Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Nolans Summary Cause Summons - re olde clydesdale loan - **Result Case Dismissed + COSTS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Great resource and wish I had the knowledge to help as so many of you do.

 

 

Perhaps they way I can help is tell my story and have the advice here that may help put someone else mind at rest.

 

I have received a summary cause summons from cabot today.

 

Relates to old clydesdale loan.

 

My business went under in 2009 and everything pretty much went to pot.

 

Struggled to pay my bills for a while then the defaults kicked in and had house repossessed after a a few painful years (another story sold cheap so owe the bank still)

 

I have not heard anything on this debt from CB for years or any DCA - Cabot that i can think.

I have not received any assignation letter from either.

The loan account number still appears in my online banking but for as long as i can remember the balance is 0 it has been like that for at least 2-3 years.

 

 

I thought it had been written off or wait a sec maybe it was assigned way back just not clear as to that but certainly not assigned this year.

 

I am a little confused if it is an enforceable loan why CB are not pursuing, me still bank with them.

If it was assigned way back why are they claiming just assigned in last 5 months?

 

The amount is £4500 so it is summary cause and not small claim.

 

There is no supporting documentation in the summons other than the details in the statement of claim paragraphed as follows-

 

1) Jurisdiction

 

2) The loan account details, that it was under CCA1974, was assigned earlier this year, last payment 2011

 

3) Outstanding balance £4500 not maintained the agreement

 

4) Called upon to make payment I have refused and action rendered necessary.

 

No detail here other than account number, does not note original amount or monthly amount or period of the loan.

 

So first instance will try and get it dismissed but they can lodge again at the correct court so ultimately will have to deal with this.

 

Two things summary cause scares me as unsure what the expense they are allowed to claim, small claim is restricted, so advice on this would be great.

 

Secondly how to proceed without damaging the time bar.

1) They claim 2011 last payment but I think would be 2010

2) Assignation - no letter

3) Is it enforceable how do i best get the details from cabot and cb.

4) Use incourt debt advisor from a debt charity if they talk on my behalf with DCA does this affect the tim bar.

 

The return date, when i have to respond to the court is 27 July and calls in court where it is decided if it will go to full proof hearing on 10 august. If it does go to proof it will be sometime in November I would imagine should I not get it thrown out for jurisdiction.

 

So should I CCA or SAR Cabot and Clydesdale

I don't think i should engage their solicitor at the moment as technically they do not need to give me anything until 14 days before the proof (i think that is right).

 

I have made contact with a local debt charity which has incourt service advice though i don't think they will appear. They will talk to your creditors though so will try and see them later in the week. If they get in touch, think i sign a mandate to allow them to, does this affect the time bar.

 

A few years ago this would a be a very dark place for me tonight, I tried to do something really really stupid that did not work and so I now live life to the full everyday. I really don't get affected or worry about this crap any more I just need to work out how to react to the various outcomes.

 

Thanks for reading and thanks in advance for any advice.

 

D

Edited by deimosboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Welcome to CAG

 

Im not familiar with "Summary Cause Summons"

 

Is this in Scotland?

 

Also as this appears to be a legal issue, I will relocate this thread to financial legal problems so you get more attention.

 

Im sure help will be forthcoming :)

 

Regards

 

SS

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Righto, have tweaked your title a little as well

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be sending cabot a CCA request

 

£1PO leave it blank

don't sign anything.

why don't you ring the original creditor

and ask last payment date

 

this might be very close to be extinguished under Scottish SB rules - 5yrs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links.

Keep the information coming and on some of the specifics would be great.

 

I am understanding this correctly

 

CCA request to DCA (CABOT claim assigned to them) today in post - they have 12 working days to respond.

 

As the 12 days is within the period i need to send my response back to court I do nothing until this comes as my response to the summary cause summons depends on what they send.

No reply that would be my defence. If they supply post up here for advice on enforceable.

 

Check with original lender date of last payment? As in Scotland if it is 5 years then it is SB and that is my defence as it is assigned I am free to contact without affecting SB timescale.

 

Question - If the action has been started i.e. I have the summons the SB i think will be AUG so plus 40 days, if i defend it will be at least October before a hearing. As the SB falls after court papers filed but before the hearing does the SB apply?

 

Question - Should i not request anything of the DCA's solicitor, I don't think there is a need having sent a CCA? or will I send an IA to the court for the documentation with my documents for the return date.

