Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court debarcle - case adjourned to 22nd June


ibis
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys I really need some advice in regards to a legal matter. i am advocating for a lady with learning disability we were in court friday over ballifs warrant and getting it stayed. The day before the lady and myself met the solicitor and she was awful to my client, she had her in tears.

 

We discussed it and went to court the following morning . the claimant which is the local housing authority sent there barrister over to us before our solicitor arrived. my client wanted to fire her solicitor and have the duty solicitor to represent us and push for an adjournment so she could be represented properly.

 

We told the barrister what we were going to do. our solicitor arrived walked straight by us shook hands with the barrister and the local housing authority representative. the barrister told her of our intentions so she stormed over to us began accusing my client of wasting legal aid at which point i stepped in and told her she was appaling.

 

What I want to know is are we in trouble for doing this ?, can the barrister do that as my client should have been the one to tell her? we are aiming to get a learning disabilitys specialist solicitor as back in court imminantly the court said 22nd of june day before eviction but the local housing authority approached my client an told her they want all there papers by the 19th .

 

I have no legal training im purely going as the girl hasnt got anyone else but me and a friend we are not employed by any agencys so have been winging it any advice please

Edited by citizenB
formatting for easier reading
Link to post
Share on other sites

well i work as a therapist so just use client and advocating because due her learning disability she doesnt always get her needs met , essentially a friend introduced her to me at a volunteer soup kitchen and been trying to help her out please excuse my terms just trying to make her sound like a person rather than this woman or girl or lady ok,plus i dont have no agency to back me up so am trying to remain somewhat professional,

 

its not like shes a neighbour or friend, and i didnt know everything was as complicated as it was but what can i do no proper advocacy services or either social services could help in time for court ,and i dont want to be classed as taking advantage of a vulnerable girl .

Edited by citizenB
information
Link to post
Share on other sites

well i work as a therapist so just use client and advocating because due her learning disability she doesnt always get her needs met , essentially a friend introduced her to me at a volunteer soup kitchen and been trying to help her out please excuse my terms just trying to make her sound like a person rather than this woman or girl or lady ok

 

I think it would help to know the full story and why this person (how about a made up name to make her sound like a person) is being evicted.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She is being evicted on the grounds of rent arrears her property caught fire she was moved into alternative accomodation and then returned to the property ,at this point she didnt realise her housing benefit had been stopped so didnt renew a claim , she just left it ignored letters and now owes a good few thousand , the council dont believe she has a learning disability but several agencys including social services have agreed to support her should she stay in her flat .

 

plus she had a psychological assesment done for court in 2008 for social services who removed her children based partialy on that and what they saw. Her house is a tip she has been living unsupported in the community and no recommendations for a mencap adviser a social worker life skills classes were followed up from her child custody battle.

 

Because she wasnt paying rent and her gas was capped of she wasnt able to prove she was living in the property so they are using that as a second thing ,she has just gone over 6 months with no hot water and has been trying to put the wrong gas companys card in her meter assuming its broken she just left it. I know it sounds unbelieveable but ive seen it all.

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Social Services been asked to help and would her GP write a letter confirming her learning disabilities?

 

Does she claim benefits, and if so, which ones?

 

Could she get HB going forward, or even backdated?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

social services are allocating her a social worker and she is in the system. gp has refered her for another learning disability assensment which again is in the process of being sorted. housing benefit refused her claim for back dating and told family mosaic (support workers) when they rung them that she needs to open a new claim which she has done cancelling out the previous one and any chance of back dating. currently she is on job seekers allowance has no housing benefit in place because they are still processing that as well . Cab have tried to help but cant do any more. im trying to find her a learning disabilitys solicitor and have got the duty solicitors number from court to ask if he could represent her if i cant find one . she has legal aid but this is all new to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

main reason was not asking for a stay in regards to executing the balliffs warant. The cab said she should apply for a stay of this but the solicitor wanted to agree,and push through the warrant plus she didnt explain things to the lady so most of it she didnt understand,she refused to acept she had a learning disability and shouted at the lady till she was in tears.

 

I spoke to the solicitor on duty who represented her he managed to get the case adjourned so we can get medical evidence to support her disability, the council want all details in regards to the housing benefit claim, as twice she has personally submitted documents which have been told are fine only to recieve letters stating she needs to bring such and such, which she does then they cant find it .

 

Family mosaic spoke to them last and set up the new claim about 4 weeks ago and she is still waiting to hear, rent is accruing on her acount so its a bit of a mess.

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to a solicitor on the phone and told him what I said above and he thought that at the eviction/seeking possesion stage it could have been argued as no appeal was put in from looking at her court documents, but then im not sure what i would be looking for anyway. I have a possible solicitor lined up locally but cant contact them till monday morning. Surely the Local housing Authority should have a duty of care to her?

Link to post
Share on other sites

main reason was not asking for a stay in regards to executing the balliffs warant. The cab said she should apply for a stay of this but the solicitor wanted to agree,and push through the warrant plus she didnt explain things to the lady so most of it she didnt understand,she refused to acept she had a learning disability and shouted at the lady till she was in tears.I spoke to the solicitor on duty who represented her he managed to get the case adjourned so we can get medical evidence to support her disability, the council want all details in regards to the housing benefit claim, as twice she has personally submitted documents which have been told are fine only to recieve letters stating she needs to bring such and such, which she does then they cant find it .Family mosaic spoke to them last and set up the new claim about 4 weeks ago and she is still waiting to hear, rent is accruing on her acount so its a bit of a mess.

