Jump to content


Erudio and final FOS decision - now drydens PAP Letter


plong979
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1124 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So it was a letter of claim?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

drydens too. blimey..the we never go thru with anything lot..99% letterhead only..if they even actually exist..arrows are getting desperate..typically they normally only ever use those letterheads when going for backdoor CCJ's to old addresses. then they go dead silent..when they get a response from the correct address...strange.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and that att

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go read post 4 of that thread...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets just resit here

a cca wont hurt no.

 

I think this is because drydens think [that because you didn't update AIC - no need] you are resident at the old address

they never get involved till someone sniffs a backdoor CCJ.

 

id alose use the ATT to very briefly outline you are still in dispute

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just putting the finishing touches to the form. I'm including an attached sheet to explain my position.(i'll stable it to the form as well)

Box D

I dispute the debt: please see attached sheet

I have attempted to defer every year I’ve been eligible but Erudio refused to acknowledge my deferment even though I provided the same evidence which Student Loans Company accepted without incident for over 10 years. This year is the first year (2018) which I have been over the threshold and I requested payment details in line with the terms and conditions of the loans which I took out with the Student Loans Company, Erudio ignored my request to send me payment details. I dispute the debt because the conditions required for its enforceability (ie income threshold) were not met and therefore I should have been deferred and not have entered arrears and have the loan conditions terminated.

 

Box H

I have provided documents: please see attached sheet

I have enclosed my deferment requests as well as my payment request for when I was over the threshold.

Do I have to tick Box I like in the thread you linked?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read post 4 of that thread!!!

No you dont need to do H

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i read it, sorry if i don't understand it correctly.

 

 

so just leave it at Box D then and remove the last sentance?

 

 

Box D

I dispute the debt:

I have attempted to defer every year I’ve been eligible but Erudio refused to acknowledge my deferment even though I provided the same evidence which Student Loans Company accepted without incident for over 10 years. This year is the first year (2018) which I have been over the threshold and I requested payment details in line with the terms and conditions of the loans which I took out with the Student Loans Company, Erudio ignored my request to send me payment details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grr..do as post 4

You dont need to supply them your docs [H]

 

Do I as well name

 

dont sign print name

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah i'm not doing H as you said.

you did say in a previous post that "cca wont hurt no", so do I need to do a CCA like in post 4 or not?

or do i just put this in I...

 

I also require you to supply the following..

a copy of the Default Notice

A copy of the Notice of Assignment

A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

I. All Transactions.

II. any additional charges, be them by the original creditor or you Erudio (or is it drydens?) the debt purchaser or any predecessor DCA.

III. details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

IV. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

 

 

or do I put something else?

 

 

or do I just tick I and leave it blank?

 

i am trying my bnest i;ve got alot of drama going on in my life at thje moment so trying to keep on top of everything. sorry that im slow on the uptake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You follow as post 4

I cant see why you keep having issues with simply following the example....

 

I is great

Yes cca cant hurt for £1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm following it but i got confused with other posts also doing the PAP but not following Post 4.

 

you also said explain a bit so it my attached sheet fine then? or shall i just do it word for word.

 

So I basically doing Post 4 word for word then, so I do need to send a CCA so please say that instead of "it won't hurt", I am not very good at this. i am trying and i really do appreicate the help, i'm just a bit rubbish at it all

 

i am also getting confused by the CCA, I am putting s77 but further down it's got s77(4), do i need the (4)? (i suspect yes)

Link to post
Share on other sites

loans are section 77 that's all that's needed

 

your form is fine now

xtra sheet for d is ok

I is ok too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

matters not erudio are both

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...