 

May be worthwhile to point out that the papers have been filed in B]wrong jurisdiction[/b]. So what do I need to file at calling to have the case dismissed as court does not have jurisdiction. In returning my papers if i am to try to have the claim dismissed as to the jurisdiction do I need to state that i will defend and lodge a defence or would I take the defence with me at the calling date and should I not have the claim dismissed then lodge the defence?

 

Thanks again for all the help

 

 

Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd – Original loan with Clydesdale Bank

 

Date of issue –

Date of Issue 15/6

Return date 27/7 when I need to return the forms and say if defending

Calling date 10/8 when I need to appear in court would not go to a full hearing this date, a proof diet (hearing) date fixed probably out with 2 months so October

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1. On or around *2005 Clydesdalebank entered into a loan agreement (“the agreement”) within the meaning of section 189(1) of the consumer credit act 1974 (the “1974 Act”) with the defender in respect of a loan reference ***.

 

2.Clydesdale Bank granted the defender credit on this account subject to the defender maintaining an agreed repayment plan.

 

3. The defender defaulted in payment on the agreement.

 

4. On * Clydesdale Bank assigned the debt to Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd.

 

5. The last payment made on * The defender has not maintained the agreed repayments.

 

6.There remains a balance outstanding and resting owing to the pursuers by the defender as at * May 2015 of XXX which is the sum sued for

 

What is the value of the claim? £4500

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned – claim it was this year but think it several years ago

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I can recall

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes – but not got a copy, default date recorded on my credit file

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Absolutely Not

 

Why did you cease payments? To check they claim 2011 but I think and credit file would suggest 2010

 

What was the date of your last payment? Aug 2010 – To be confirmed

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Unsure it dropped off my online banking several years ago, account still there with 0 balance. I thought it might have been written off with a business debt I had

 

 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? NO

 

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

CCA Cabot and have the response attached below asking for 40 days.

I have SAR the original lender so will be 40 days till i get everything from them.

 

I have not contacted Cabot's solicitors the CCA shows they don't have anything right now and so the whole claim is speculative based on eventually finding the documentation.

 

As they have raised the claim now and should they be unable to get the documentation before the case calls would i ask for decree in absolvitor with expenses?

 

As I have stated above under the 1974 act and sheriff court rules the court is wrong as I am not domiciled in their jurisdiction which I would ask for the claim to be dismissed. However if they are under pressure and fail to come up with the paperwork is my best option to ask for decree, can I ask for decree.

 

PLEASE HELP.

Edited by deimosboy
better image attached
Link to post
Share on other sites

std reply from cabot to CCA request.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can I just chip on about the £1 PO, and leaving it blank

 

. I did the same with Nolans some months ago -

they waited for 2-3 weeks, then sent it back to me wit a polite letter saying it wasn't made out to anyone.

It was for £10 for goodness sake, would they even cash it?

 

I had to fill out in respect of their client, and resend it -

month or two later, heard nothing.

 

Mine is an ordinary cause (over £5K)

- I believe Summary Cause for Deimosboy is for debts up to £5K. SLightly different rules for each.

 

, just saying that you may not get your CCA request fulfilled within the 12+2 day deadline, if you don't fill out the PO

, but then that's not an issue - just be prepared for it being pinged back to you to start again.

 

This will be a good sign - I think it means they are stalling as they do NOT have the paperwork they need to proceed to court.

 

Sgianthebard has been studying court cases of this nature and has concluded that procedure is everything - not necessarily having the correct legal argument

 

. That means you really need to study the rules and get everything in on time.l

 

.. I'd also suggest looking for a pro bono lawyer that helps with housing/debt problems, as you may well qualify for legal aid for this, and that will be like wearing a suit of armour for you

- your lawyer will ensure everything is done to exact procedure and you will not be liable for huge legal fees -

although, depending on circumstances, you may need to pay a contribution.

 

It is likely, though, that this won't go to court, if they cannot issue you with the correct paperwork, but they will string it along.

 

This is where having a solicitor backed by legal aid is very useful, although the more experienced folk here will advocate doing it yourself

 

... But the main point is that these DCA etc are trying to steamroller it thru the court.

 

As long as you keep an eye on the ball, you won't allow this to happen, and you will win... Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm tied up with stuff until Monday, but I'll have a detailed look thru your posts then and if I can give any helpful info gained from my own recent court cases, I'll pitch in :)

 

Just a quickie about decree of absolvitor:

 

Sherriff does not have it within her power at a summary cause to grant this decree unless the case has been fully heard by the court.