 

That all happened after the solicitor was told she was being fired though.

 

What learning disability does she have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have SS given any indication of when a social worker will be allocated? If not, chase them up on Monday and make it clear that urgent help is needed.

 

The adjournment seems short for the amount to be done.

 

If Ms X has not engaged with the LHA they may have had no choice, but there are protocols they need to follow before reaching this stage. If they haven't, it could work in your favour.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the day before. She has only ever seen the solicitor twice the rest of the time its form filling with her junior , this was the meeting before court, the lady didnt get a chance to speak to her in at the court as the claiments barrister told her she was going to fire her so she came over got the lady to sign to say she no longer wanted her services shouted about legal aid being wasted and went .she has complex needs according to the report from 2008 she fails to understand the impact and complexity of situations she can read and write but i ve found out she was in special education at school too.

 

She lost custody of her children due to this and was demmed to be in the bottom percentage of intelligence and theres a paragraph in the report about although she doesnt appear to present as a profound learning disability she is impaired enough to require being considered so for the proceedings. Im ringing SS first thing monday and chasing up learning dis assesment, as well as looking for solicitor .

 

the local housing authority discussed in front of me whether they thought she had a learning disability and have allocated her a housing options officer ,but she really wants to stay in her bedsit, we got her gas up and running she is making token rent payments as of this week .

 

She doesnt respond to her letters but often the block where she lives post goes missing ive asked a couple of neghbours to write to support this fact as its a shared letter box that they also dont get there post which they have done. Other than the above is there anything else i should be doing?

 

I cant get her a proper advocate from an agency as they wont deal with housing issues, at least thats what they told me. so am trying to cover all the bases to give to her solicitor as much as i can .

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor also said in the meeting the day before court that she was very very pessimistic because her hb wasnt backdated and when she gave us the ballifs warrant she had put down it was uncontested or words to that effect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried Shelter?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have before this in regards to the ladys situation when i found out she was being evicted . but as she had legal representation they couldnt do anything. Is it worth speaking to them again do you think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't hurt to try.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking the time to read and reply, just having a bit of a panic but feel a bit more confident, obviously getting her represented first but will chase up all nessacary other agencys xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

also ive just found the homeless section on the forums so apologies for posting in the wrong section if i have x

 

 

No problem. I'm actually going to move your thread to the repossession section and am asking Lea_HTH for some advice.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What grounds were on the original claim for possession? You will find the information in section 4 of the particulars of claim. You said rent arrears and something else...these have grounds that should appear as numbers (e.g. ground 8, 10 etc) on the particulars.

 

What else do the particulars of claim say?

 

Did your friend attend the first hearing?

 

When was the claim for HB put in? She clearly was asked to provide more information and failed to do so - if they find that to be her fault, she won't get backdated HB. If the HB issue is now resolved, can she afford to pay something towards the arrears? How much are the arrears?

 

I suspect the bigger issue is the one other than the rent arrears...

 

It's perfectly acceptable for two lawyers on opposing sides to discuss a case, and nothing untoward in one telling the other information they gathered...including that the defendant planned to get rid of them. That was a shocking waste of legal aid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The grounds are as follows. rent arrears, other breach of tenancy ,actual of threatened ASBO actual or threatened use of the property other not using the property as your principal home. The lady has learning disabilitys, her solicitor didnt represent her in court and if the council had supported back when she lost her children she wouldnt be in the mess the fact that she has been left to rot and let down by all services involved is whats shocking. She hasnt the ability to understand what goes on around her let alone deal with the mess she is in. If her solictor had represented her properly and not spoken to her like she was rubbish, Myself ,another person the cab and family mosaic (support services) have all spoken to housing benefits and told different things her documents were told they were fine and she has an advocate (not myself to prove this) again they dont accept her learning disabilty as reason, despite family mosasic supporting her now, social services appointing her a social worker, the doctor refering her to the nhs for an assesment. She also had a psychological assesment done in 2008 for court ,which states thats she must be regarded as having limited ability to understand complex proceedings and also the inmplications of her choices unless she has it explained to her very clearly ,based on the Wechsler scale of intelligence she performed extremly low. yes she attended the first hearing and was represented by the duty solicitor despite her having solicitor. I may not know the law but I do know there is different processes to follow when dealing with a vulnerable person even by solicitors, and none of the people involved have had any regard for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those aren't grounds. I was quite specific in asking for the numbers, which will be detailed on the particulars of claim. I also asked for further information from the PoC.

 

My questions weren't answered. Most of what you've written is merely repetition - if you want help, you'll have to answer the questions and stop adding your own opinion - facts only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats with the solicitor now, but from what I remember it was grounds 1 and 2 of the housing act under 2 there is a hole list of clauses cited. After speaking with the solicitor we have to get proof of her learning disability which social services are ringing me about tommorow. Proof of living at the address for 2 years. This is where we have hit a brick wall, there are no utility bills paid over 2 years, along with no rent ,council tax , this I found out today, so now I dont know what to think, you cant go 2 years with out paying anything to anyone and her learning disability isnt significant enough for that to realisticly happen. As I said before I was helping with this as a favour to a friend before i knew all this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...