Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Slow broadband speeds? Now you can cancel, in theory


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2520 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Tougher rules to let customers exit their contract

 

New rules being introduced by Ofcom will let broadband customers exit their contract at any time if they aren’t getting the speed quoted by their provider.

 

Currently customers can only cancel their broadband deal penalty free within the first three months of the contract. After that time they are charged a penalty fee to exit, even if their broadband speed is slow.

 

Under the new rules customers can cancel at any time, if the speed they receive is slower than the speed they were quoted when they signed up.

 

http://www.which.co.uk/news/2015/06/slow-broadband-speeds-now-you-can-cancel-406021/

 

 

 

That's the theory, meanwhile in the real world:

 

Three in four households pay for internet speeds they never receive – but very few can use new Ofcom rules to switch providers

 

More than 13 million households who pay for internet speeds they never receive are unable to use new rules allowing people to exit slow broadband contracts.

 

As well as the headline speed, the provider must give a so-called "minimum guaranteed" speed. This is the highest speed available to the slowest 10 per cent of households in their customer base. The new rules introduced by Ofcom last week allow people to leave contracts early only if the speed is below this "minimum" level.

 

Experts said it was therefore likely that just 10 per cent of the 22 million British households with broadband will be able to make use of the new rules to leave their provider.

 

Customers who receive speeds just above the minimum threshold may be unable to argue their cases and will face fees to terminate their contract early.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/shopping-and-consumer-news/11682353/Millions-with-slow-broadband-cant-use-new-exit-rules.html

 

ADVERTISING

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole thing misses the real point, which is that if distance from the exchange etc. is causing your slow speeds, changing supplier is pointless because they all use the same BT cabling to get from the exchange to your house. So once you've gone to all the trouble of changing suppliers your broadband will still be just as slow as before, but your argument will just be with a different company, who also can't do anything about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly, Fredsie, because OFCOM clearly hasn't the faintest idea of how the internet actually works. The people that should be legitimately entitled to exit free of charge while under contract are those whose throughput speed is significantly below the sync speed that their length of line allows, even if only at peak times. That is invariably a result of congestion at the exchange caused by under capacity provided by the ISP. Either that or their equipment at the exchange is faulty in some way. OFCOM's new rules do nothing to facilitate migration under these circumstances. In fact their new code of conduct is so ambiguously worded that it can mean anything the ISP want's it to mean. For instance when they refer to the speed of the lowest 10th percentile it is not specified whether that means sync speed or throughput speed. Equally ambiguous is the code's reference to the lowest speed of "similar" customers. Does this mean a line that's, say, 1 mile from the exchange can be compared with lines that are 1.1 miles, 1.2 miles, 1.5 miles or what?

 

It's quite simple to calculate an individuals absolute minimum sync speed using the distance to the exchange and the resultant line attenuation figure. Anybody getting a throughput speed below 80% of that sync speed should be allowed free exit under contract. Once again OFCOM are competing with the I.C.O. for the title of the most useless quango ever to drain public finances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

New rules being introduced by Ofcom will let broadband customers exit their contract at any time if they aren’t getting the speed quoted by their provider.

 

Don't ISP's already cheat by throttling internet connections to advertised speed for the first x Megabytes so that all those "internet speeds tests" websites you see scattered around report what you're advertised. When really the go back to slow speeds after a while.

 

How does one prove anything in those cases when the ISP can just say "well no, you're lying, see".

 

VqNCCXF.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have been monitoring my sky fibre optic broadband for about three weeks or more and at various times of the day and different days.

 

Sky say that I should get "up to 35 or more Mb" but I am getting at best 2.1 (yes that low) speeds and I have used different speed checks online.

 

So if I sold sky a car that I say will do 35 miles per hour and it only goes at 2 miles per hour they would demand I pay them back!

 

Any idea what I can do?

 

I am planning to go to them and demand them repay the last 18 months fees as the normal broadband speed is just as bad.

 

I am putting together a plan and keeping regular webpage speed by prtSc and copying to a word document with dates and times.

