Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I hope this is a good place to put this question.

Long and short of it:

I was offered a season ticket loan which has been paid out of my salary each month. I am now leaving my employment on (until now) good terms. There's approx. 3 month left on my season ticket loan.

I have asked to pay the remainder back via standing order over the remaining 3 months to make it manageable. I asked on the 8th June.

I received a response on the 22nd saying the following (I've 'anonymised' the email, and rounded the monetary figures to the nearest £5 for anonymity as well.):

 

Sorry not to have got back sooner.

I've talked this through with *Accountant X* and *Accountant Y*, and unfortunately the company cannot agree to defer the payment of your season ticket loan beyond your leaving date of 26 June and we are required to deduct the balance due from your final salary. To do so would change the character of the loan to a benefit in kind, which *The Company* doesn't offer, and which would require you to be taxed on the benefit so that it is no longer a cost neutral loan.

The upshot is that after deduction from your salary of the outstanding balance due to *The Company* you still owe the company £ 160. To mitigate this we could,with your agreement, not pay the employer pension contribution due to your pension pot for June. This amounts to £70 which would reduce the amount owed to £95. If you agree to waive the employer pension contribution then we will agree to waive payment of the outstanding balance of £95.

Can you let me know if you are happy to waive the June pension contribution from *The Company*?

Do let me know if anything is unclear or if you have any questions.

 

Some other factors:

1) I never signed any documentation regarding the above loan

2) This will leave me without salary for 2 months

3) I've considered the option of getting a refund on my season ticket from the train company and use that money to pay my employer back. However - because of how the train company sorts discounts I wouldn't be refunded the full amount, so would be out of pocket by at least a few hundred and, more importantly: I know from my partner getting a refund recently, the train company can take as long as six weeks to sort out the money back. As such, not only would I be without a train ticket for a month and have to find MORE money for travel to London, I'd still have no salary for living/bills etc. So that's not really an option.

 

If they deduct my salary in the above mentioned way, it will leave me in a situation of substantial hardship. Am I able to do anything? I'd be very grateful for any help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very confused - why don't you just agree to waive the pension contribution? Then you get to keep / refund the season ticket *and* owe nothing.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very confused - why don't you just agree to waive the pension contribution? Then you get to keep / refund the season ticket *and* owe nothing.

 

The issue isn't the pension contribution. Even if I waive that they'll be deducting MY ENTIRE SALARY for the month. In other words, I get NO salary for the month. Which means I will have NO money for two months. Not a penny; simply because they're demanding I repay the entire thing in one hit out of my salary - which is my entire salary for the month PLUS a pension contribution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, ok... so still taking wages and waiving the extra bit.

 

What does your employee handbook say about loans?

 

And what was the application process? I presume you applied somehow?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, ok... so still taking wages and waiving the extra bit.

 

What does your employee handbook say about loans?

 

And what was the application process? I presume you applied somehow?

 

Thanks for the response :)

I've never received an employee handbook. Come to think of it, since I started I've never signed or been supplied a revised contract, despite me having apparently been promoted and having two or three pay rises.

There was no official application process, just a request through emails: It was mentioned verbally, and then followed up with email correspondence with the company accountant and company secretary. This email correspondence highlighted only that it would be paid back over 12 months.The most formal bit was an email from the accountant to the secretary saying "I have spoken to *me* and agreed that I will add the amount on to his season ticket loan and he will replay the full amount on a monthly basis over twelve months. I hope this is okay with you, *Me* seems to be happy with it"

 

I suppose my question is, do I have a legal leg to stand on in saying its unreasonable for the company to take away my entire salary for the month (and more!) when I've offered a (subjectively) reasonable three month solution? I don't know what to do here because I need at least some salary to survive until my next paycheck...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they can't pay you less than NMW. The loan will still be recoverable. But they will need to accept it in some other way.

 

So the size of the problem depends on how much you are paid over and above NMW.

 

Your problem is that if they decide to be arsey your route is a very drawn out court process.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they can't pay you less than NMW. The loan will still be recoverable. But they will need to accept it in some other way.

 

So the size of the problem depends on how much you are paid over and above NMW.

 

Your problem is that if they decide to be arsey your route is a very drawn out court process.

 

Good point Re NMW.Is that per month though or considered over the year? Because based on a 37.5 hour week they have to pay me 975 ish is that right? So they can only take me down to that after the deduction?

If I've been earning roughly 1250 after my 490 train fair loan for the last 9 months so I'm not sure how the minimum wage works in that instance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your season ticket will still have some time to run so cash that back in or arrange its return so the company can. Then arrange to pay the balance back by the end of 2 months and there will be no benefit in kind to get up the accountants nose as it is essentially free travel after you leave that is bothering them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...