjudicator's decision?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Honeybee13. Michael, you have shown blatant contempt for my posts calling me a liar on more than one occasion. There is no point in posting the adjudicator's decision, I am not anxious to have you onside. Suffice to say the jury is still out on this one. If you are really interested, stay tuned and I will update. Other than that I have nothing further to say to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's to say they haven't decided to move the sign because of any ruling, but purely on the basis that they are likely to save time dealing with another complaint kike this if they move it slightly.

What's to say they even moved it? Could a kid bot have turned it?

Or the wind?

 

Didn't your defense rely on them being too high, not the wrong way?

 

We, as Michael has rightly said, need to see a copy of the decision to see what basis he gave that decision on. We cant see or use the pcn numbers etc so have to rely on you posting a pdf of the docs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's to say they even moved it? Could a kid bot have turned it?

.

 

Exactly why I asked what evidence he had that it had been moved by the council and not a third party? No reply though...


My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know if it makes any differance but from the photo,it seems to me.it's a new post the signs have been placed on,in a different place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(a) In my plea I said the sign was too high AND facing the wrong way. Both contribute to the sign being inadequately visible, therefore a PCN generator

(b) The wind blew it? really? Exactly 90 degrees? God must have disagreed with the tribunal and heard my plea then. Also why would a kid waste his ASBO energy to rotate a sign thats 11 feet high? Indeed, why would ANY third party bother to rotate the sign?

© As honeybee said, the pcn and case numbers have been deleted for privacy reasons. On reflection I think it was foolish to have have posted them, but I am glad they were blanked (thanks moderators) because, really, I came here for sage advice and guidance, instead I got a load of bullcrap from some mean and cynical posters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go, don't know what all the fuss was about:

 

The allegation in this case is that the vehicle was parked in a permit bay in an off-street car park without clearly displaying a valid permit.

Mr. xxx does not in fact dispute this but he criticises the quality of the signage.

He says that he believed he could pay and display and duly did so.

He did not see any signs to indicate the bay was restricted to permit holders only.

He has provided photographic evidence to support his assertion that the signage of restrictions was not clear and adequate.

He says that he parked in heavy rain and rushed out of his vehicle to the pay and display machine.

He criticises the location of the time plate ‘on a post’ and also its height on the post.

He has provided a copy of his pay and display ticket.

The motorist should never assume restrictions and must check the relevant signage.

Any motorist who parks without properly checking takes the risk that the vehicle is parked in contravention.

The Enforcement Authority have provided photographs of the signage relied upon and I have been able to consider these together with Mr. xxx’s photographs and those taken by the Civil Enforcement Officer.

Having done so I am satisfied that there were a series of signs indicating ‘NHS permit holders only in blue bay and that Mr. xxx’s vehicle was parked in a blue bay.

I am satisfied that the signage of restrictions was clear and adequate to inform the motorist who gave the question the appropriate degree of attention.

While I accept that Mr. xxx made a genuine error, this amounts only to mitigation.

The Enforcement Authority may cancel a PCN as a matter of their discretion but Adjudicators have no power to direct cancellation on the basis of mitigating circumstances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that this was what was in the adjudicator's letter.

 

 

Dont you agree that the council, having collected their fine,

then go and rotate the sign as per my plea constitute an admission of guilt tantamount to fraud?

 

 

It is clear I would have seen the sign had it been in its present orientation

and thus this is an unjust and duplicitous penalization.

 

 

If the council had been satisfied with the decision above they would not have changed the sign,

and thus they should issue a refund

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"While I accept that Mr. xxx made a genuine error, this amounts only to mitigation."

 

So when does "mitigation" become more than just mitigation? In my view, when the "mitigation" has been changed to reflect the defence plea. It is an admission by the council that their signs are NOT clearly visible. But they went ahead and collected the penalty anyway. Did they charge me for giving them advice on how to display their signs? Yes they did. Surely this is unjust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe that this was what was in the adjudicator's letter.

 

 

Dont you agree that the council, having collected their fine,

then go and rotate the sign as per my plea constitute an admission of guilt tantamount to fraud?

No

 

It is clear I would have seen the sign had it been in its present orientation

and thus this is an unjust and duplicitous penalization.

Except that you've already said:

It was raining heavily when I parked so I wasnt about to turn my head up at the sky to read ANY signs even if I saw them.

When its pelting it down, the last thing you'd do is to look up.

You just want to run to the ticket machine and out of the rain as quick as you can.

 

If the council had been satisfied with the decision above they would not have changed the sign, and thus they should issue a refund

 

 

As barns 66 has said the two photos of the pole have differences, the base for one, so the orientation could have been changed then.

 

Whilst I agree the sign could have been better positioned at a lower height, the fact is you admit that because it was raining hard you didn't bother to check, we've all done it, but it still remains your responsibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the lamp post has been changed judging by the photos. The fact remains that I would have seen the sign in its present orientation, even with the height and the rain. had the sign been facing the right way, it would have been visible to someone walking to or from the ticket machine. Look.. the whole gist of my argument is that they have changed the sign to conform with my defence plea, and as such it throws the whole of the adjudicator's ruling out of the window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Look.. the whole gist of my argument is that they have changed the sign to conform with my defence plea, and as such it throws the whole of the adjudicator's ruling out of the window.

 

No it doesn't, even in it's previous orientation the adjudicator ruled that:

I am satisfied that the signage of restrictions was clear and adequate to inform the motorist who gave the question the appropriate degree of attention.

 

And you've admitted you didn't bother to look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never admitted "I didnt bother to look". I made it quite clear in my plea that signs should be clear and visible in all meteorological conditions. That is why I then added that it was not visible in the rain because even in clear conditions it would have been hard to see. Regardless of all that... why dont you question their decision to rotate the sign? Isnt that the most glaring fact here? Shouldnt they be refunding me the penalty which they now was enforced under false conditions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...