 

any advice will be welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can understand your frustration but your car example is different. You said "a car that will do 35 miles per hour", and if it didn't your buyer would have a claim against you. But that's not how the broadband guys advertise. They always say something like "up to 35Mb", and "up to" can mean anything from 1 to 35.

 

If your speed is really only hitting 2Mb most of the time I think that's exceptionally poor and they should do something about it. First, have you had this broadband service before from anybody else? Was it faster? Are you miles from your exchange? It sounds like you ought to be considered as one of the 10% the original post was talking about. Have you already complained to Sky about the low speeds? If so, what did they say? (If not, that's your starting point. You have to give them a chance to fix things before you go any further.)

 

One other thing. Is the PC / laptop you're doing the speed tests on connected directly to your router by Ethernet cable? If you're connecting via Wifi or through your house power sockets ("Powerline networking"), then your measured figures don't mean anything as far as the ISP is concerned.

Edited by Fredsie
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks. I am connecting via wifi, but I don't think that should make that much difference! Yes I have complained to sky and they just say that it's because we are about 1.5 miles from the exchange, but we have a box at the end of the street (about 150 yards away) plus I also know that as I am paying for fibre optic the fibre only goes to the box at the end of the street and then is copper cable from there.

 

I cannot accept the often stated argument that because we are so far away from the exchange etc. that we will get a slower speed. For example if I turn on my lights downstairs and then upstairs the brightness is never different! the amount od power HAS to be the same throughout the cable/fibre!

 

I also have to use a mobile wifi for work and I tend to have to use that at home as the speed is much faster, so the idea that the router is slow using wifi doesn't in all reality hold water!

 

I will be contacting sky to try and sort out this problem as for many people now, wifiis the way they connect to the internet and I am getting cheesed off with statements about the speeds peole can/will connect, that are ALWAYS wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks. I am connecting via wifi, but I don't think that should make that much difference!

 

Sorry, that's wrong, it makes a LOT of difference. Get a cable and plug your PC (temporarily) into the router. Do your speed tests again and post the results. Until you've done this there's no point in proceeding further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get back onto Sky, they have dedicated technicians that will perform tests on your line to try and resolve this for you.

 

When you are collecting evidence DO NOT use your wifi. As said above, you need to be plugged into your router. The reason being is that a lot of variables come into play when you use wifi that affect the speed. Regardless whether it works fast on another network, Sky simply won't beleive that one of these variables isn't affecting the speed. Give them real evidence.

 

Don't accept the exchange distance argument, 1.5 miles isn't far away at all. Don't use the analogy you used above when you speak to Sky though, it's comparing apples and pears.

 

You can get an idea at what the speed at your router is by going into the router settings from a web page on the device you are using to connect to the internet. Even on wifi.

- Open up a browser window

- type in the ip address of the router "192.168.0.1" and hit enter

- your username is: "admin"

- the password should be "sky"

- in the router status or connection status page it should show your connection speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks. I am connecting via wifi, but I don't think that should make that much difference! Yes I have complained to sky and they just say that it's because we are about 1.5 miles from the exchange, but we have a box at the end of the street (about 150 yards away) plus I also know that as I am paying for fibre optic the fibre only goes to the box at the end of the street and then is copper cable from there.

 

I cannot accept the often stated argument that because we are so far away from the exchange etc. that we will get a slower speed. For example if I turn on my lights downstairs and then upstairs the brightness is never different! the amount od power HAS to be the same throughout the cable/fibre!

 

I also have to use a mobile wifi for work and I tend to have to use that at home as the speed is much faster, so the idea that the router is slow using wifi doesn't in all reality hold water!

 

I will be contacting sky to try and sort out this problem as for many people now, wifiis the way they connect to the internet and I am getting cheesed off with statements about the speeds peole can/will connect, that are ALWAYS wrong

 

I think you need to brush up on your knowledge of how the Internet works jasperpad ( Wired v WI FI) before ringing Sky.:-D

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

PS Try to differentiate between Virgin Cable and sky fibre optic broadband ..its the same as their normal slow broadband but with a nice ribbon wrapped around it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...