Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Carter Claimform - LLoyds old overdraft 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a claim form for an old Lloyds overdraft yesterday. I was hoping that someone would be able to advise me on how to proceed. I will try and give as much information as possible using the template

 

 

 

Lowell Portfolio I Ltd

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.

 

Date of issue 23/06/2015 + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 12/07/2015 + 14 days to submit defence = (33 days in total) - 26/07/2015

 

^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE OF THE CLAIM IS DAY 1 [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The claiments claim is for the sum of £1200, being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and Lloyds and assigned to to the claimant on 03/07/2013, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

The defendant failed to maintain contractual repayment under the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served which has not been complied with

And the claimant claims £1200.

The claimant also claims statutory interest pursuant to s.69 of the county court act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignmentof the agreement to date but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of £1000 amounting to £94

What is the value of the claim? £1400

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Overdraft

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before 2007, The account I had had since 1996. The last overdraft agreement I had was in 2005 I think

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No idea, I've never received any recorded delivery letters from them

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No idea

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No idea

 

Why did you cease payments? I was heavily in debt and sharing a house. Everyone else moved out and i became liable for the whole rent and council tax at the time, it took up most of my wages. i would have become homeless if I hadn't stopped paying

 

What was the date of your last payment? I haven't used the account since 2007

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No, I have had no contact since 2007, btw this was a joint account.

 

I would be very grateful if anyone knows the best way to proceed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kitty

 

Many thanks for completing the link and providing us with all the necessary information.

 

You have as provided by the link 19 days to complete the acknowledgment of service...this can easily be done by registering to use the MCOL service as explained within the response pack.

You can then deal with this on line.

 

 

What was the date of your last payment? [/b]I haven't used the account since 2007

 

Providing that you have not deposited or acknowledged the account for over 6 years their claim is statute barred and unenforceable....

 

Once you acknowledge the claim...tick the defend all box....ignore contest jurisdiction.... and submit the following defence (assuming your response to the above is no.

 

####Defence####

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

 

Job done....the claimant has 28 days to respond to your defence...or the claim will be stayed or discontinued by the claimant.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Thanks for your prompt reply. I've acknowledged service online as suggested. I'm about to send my CPR 31.14 request to the solicitors recorded delivery. I'm just wondering if it would be worth me sending a subject access request to Lloyds as I no longer hold any information or paperwork about this account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Thanks for your prompt reply. I've acknowledged service online as suggested. I'm about to send my CPR 31.14 request to the solicitors recorded delivery. I'm just wondering if it would be worth me sending a subject access request to Lloyds as I no longer hold any information or paperwork about this account?

 

Why....the debt is statute barred......or is it ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough.....may be useful as a back up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

kitty

you mention this was a joint a/c. has the other used the account recently, when was the last payment by either into the a/c?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have received a reply to my CPR 31.14 request to Bryan Carter. it reads as follows:

 

 

Dear XXX

 

We write to you further to your letter dated 26th June 2015 requesting disclosure under part 31 of the Civil Procedure rules.

 

We confirm this matter will most properly be allocated to the small claims track as this is a simple contractual matter and Part 31 of the Civil Proceedure rules will therefore not apply. In any event, the Notices of Default and Assignment left comtrol of the claimant when they were dispatched to you.

 

It is the original creditor's policy to issue agreements at the start of the contract and statements throughout the duration of the agreement and, in this regard, we ask you to refer to your own records.

 

We confrim our client is not agreeable to an extension for filing for defence

 

As you will be aware a claim was issued in this matter on or around 23rd June 2015. We are in receipt of your acknowledgement of service and we note your intention to file a defence

 

We recommend you seek independent legal advice

 

Yours sincerely,

 

BRYAN CARTER SOLICITORS.

 

Well, can anyone explain what that means? Do they have any documents or don't they? and are they planning to use any in court? I fail to see what the simple contractual agreement is as I've never had one with Lowell. Where do I go from here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

usual Farter response to any CPR31 request, it does apply up to allocation stage, keep that letter for future reference if needed, look at carter threads and you will see all the missives from Carter (Farter)

see what he sends next! BUT read the previous carter threads and you will see a pattern of missive letters,

 

 

if you still cannot get into send via E-Mail

 

 

 

e-mail [email protected]

 

fax 01604 619 523 / 01604 619 526

 

In the subject line put (claim number) - Defence

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I received another letter from them today in response to my defence.

 

Dear XXX,

 

we write further to the above matter and confirm receipt of your defence.

 

We note in your defence that you consider this matterto be statute barred. Our client's position is that the limitation period runs from the date the original creditor became entitled to demand payment. The account fell into default on 14th September 2009 and the claim was issued on 23rd June 2015. It is our client's position that the account is not statute barred and the outstanding balance remains payable by you.

 

Our client has instructed that they intend to proceed with the claim and we will inform the Court of the same shortly. However, our client is willing to enter into 'without prejudice' negotiations to settle this matter by way of a Tomlin Order. If you wish to discuss settlement on this matter, we should be grateful if you would contact our offices.

 

I have a couple of questions for the forum? are they correct? and also is it acceptable to wait 2 years before issuing a default notice that i'm fairly certain I never received?

 

I have sent a SAR to Lloyds, which they've acknowledged receipt of. What should I do now? Reply to letter or wait for the stuff from Lloyds and just discuss it in court?

 

Oh and they still haven't sent anything that I asked for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should respond to say that they have the wrong default date and you will hold them to strict proof by way of copies of original creditors statement of accounts.

 

If you have not used this account since 2007 or made payments, it will be statute barred. They should have issued the default notice as soon as you failed to make the payment due. Normally this is within a couple of months of a payment being missed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

std reply from farter in relation to SB

go read other threads

 

 

put up and pay the fee farter or shut up

 

 

its a begging letter - pay us something before we have to disc the speculative claim

 

 

safe to ignore it

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...