 

But Sheriff CAN dismiss it, for any procedural reason and the SB clock starts running again

 

. The pursuer can then issue a new summons to start the procedure again from scratch

- but this will likely take some time.

so...if you have a few reasons to have it dismissed,

use only ONE of them at a time

so that you can get the clock started.

 

As you are VERY close to SB in Scotland, it should only take one, or maybe 2 dismissals to get the debt SB and unenforceable.

I'll go into more detail on Monday :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

99/100 leave the po blank

 

its only nolans faffing the claimant s a round that's all

just like restons do.

 

the only reason why a blank £1PO will ever be returned is to try and unsettle the defendant

and get them worrying about time limits

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They WILL try to grind you down by dragging things out

: adjourn for 6 weeks to get some documentation sorted

 

, adjourn fvor 6 weeks to let you read thru the documentation they sent you,

 

adjourn for 6 weeks because of a case they have involving children that must take precedence over your case, etc etc

. (these are ALL tactics Shoosmiths used against me)

 

What they are really doing here is trying to get as many appearance dates as possible, in the hope that you will not turn up or be late for one of them and they will win the case by default.

But they are only kicking themselves in the head, because if they delay past August, and then you get a dismissal for wrong court, or something - the clock starts running and the debt is instantly SB :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

Thanks for the replies. Depressingly looks like I am sunk.

 

So I have the original loan agreement from a SAR to original lender - Two Pages attached.

My bank statement shows a payment which puts me inside the SB period unfortunately, an automatic collection by the bank.

 

So look to have dismissed on jurisdiction and expect to receive an updated claim.

 

Assume Cabot will get the copy from CB and so will have to deal with this.

 

First thing is the paperwork enforceable and could i build a defence in court or am I looking at a time to pay oder?

 

Thanks again in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you put the figures back please

only blank out pers details

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will that not help identify me if they are watching.

 

Who is paranoid? not me, ok just bit.

 

original loan was approx £16k, Interest approx £5.2k, monthly £290 approx.

 

Did not take any PPI with this loan.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit late to worry about that now

 

You have a claim form and you need help

Just blot out names & ref numbers

 

Go look at other uploaded agreements

You will see we need figure etc

 

Upto you.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean by auto collection by the bank?

 

Was there no DD set up

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Result Case Dimissed with expenses

 

ended up at the 1st calling court date today.

 

The court did have jurisdiction to hear the matter

however the claim was filed in the wrong court in that there is a court closer to my home address.

 

Court had a couple of options

Transfer to correct court,

Dismiss.

 

Pursuer solicitor was not briefed and was simply looking to adjourn to get more paperwork.

 

Having SAR cabot and their response indicates they accept debt is unenforceable as they do not have any paperwork.

 

I argued that the court is about success and failure and that as the pursuer has failed to identify if they have a case in law by examining the paperwork prior to lodging with the court I should received a decree in absolvitor.long shot but you never know,

 

as the opposing solicitor picked her jaw up from the floor the Sheriff agreed with me that they should have prepared the case before filing and that whilst he could not award decree he would dismiss the action with an award of expenses

.

at 10% scale for expenses I will have a check north of £350 coming from Cabot :-)

 

I expect they will refile in correct court when/ if they get their hands on the paperwork and so will need your combined wisdom once more.

 

Thanks for the posts and support.

 

Wish I knew enough to help others out so kudos to the boys and girls who take the time out to help people like me out.

Edited by deimosboy
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm lead to believe that Cabot are useless at getting their hands on paperwork.

 

I have an issue with them just now - case sisted..

 

. I am still waiting for a response to my request for the CCA, from about 3 months ago...

 

I'm gonna keep my fingers crossed for you and hope you never hear a thing again...

 

Question for the more learned folks here though,

 

does the statute barred clock 'restart' in a situation like this...??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pursuer solicitor today was wanting to sist

 

. I produced Cabot letter where they admit they have no paperwork and argued that they should be in possession of the papers to assess if they do have a claim in law before filing a summons,

this is something If I was you would rely upon when the next calling comes.

 

The SB is stopped while it is in court business, as I understand it does not extend the period i.e. SB is three months away

 

court action raised then so long as court action is ongoing when the SB date is reached it is not relevant, however if case is dismissed the original SB date once again applies.

 

Yeah fingers crossed they chalk me up as one of those types and not the no show, go away types.

 

I would be happy to settle for a couple of hundred on top of what they owe me now just to have it all go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers...

 

used to be they HAD to supply a copy of the CCA with the writ, when filing for an Ordinary Cause (my case is Ordinary Cause), but no longer need to - simply aver to it - opens it up for all these idiot bottom feeders...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...